She's obviously trying to win 

 

But, I agree

Her saying this after saying she opposes the arms embargo on Israel yesterday is so unserious

1 hour ago, Kylizzle said:

Weren't y'all begging her to say something and now that she's said it you're mad she's speaking on it

RIGHT 

In this thread: the left more concerned with being 'perfect' than being effective.   As usual.

8 minutes ago, Mr. Blue_Shirt said:

Her saying this after saying she opposes the arms embargo on Israel yesterday is so unserious

I'm not really sold on her wanting to do a arms embargo for obvious reasons but even if she did, she probably couldn't say that openly to the press because Aipac are freaks & would probably then try to tank her campaign 

11 minutes ago, Capris Groove said:

In this thread: the left more concerned with being 'perfect' than being effective.

What do you will have a bigger effect on fewer Palestinians being killed?

• 500 free hugs from Kamala for all Palestinian-Americans who run a small business for 4 years in a low income area
• Blocking 500 JDAMS from being shipped to Tel Aviv that would then be used to kill another 10,000 Palestinians in the course of 2 months

?

Edited August 10, 20242 yr by Communion

Looks like her team found a better way to handle the issue of addressing the protestors, good job!

2 hours ago, Gaia said:

I'm genuinely curious, do you think she has the authority to STOP anything she disagrees with Biden on who is the actual president?

 

She is very clearly trying to get a ceasefire while remaining status quo. If Hamas was as glorious as you guys insinuate they would have just released the hostages by now because if Israel continues to attack after full hostage release there are no excuses anymore for anyone to support them. 
 

As long as they have hostages Israel will continue to do whatever they want. 

Israel couldn't care less about their 'hostages'. They'll find any other excuse to keep bombing on kids and civilians. Israel has taken Palestinians as hostages for decades, and now suddenly they m*rder thousands of innocents because of that?? And yet they have the nerve to call 'terr0.rist' to any other one who doesn't agree with their ge.0cidal views 

1 hour ago, JustHoran said:

RIGHT 

"She's just trying to win" is sending me. It's an election like huh.

 

2 hours ago, Kylizzle said:

Weren't y'all begging her to say something and now that she's said it you're mad she's speaking on it

Because she was yet to send $3.5B more to Israel 

Seems the honeymoon is over. 🤣🤣 im pretty sure Kamala has said on record she believes in a two state solution. But there is only so much she can say without going against the current president as the current VP. Quite frankly, what leftist are ignoring is that she is willing to misten, even if she cant fully speak (see biden, AIPAC)

The way the goalposts just keep on moving

Evidently not if she opposes an arms embargo like she said yesterday. But I guess the good news for her is that she won't have to pursue a hostage deal. Israel is doing that for her already by bombing Palestine to smithereens.

 

Edited August 10, 20242 yr by DAP

I sometimes wonder why more people aren't radicalized but then I see the brain rot on here and social media…

4 hours ago, ZeroSuitBritney said:

After Biden released 3.5B in military aid and weapons! Slay #GIRLBOSS 

Stick to your Stan Wars. These topics are clearly above your capacity.

I dont understand why every politician seems to need to qualify the sentence "CEASEFIRE NOW" with something like "bring the hostages home" like...which hostages you talking about gurl? The Israeli hostages that have probably all been bombed or starved to death? Or the Palestinean hostages that we are now seeing are constantly being subjected to sexual abuse and rape by Israeli soldiers? Probably the former given its a politician from United States of AIPAC but I digress...at least she handled it more tactfully than Biden I guess.

Edited August 10, 20242 yr by BionicWooHoo

Ceasefire?? After seeing the massacre that Israeli just did this morning??? **** A CEASEFIRE, SEND EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM TO THE ******* HAGUE

I hope what she said won't be used by Trumpet against her I mean, wanting to end the war is good but will this statement backfire among electors in the US? 

1 hour ago, toxicgenie said:

Stick to your Stan Wars. These topics are clearly above your capacity.

Stan wars? What is this 2010

 

above my capacity? Baby you need to catch up with my posts for the last 10 months. You thought you ate that…

You morons, if she doesn't say something she is criticized, if she does she is too.  Keep coming for her dummies, that means you want trump as president who strips us off all our rights and will do even more damage in the Middle East, bravo!

Edited August 10, 20242 yr by mylicious

6 hours ago, Oxygen said:

The way the goalposts just keep on moving

The "goal" remains the same: the disarming of the Israeli military. Despite Kamala's words, Israel just received 3.5B of dollars from her own administration to utilize in the genocide against the people of Palestine, so, the goal wasn't accomplished. This isn't a hard thing to figure out at all, you should be embarrassed of yourself in fact 

Edited August 10, 20242 yr by Loca

The way the left gets mad when she says something and when she doesn't.. she's better than both Trump and Biden on Israel/Palestine. 

 

She wants a two-state solution, ceasefire like what else you people want. 

8 hours ago, Mr. Blue_Shirt said:

Her saying this after saying she opposes the arms embargo on Israel yesterday is so unserious

Yeah because she obviously came out and say she agrees with that right.. like do you people really think she could? 

7 hours ago, Oxygen said:

The way the goalposts just keep on moving

The goalpost is and has always been: stop supporting the genocide. 

 

We already know that she wants a ceasefire. She has said it months ago. Biden himself said that he wants a ceasefire.  She also said that she opposes an arms embargo on Israel so how the hell are we supposed to take this lady seriously? No amount of Trump whataboutism and "she's not President yet!!" will help because how much of Gaza will even be left by January 2025? All damage done under their administration.  

 

6 hours ago, toxicgenie said:

Stick to your Stan Wars. These topics are clearly above your capacity.

They are literally a Palestinian-American. Maybe we need delusional ass Libs like you to sit it out.

Edited August 10, 20242 yr by State of Grace.

25 minutes ago, State of Grace. said:

The goalpost is and has always been: stop supporting the genocide. 

 

We already know that she wants a ceasefire. She has said it months ago. Biden himself said that he wants a ceasefire.  She also said that she opposes an arms embargo on Israel so how the hell are we supposed to take this lady seriously? No amount of Trump whataboutism and "she's not President yet!!" will help because how much of Gaza will even be left by January 2025? All damage done under their administration.  

 

And the way to achieve this goal is to disrupt the rallies of the only feasible candidate that could work towards ending the genocide? And potentially jeopardise a razor thin election?