zionvision banner is a new low

Eurovision banner are we serious

lmao at the Eurovision banner do mods not convene about this stuff?

the fact the thread is a flop (only 25 pages this year compared to the 100+ pages pre semi-finals of the previous years) should've been the tell to just

Ok what the ff is this avatar

Reveal

I genuinely had no clue this was a eurovision banner

On 5/11/2026 at 5:42 AM, PenguinTim said:

I assure you I am as shocked and confused as everyone else to see the removal of my beautiful Meghan Traunir banner

Putting it in Dark Mode was a choice sis...

wait im in dark mode, so the ae is aespa... why didn't yall use a pic of them i-

7 hours ago, Ger said:

Ok what the ff is this avatar

Reveal

One of the few instances to love this site.

NOT THE BANNER, Y'ALL ARE CRAZY

Why the banner? That person is obviously not well, it's in really poor taste to enable these behaviours by giving them the attention they're clearly craving

Every couple of months you just have to remind me that you’re still here. I literally do not engage with you about anything, ever. And yet…

how dare u mock abusive pieces of ****. Think about his feelings. He's done that for everybody else for so long.

Edited May 13May 13 by Sheep

the Whis stuff is obviously a inside joke like who cares if we give him the attention

6 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said:

the Whis stuff is obviously a inside joke like who cares if we give him the attention

exactly. for months now, we’ve all participated in As the Whis Turns, but now all of a sudden pearls wanna be clutched and people wanna act confused.

y'all are so messy

Can i please have my old WPs removed? @Rian @Devin

I'll make it worth your while

2 hours ago, AriGlinda said:

Can i please have my old WPs removed? @Rian @Devin

I'll make it worth your while

atrl.net/warningpointcleanup

im starting to think the mods were right in taking away people's thread making privileges

On 5/11/2026 at 2:40 PM, suburbannature said:

Exhausting thread. Can't believe (or maybe I can) that we have so many pedo defenders here.

On 5/11/2026 at 6:10 PM, fememeist said:

if you have to make a thread proclaiming anyone that doesn't agree with you is stupid and ugly, you don't got it babe

And that hill you want to die on is defending pedos? Dumb bird

You guys are some of the most passive aggressive and gaslighting members on here. You are not willing to address serious content in good faith and think it's all just stan clowning when you don't dare to respond because you are intimidated that I might raise some points. Accusations matter to you more than documentation and coherency. Just recently some of those members in that thread have been exposed as liars and one just outed himself as an anti-Palestinian bigot. Watch yourselves or you two will be next to be exposed.

Edited May 14May 14 by BjorkIsMyMom

3 minutes ago, BjorkIsMyMom said:

You guys are some of the most passive aggressive and gaslighting members on here. You are not willing to address serious content in good faith and think it's all just stan clowning when you don't dare to respond because you are intimidated that I might raise some points. Accusations matter to you more than documentation and coherency. Just recently some of those members in that thread have been exposed as liars and one just outed himself as an anti-Palestinian bigot. Watch yourselves or you two will be next to be exposed.

Making threats against forum members because you can't defend the pedo with any actual facts

Just now, suburbannature said:

Making threats against forum members because you can't defend the pedo with any actual facts

You have two eyes to see, do you understand that the MJ case is not at all comparable to R Kelly and there are reasons and details why? I responded to all your points and brought up all the details, yet you stubbornly insist and think members here might be unironic pedophiles because they don't think he's a pedo (which is a serious accusation that you will never be able to defend properly). Your experience means nothing, you are not in that thread in good faith and are motivated to attack instead of discussing calmly.

6 minutes ago, BjorkIsMyMom said:

You guys are some of the most passive aggressive and gaslighting members on here. You are not willing to address serious content in good faith and think it's all just stan clowning when you don't dare to respond because you are intimidated that I might raise some points. Accusations matter to you more than documentation and coherency. Just recently some of those members in that thread have been exposed as liars and one just outed himself as an anti-Palestinian bigot. Watch yourselves or you two will be next to be exposed.

You keep poking the bear and are gonna end up in the red again. Just stop this foolishness already.

1 minute ago, Graffiti said:

You keep poking the bear and are gonna end up in the red again. Just stop this foolishness already.

I have nothing to gain or lose because child sex abuse is actually serious but not many of you actually take it seriously.

11 minutes ago, BjorkIsMyMom said:

You have two eyes to see, do you understand that the MJ case is not at all comparable to R Kelly and there are reasons and details why? I responded to all your points and brought up all the details, yet you stubbornly insist and think members here might be unironic pedophiles because they don't think he's a pedo (which is a serious accusation that you will never be able to defend properly). Your experience means nothing, you are not in that thread in good faith and are motivated to attack instead of discussing calmly.

That was a completely different user who said that