18 minutes ago, Lee!! said:

 

 

(do you make these yourself wtf so cool)

7 hours ago, suburbannature said:

People being mass-downvoted for saying that two innocent people didn't deserve to die in Washington, DC was concerning for me. When did we start losing all nuance? You can simultaneously acknowledge and be outraged by the genocide and the endless atrocities perpetrated by Israel occurring in Gaza without justifying (or worse, celebrating) anti-Semitic violent crime. 

the downvotes on this just confirms how the hate is heavily roaming this forum.

1 hour ago, Smarticle said:

can we talk about how the foreskin advocate thread got closed instead 

probably because it was one user posting random tweets back to back like a crazy person

I hate when **** like this happens cause then everyone apparently becomes a victim  

 

the hive is insufferable, the Kats are insufferable, the monsters are insufferable, the swifties are insufferable. None of yall are any different from each other

 

Edited June 26, 20251 yr by Starchild

3 minutes ago, Assassin said:

probably because it was one user posting random tweets back to back like a crazy person

Every time I would see the thread bumped I would think of this:

 

On 6/18/2025 at 6:18 AM, penguintim said:

Don't forget @PoisonedIvy as well x

I gave up on this months ago. A 1 month threadmaking ban somehow lasting 8 months at this point is just humorous to me   

I do however want my dark mode to be restored, it's not functional on my mobile device for some reason and honestly that's more of the reason I've been less active. 

 

Can you take @Lagerfeld back and give us @PoisonedIvy? Their first thread back after crying for months is an inane Beyoncé flamebait thread where people already call her a child molester (!!!) and nothing but a dancer. Let's ship it back.

11 minutes ago, PoisonedIvy said:

I gave up on this months ago. A 1 month threadmaking ban somehow lasting 8 months at this point is just humorous to me   

I do however want my dark mode to be restored, it's not functional on my mobile device for some reason and honestly that's more of the reason I've been less active. 

 

No dark mode for you. 

16 minutes ago, PoisonedIvy said:

I gave up on this months ago. A 1 month threadmaking ban somehow lasting 8 months at this point is just humorous to me   

I do however want my dark mode to be restored, it's not functional on my mobile device for some reason and honestly that's more of the reason I've been less active. 

 

I’ll do it in the morning. 

1 hour ago, JO1s said:

So we can drag Katy for doing cringe dances but we must protect Lana from wandering the stage aimlessly and not hitting a single note correctly?

Well yes

 

1 hour ago, Johnny Jacobs said:

the downvotes on this just confirms how the hate is heavily roaming this forum.

@DirtyPony87 you disliking it and 90% of the comments in the last 10 pages just proves my point. at least comment and speak up instead of spreading downvotes like a coward.

Quote

We're issuing a reminder to all members: abuse of the downvote function, especially actions like targeting users or combing through their post history to mass downvote, goes against the spirit of fair engagement on this platform.

 

Such behavior will result in the removal of your ability to use reactions and a two-month suspension from the site.

 

Let's keep ATRL a place for open and respectful discussion. Thank you for your cooperation.

Why though? This is absolute nonsense. Things have become so restrictive and strict. 

34 minutes ago, discosean said:

Why though? This is absolute nonsense. Things have become so restrictive and strict. 

Things have absolutely not become so restrictive and strict. It’s annoying for miserable losers to go through someone’s entire post history and max out their daily reactions each day. It’s annoying for members and annoying for mods who have to hear about it. If you’re not the one engaging in this behavior why do you care?

4 minutes ago, Ryan said:

Things have absolutely not become so restrictive and strict. It's annoying for miserable losers to go through someone's entire post history and max out their daily reactions each day. It's annoying for members and annoying for mods who have to hear about it. If you're not the one engaging in this behavior why do you care?

Yes they have. For those of us who speak the truth and sometimes that truth hurts but people need to hear it, worrying that we are going to get warned/banned for what we said is not how it should be. It's like there is a secret police laying in wait to do that and it's not okay. 

If we want to respond by downvoting en masse vs. sonning them into oblivion in written form, we should be able to. 

as an ATRL+ member, can i get someone permabanned just because they're annoying and contribute nothing to the community? 

8 minutes ago, discosean said:

Yes they have. For those of us who speak the truth and sometimes that truth hurts but people need to hear it, worrying that we are going to get warned/banned for what we said is not how it should be. It's like there is a secret police laying in wait to do that and it's not okay. 

