Why are there so many hate tweets gaining traction lately? I've seen so many with like 25K-50K likes

If anything the viral hate posts are giving her more boosts to her catalog plus Judas is popping off

10 years since a Gaga's song won an Emmy

https://www.instagram.com/p/DdH4r8VBcVV/?hl=fr

**** all these online wars I didn't even notice it and yesterday I was scrolling a lot

10 hours ago, SmittenCake said:

If she aint a zionist, shouldn't she let the world know ?

10 hours ago, Diocles said:

Maybe because, unlike those jobless trolls, Gaga actually has a life.

Check Michael's wikipedia page and you will understand why Gaga is silent on these topics. Her soon to be husband picked his side and it is what it is.

And I actually don't give a ****.

When I see people commenting things such as so and so is a Zionist, I take it with a grain of salt. These statements feel like they come from similar crowds of people that would swear up and down that Gaga or whoever signed a contract with the illuminati and worships the devil. It's a side of the internet that thankfully has no crossover with my fyp. These kinds of people say things in absolutes with very little or no evidence to support their claims. Now obviously if Gaga went full MAGA and started making blatant claims like Pink for example I'd have no choice to reassess how I view her.

Being parasocial has never been something I've felt. I don't really care about Gaga's personal life, quite frankly I never did and I think Gaga designed it that way. She isn't a celebrity that plays into tabloids, her private life has always been guarded so it was very easy to just care about the art and I'm glad for it. Obviously I hope she's good in all ways and little things like it'd be cute if she became a mother sure, but idrc one way or another. I care about her personal life like I would a very distant friend. I'm not naive enough to say it's not a possibility, I assume most wealthy people aren't good people but I choose to believe she isn't this evil person these people are trying to claim her to be because I've followed her for 20 years and have seen nothing to suggest as much and that counts for a lot actually.

That is a notorious katycat that comes here, posts something about Gaga to farm likes from y'all and then goes back to his OGH behavior, just so you know.

9 minutes ago, Spicy Pisces said:

That is a notorious katycat that comes here, posts something about Gaga to farm likes from y'all and then goes back to his OGH behavior, just so you know.

This modus operandi from part of this fanbase has been happened since ever in this board even when the like system didn't exist but in other ways, reason of why you had Jolie Lips saying the base was full frauds for years, people that punctually post in the base only to drag Gaga in other threads just to appeal the OGHs in order to appear edgy and hip.

7 minutes ago, Leptine said:

This modus operandi from part of this fanbase has been happened since ever in this board even when the like system didn't exist but in other ways, reason of why you had Jolie Lips saying the base was full frauds for years, people that punctually post in the base only to drag Gaga in other threads just to appeal the OGHs in order to appear edgy and hip.

I'm not new. They're not frauds if they've always been open about their stance. We should be paying dust to them when they post in the base.

Everybody knows that nowadays you just need to insert the word 'Zionist', 'Israel' and AI to create hate viral tweets or TikTok videos attached to someone, no matter if they are true or not, or with fake receipts, they get traction regardless.

Majority of people didn't even understand what is this AI skin biotech project, they just read the word AI without even understand the context and application and they think she is producing fake skin with chatGPT.

These arguments on stan wars are replacing charts stats as ways to drag somebody with people blatantly not even caring about them because as some other people pointed out already days ago in here you shoudn't even browsing ATRL or using a platform that belong to Elon Musk if you are really concerned about certain topics to begin with.

'Lady Gaga is the Elon Musk for gays' posted in a multi billionaire Chinese platform or from an account with a verified paid partnership in an Elon Musk platform, this is the level of those people that for the majority are the usual Madonna and Katy Perry stans who are clearly not in the moral position to have a word in certain topics.

46 minutes ago, Spicy Pisces said:

That is a notorious katycat that comes here, posts something about Gaga to farm likes from y'all and then goes back to his OGH behavior, just so you know.

Why tf are we farming for likes on atrl

Also people need to chill with her saying Israel is misunderstood or whatever the quote was, she also said R Kelly was misunderstood at that same time. 12 years ago is a long time. Every single person on the internet has an opinion about topics they have no clue about. Saying things like the place was beautiful, maybe it was coming from her idealistic, I guess naive message in this day and age of inclusiveness, compassion, building a braver, kinder world etc etc. The "links" to her being a Zionist to me feel so proportionally blown out of context and how are you going to argue with irrationality.

