5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

no way she'd agree to be a part of something as horrible as this

The vibe of these LA performances are far too casual and laid back for anything she'd do

Chile...clown makeup complete. 

 

Not trying to retrofit but that ceremony was so wack and lo-fi that I'm literally glad she didn't participate. I of course wanted her to and would have got my life, but between the sound issues, meh other acts, the whole thing was way below her grade of performance and the sole benefit would have been the size of the audience watching.

19 minutes ago, Redporus said:

16 of you guys in here waiting......for nothing 

16 dollars working all day….

@ScorpiosGroove

1 minute ago, Joaco95 said:

@ScorpiosGroove

1 minute ago, ScorpiosGroove said:

she put crack in Virgo's Groove. that damn snare. I want it right here, right now.

Welp… 

Damn we are down bad.

 

Anyways stream Never Gonna Love Again.

im doing hags work promoting on roblox

 

did she perform?

 

 

Wow that ceremony was one hell of a **** show. Finally a good decision not to participate

2 hours ago, Kristie Kuwa said:

Wow that ceremony was one hell of a **** show. Finally a good decision not to participate

It was terrible. Embarrassingly so. 

 

What I will never get is the rationale behind how and who they get to put this ish together.

 

All stanism aside, who (anyone anywhere) wanted to see any of…that?!

 

I can't really speak for the rock acts and the guests playing with them in the stadium, beyond the fact that I didn't care for it and neither did most of Twitter. But that LA segment was objectively terrible and yet was produced by the producer of the Grammys!

 

I've seen better local award shows, both in Europe and US with way better production value. Way better concept, way better everything. 
 

Just pondering the money and collective effort that went into it and…that is what they came up with? It felt like a cheap episode of Baywatch or California Dreams.

 

Billie (who I don't care for) makes sense pop culturally, but is a prime example of how the biggest acts don't necessarily translate to big performances. Red Hot Chilli Peppers could have played as their song did during the Tom Cruise segment (which looked cheap af btw). Snoop is always a vibe and the California tie-in is natural fit, but it's not event-viewing nor was the Dre surprise. We've pretty much seen the same thing with more production value at the Super Bowl.

 

My gut is telling me maybe this was meant to be relatively lo-fi to not overshadow the host city and also to not overplay their cards now when they'll have to go all out four years from

now. 
 

I also can't shake my feeling that the Bey thing may have been on the cards (hence the rumors), but she's pretty unwavering in the scale of her performance, the rightful need for the segment to be centralised on her, and probably not wanting to share the slot. I saw the runner Michael Johnson (who featured) mention that it all came together pretty recently and was rushed. Maybe it was all a contingency after she pulled out? Who knows, I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if tea to this effect comes out via a TMZ or Page Six soon. 
 

Whatever the case, I'll again say I'm 

glad Bey didn't tie her name to this. It was a mess. 

Edited August 12, 20242 yr by Cbreezy

they were about to have mother standing in front of a dirty shack on a dingy LA beach, glad she stayed home

 

53 minutes ago, Cbreezy said:

It was terrible. Embarrassingly so. 

 

What I will never get is the rationale behind how and who they get to put this ish together.

 

All stanism aside, who (anyone anywhere) wanted to see any of…that?!

 

I can't really speak for the rock acts and the guests playing with them in the stadium, beyond the fact that I didn't care for it and neither did most of Twitter. But that LA segment was objectively terrible and yet was produced by the producer of the Grammys!

 

I've seen better local award shows, both in Europe and US with way better production value. Way better concept, way better everything. 
 

Just pondering the money and collective effort that went into it and…that is what they came up with? It felt like a cheap episode of Baywatch or California Dreams.

 

Billie (who I don't care for) makes sense pop culturally, but is a prime example of how the biggest acts don't necessarily translate to big performances. Red Hot Chilli Peppers could have played as their song did during the Tom Cruise segment (which looked cheap af btw). Snoop is always a vibe and the California tie-in is natural fit, but it's not event-viewing nor was the Dre surprise. We've pretty much seen the same thing with more production value at the Super Bowl.

 

My gut is telling me maybe this was meant to be relatively lo-fi to not overshadow the host city and also to not overplay their cards now when they'll have to go all out four years from

now. 
 

I also can't shake my feeling that the Bey thing may have been on the cards (hence the rumors), but she's pretty unwavering in the scale of her performance, the rightful need for the segment to be centralised on her, and probably not wanting to share the slot. I saw the runner Michael Johnson (who featured) mention that it all came together pretty recently and was rushed. Maybe it was all a contingency after she pulled out? Who knows, I'm just saying I wouldn't be surprised if tea to this effect comes out via a TMZ or Page Six soon. 
 

Whatever the case, I'll again say I'm 

glad Bey didn't tie her name to this. It was a mess. 

I can envision the request and Beys response:

 

"You wish to see me perform on a small stage in front of 100 people at the beach during day time? And I cannot use my team? Hell NAH!"

 

so when's her vegas residency ? 

 

4 hours ago, kimberly said:

did she perform?

 

 

does she currently have any songs charting?

 

11 minutes ago, ScorpiosGroove said:

so when's her vegas residency ? 

 

Stop this 

23 minutes ago, king_queen said:

Stop this 

I definitely believe this: https://nypost.com/2024/07/11/business/beyonce-sphere-end-residency-talks-but-singer-could-land-at-this-sin-city-venue-sources/

 

Quote

Beyoncé, who finished her "Renaissance" tour last September, is now speaking to rival MGM about a possible residency of roughly 100 shows over four years, the sources added.

Everything about this report makes sense. Her refusal to sign on if she can't have stage rehearsals for 2 weeks. The four year time span (covering Acts 2 and 3). Her wanting to raise her kids. It sucks because she's not a legacy artist yet, and Vegas seems best suited to those, but Adele and Gaga have proven you can be relevant and still survive a Vegas residency.

 

I just dont really think it would suit her as a performer tbh? Something about the monotony of the same venue. Idk. There's something magic about her interacting with different cities on tour.

But that being said I definitely think a 100 show Cowboy Carter residency makes sense for her and for the album. Unsure about the four year part tho...

The biggest miss this era was not jumping on A Bar Song (Tipsy) or even keeping it to herself.

 

 

didn't believe that closing ceremony sh^t for even a second

 

2 minutes ago, Draper. said:

The biggest miss this era was not jumping on A Bar Song (Tipsy) or even keeping it to herself.

 

 

She could still do a section on tour with Texas + Pony Up Remix + A Bar Song + Bodyguard to try to match the absolute collapse that was Cuff It + Energy + Break My Soul + Queens Remix live 

1 hour ago, king_queen said:

Stop this 

atp **** it, grandma isn't suddenly becoming fun again anyway so she might as well park her ass in vegas for a couple years, at least that way we'll see her outside of her insta reels 

 

1 hour ago, alien superstore said:

I definitely believe this: https://nypost.com/2024/07/11/business/beyonce-sphere-end-residency-talks-but-singer-could-land-at-this-sin-city-venue-sources/

 

Everything about this report makes sense. Her refusal to sign on if she can't have stage rehearsals for 2 weeks. The four year time span (covering Acts 2 and 3). Her wanting to raise her kids. It sucks because she's not a legacy artist yet, and Vegas seems best suited to those, but Adele and Gaga have proven you can be relevant and still survive a Vegas residency.

 

I just dont really think it would suit her as a performer tbh? Something about the monotony of the same venue. Idk. There's something magic about her interacting with different cities on tour.

I gotta speak loud and proud for team take CC on tour. Her and her family will be fine if she tours for five months and then takes another 18 months off. Let's be so real rn