Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ATRL

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Login issues

Addison more acclaimed than Tate, why?

Featured Replies

  • Replies 81
  • Views 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Better music, more talent, a nose that doesn't look like a bird beak

  • YourFavoriteWeapon
    YourFavoriteWeapon

    Addison is talented and has artistry behind her music whereas Tate just feels like a group of 30-year-old gay WeHo gay men with Paris Hilton avatars came together to create what they deem to be a "cUn

  • Sharon Stone
    Sharon Stone

    Addison is a talentless flop who will never be successful, so naturally, losers who were bullied in high school shower her with praise.

  • Popular Post

Better music, more talent, a nose that doesn't look like a bird beak

  • Popular Post

Addison is talented and has artistry behind her music whereas Tate just feels like a group of 30-year-old gay WeHo gay men with Paris Hilton avatars came together to create what they deem to be a "cUnTy pOp StAR tO briNG rEaL pOP muSIc bAcK!11"

Because her producers are better at imitating acclaimed artists, songs & albums? Like...what do you want skull these 2 couldn't be any more different in terms of the sounds they're exploring. It's just you forcing some weird narrative that there's a competition here.

Diet Pepsi obsessed with Tate, Why?

Funny how Addison's so-called acclaim did not manifest into multiple Grammy noms like every other truly acclaimed artist.

Scientifically speaking Tate is what you would call a "chop hoe" which causes her to automatically be a loser. It's a biological calling, you cannot fight nature. Call it lucky, blame Allah, Addison was made to end chop hoes

Addison is a talentless flop who will never be successful, so naturally, losers who were bullied in high school shower her with praise.

16 minutes ago, Sharon Stone said:

Addison is a talentless flop who will never be successful, so naturally, losers who were bullied in high school shower her with praise.

I've never met a loser Addison stan, they're all hot and funny. Most Tate stans I know either give MAGA women who only listen to top 40 or the worst gays you know.

50 minutes ago, YourFavoriteWeapon said:

Addison is talented and has artistry behind her music whereas Tate just feels like a group of 30-year-old gay WeHo gay men with Paris Hilton avatars came together to create what they deem to be a "cUnTy pOp StAR tO briNG rEaL pOP muSIc bAcK!11"

And both are still better and more interesting than whatever Lights' flop ass has been doing since like 2011

4 minutes ago, Maleficent said:

And both are still better and more interesting than whatever Lights' flop ass has been doing since like 2011

LMFAOO as if Tate's writing camp'd wannabe Nicole Shitsinger ass could EVER make songs as good as these:

You could've dragged like Selena or whatever and I would've stayed silent but coming for LIGHTS of all artists to defend Taint of all artists is embarrassing rip

Edited by YourFavoriteWeapon

How are they similar artists? Tate is obviously focusing on commercial success and Addison very obviously is not (Addison's not even big commercially at all)suburban

Neither is very original or interesting all things considered... two regurgitators

49 minutes ago, Maleficent said:

And both are still better and more interesting than whatever Lights' flop ass has been doing since like 2011

I like Tate and Addi obvi but we're not gonna drag the good sis that made this bop either!

  • Author

The TaterTots being so pressed maybe you should address your issues with Pitchfork ahh

41 minutes ago, Maleficent said:

And both are still better and more interesting than whatever Lights' flop ass has been doing since like 2011

on what f*cking planet… you're seriously trying to say that Addison and Tate are better than Lights when artistically they couldn't touch Lights with a 3000 mile long pole tornado dgmw, Addison and Tate have some cute bops respectively, but neither of them are touching songs like these in terms of lyrics, melodies, and productional values:

not to mention that Lights is a multi-instrumentalist and produced her most recent album by herself giraffe so she ain't the one to drag!

Because Addison is more artistic, makes better music and is a genuine student of music and pop culture history. What she does has more class to it.

4 minutes ago, Diet Pepsi said:

The TaterTots being so pressed maybe you should address your issues with Pitchfork ahh

Or address their issues with Addison because I'd be jealous too if I saw another artist was putting out art like this:

While my fave was giving…this:

Well, Tate will just have to settle down with being far more successful and known.

9 minutes ago, Le Grande said:

Well, Tate will just have to settle down with being far more successful and known.

madison could be lucky if she can do a small gig as a pre act since she cannot sing, dance or keep the attention as much as tate could

Headphones On the gem that you are. Grammyson Rae will be collecting her awards soon enough. jonny4

5 minutes ago, kellebrity98 said:

madison could be lucky if she can do a small gig as a pre act since she cannot sing, dance or keep the attention as much as tate could

Who is Madison? jonny2

Account

Navigation

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.