Edited Friday at 08:57 AM3 days by eclipsed

8 minutes ago, eclipsed said:

Also people need to chill with her saying Israel is misunderstood or whatever the quote was, she also said R Kelly was misunderstood at that same time. 12 years ago is a long time.

My whole thing with these comments is like, the public was NOT condemning Israel or R Kelly at that point in time You can look at it with hindsight now like "here's this article about this atrocity that happened, published in 2009-2011" but most people weren't actually aware of that, and it wasn't as widely controversial as you'd think. We were being spoonfed pro-Israel propaganda for ages. R Kelly was still selling records & collaborated with Justin Bieber, Kelly Rowland, Bruno Mars, Mariah Carey, etc. around the same time as DWUW.

So it's ridiculous that whenever Katy Perry does something personally bad (i.e. lower-level sexual assault) or endorses somebody that is already widely disdained (Dr. Luke, Jeff Bezos) it can't be interrogated cuz "look, here's this same video of Gaga complimenting R Kelly in 2013 that we've reposted 500x at this point"

Wait they are basically saying Gaga noticing them was a big inspiration for Touch Touch which is one of the pop best songs of the year, this is kind of huge. I hope they get their Chappell moment and blow up, but I think they'd need something a little more mainstream for it to actually happen.

This convo is pointless. Gaga is obviously not a leader in thought esp concerning world conflicts. Her silence is definitely worth criticizing but calling her a zio just removes the meaning of the word. This sort of internet mob behaviour has been a cancer to the left unfortunately. I agree that it's mostly an echo chamber, it probably won't affect her.

I personally think she's like a "both sider" regarding this conflict but I don't put a lot of weight in her opinion... and obviously we don't know her.

Edited Friday at 09:51 AM3 days by SweetOreosOfHeaven

Idk about marriage but I suppose that Gaga has fibromyalgia, she can't have children even though I know she love them.

Maybe they held a private wedding.

She wants to save something precious like this only with her close friends and family.

About Zionist thing, I see a lot on Twitter. Idk about TikTok. But I think it started when some people found out that that skin Hannibal Lector company has something to do with Israel. Yk about the state of our society rn, I'm talking about Palestine-Israel thing, they're like Salem witch trial. Some people who're on Palestine side would blindly accuse of anyone having something to do with Israel in the past. See, ARTPOP era.

Anyway, BYE.

Monsterz should low key stop using ARUTW being a FRESH solo hit as a shield argument when that song is turning 10 in like 2 years

Endless essays about some internet drama—who the **** even cares? Can we just focus on the music? Do you really think anyone is reading your long-ass rants? You're wasting your energy.

4 hours ago, Europe said:

Check Michael's wikipedia page and you will understand why Gaga is silent on these topics. Her soon to be husband picked his side and it is what it is.

The fact that he used to work under Peter Theil is ******* disgusting

31 minutes ago, Outbound said:

Monsterz should low key stop using ARUTW being a FRESH solo hit as a shield argument when that song is turning 10 in like 2 years

If you're arguing with Taylor/Ariana stans yes but for Katy/Bey stans? ARUTW curb-stomped em

54 minutes ago, Outbound said:

Monsterz should low key stop using ARUTW being a FRESH solo hit as a shield argument when that song is turning 10 in like 2 years

except for Taylor, none of her peers has had a "SoLo" hit like that in the last 10 (or even 15 ) years so why not

I guess my social feed is cleansed because I don't see any "Gaga Lashings" on it.

ATRLers are too gullible and too quick to assume every time, and these people who are ranting about Gaga on X/TikTok/Instagram survive on sensational and performative activism. It drives engagement, but it's just noise, and there's no credibility at all.

This is why major media outlets are not reporting on Gaga's new ventures...

9 minutes ago, Universo said:

except for Taylor, none of her peers has had a "SoLo" hit like that in the last 10 (or even 15 ) years so why not

Flowers comes to mind. Though Gaga is in a much much better position than Miley overall.

Edited Friday at 11:47 AM3 days by SweetOreosOfHeaven

Judas is back to +1M update on Spotify

25 minutes ago, SweetOreosOfHeaven said:

Flowers comes to mind. Though Gaga is in a much much better position than Miley overall.

oh right forgot about that one

tho imagine if Godga had Miley's career (success wise) this site would be 100x worse