If we want to respond by downvoting en masse vs. sonning them into oblivion in written form, we should be able to. 

Ok. 

@Ryan

 

Can you add a toggle that triggers this code I wrote? It's a makeshift dark mode. It stores a localstorage value of true to invertStyleEnabled. If enabled, it runs a function that creates and appends style that inverts colors. If you open your console and run the code you can see, though since it's being run outside of the server, it can't reference itself.

 

This is a lightweight solution that won't break the site.

 

Anyone can check it out, its very quick and I only specified some things I saw on the index to not invert.

 

(function() {function applyInvertStyle() {const s = document.createElement('style');s.textContent = "html{filter:invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg)!important;background:inherit!important;}img,iframe,video,picture,object,embed,#ipsLayout_header,.ipsTag,.focus-social li a{filter:invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg)!important;}";document.head.appendChild(s);}if (localStorage.getItem('invertStyleEnabled') === 'true') {applyInvertStyle();}localStorage.setItem('invertStyleEnabled', 'true');})();

 

Edited June 26, 20251 yr by coney island

3 minutes ago, coney island said:

@Ryan

 

Can you add a toggle that triggers this code I wrote? It's a makeshift dark mode. It stores a localstorage value of true to invertStyleEnabled. If enabled, it runs a function that creates and appends style that inverts colors. If you open your console and run the code you can see, though since it's being run outside of the server, it can't reference itself.

 

This is a lightweight solution that won't break the site.

 

(function() {function applyInvertStyle() {const s = document.createElement('style');s.textContent = "html{filter:invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg)!important;background:inherit!important;}img,iframe,video,picture,object,embed,#ipsLayout_header,.ipsTag,.focus-social li a{filter:invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg)!important;}";document.head.appendChild(s);}if (localStorage.getItem('invertStyleEnabled') === 'true') {applyInvertStyle();}localStorage.setItem('invertStyleEnabled', 'true');})();

Just now, penguintim said:

I'm still working on the specifications!!!!

I feel people abuse the downvote button, even when you post your favourite artist people will downvote it just because they hate that artist and i'm sorry but its just petty at this point. 

 

 

29 minutes ago, penguintim said:

I have an update

 

(function () {

localStorage.setItem('invertStyleEnabled', 'true');

function applyInvertStyle() {

const s = document.createElement('style');

s.textContent = `

html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: inherit !important; }

img,iframe,video,picture,object,embed,#ipsLayout_header > *,.ipsTag,.focus-social li a,

img,picture,video,iframe,object,embed,#ipsLayout_header > *:not(img) { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; }

.focus-social li a,#elUserNav a.ipsUserPhoto img,.focus-logo__image img,.ipsPageHeader::before { filter: none !important; }

`;

document.head.appendChild(s);

}

if (localStorage.getItem('invertStyleEnabled') === 'true') applyInvertStyle();

})();

Edited June 26, 20251 yr by coney island

19 minutes ago, coney island said:

I have an update

 

(function () {

localStorage.setItem('invertStyleEnabled', 'true');

function applyInvertStyle() {

const s = document.createElement('style');

s.textContent = `

html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: inherit !important; }

img,iframe,video,picture,object,embed,#ipsLayout_header > *,.ipsTag,.focus-social li a,

img,picture,video,iframe,object,embed,#ipsLayout_header > *:not(img) { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; }

.focus-social li a,#elUserNav a.ipsUserPhoto img,.focus-logo__image img,.ipsPageHeader::before { filter: none !important; }

`;

document.head.appendChild(s);

}

if (localStorage.getItem('invertStyleEnabled') === 'true') applyInvertStyle();

})();

oh you ate that

do one that gives me ATRL+ next

Imagine thinking current ATRL being strict lmfao

 

5 hours ago, discosean said:

Yes they have. For those of us who speak the truth and sometimes that truth hurts but people need to hear it, worrying that we are going to get warned/banned for what we said is not how it should be. It's like there is a secret police laying in wait to do that and it's not okay. 

If we want to respond by downvoting en masse vs. sonning them into oblivion in written form, we should be able to. 

You just describe "bullying" in literal form, and you think it's okay to do so?

8 hours ago, Starchild said:

I hate when **** like this happens cause then everyone apparently becomes a victim  

 

the hive is insufferable, the Kats are insufferable, the monsters are insufferable, the swifties are insufferable. None of yall are any different from each other

 

In fact they ARE different.