Harry isnt even copying him in any way, shape or form  

 

People in here calling The Rolling Stones "forgotten".  The ignorance. 

Just watched a Mick Jagger concert, he's not as good as he thinks he is

2 hours ago, Bloodflowers. said:

The washed up Maroon 5 / Nickelback of the ancient century using Harry for relevance, I see

Yall say some really ignorant **** in this forum  The Rolling Stones are the 3rd most acclaimed act of all time only behind The Beatles and Bob Dylan (link:http://www.acclaimedmusic.net/artist/The Rolling Stones.htm)

Comparing them with Nickelback is almost offensive and idgaf about the rolling stones

Rude old man

2 hours ago, Bloodflowers. said:

The washed up Maroon 5 / Nickelback of the ancient century using Harry for relevance, I see

girl thats motley crue not rolling stones

I don’t know, I’m not picking up any “shade”

 

Also, The Rolling Stones are absolutely not forgotten. Their catalog is still receiving millions of streams yearly .

Legend spilled

 

1 hour ago, Dsmrs77 said:

I’m going to give Mick the benefit of the doubt and say that he doesn’t sound shady, but his taste level as of late has been concerning

 

 

Yungblud is better than Harry so this is tea! 

True

I supports facts 

 

Spilled.

End him Mickey

Seethe, hag.

i don't think this is the shade you all think it is. he is saying the only resemblance is superficial (his looks) which he can't help.

Harry Styles you will never be famous 

4 hours ago, Pop Trash said:

Did Mick say Harry is being reductive in the article? It's paywalled so I can't read it. That blurb being shared is not Mick saying Harry is reductive so I'm a little confused. He's literally saying, Harry is my friend and I don't know why we are being compared when he doesn't sound like me or dance like me, he just happens to look like me. He's shown Harry love many times, so I don't see it as being shady? Maybe I'm missing something!

You're not. The title of this thread is completely misleading. 

The way he wasn’t even trying to drag but it came across that way because of how unoroginal Harry is 

 

Girlies in here exposing their own ignorance by claiming The Rolling Stones are irrelevant, but will go write essays on why some pop girl with 2 top ten hits is a forever global icon. 

6 hours ago, Protocol said:

Ignoring how ignorant and delusional it is to say Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones are "forgotten", they have 20M+ monthly listeners on Spotify and their last tour, which ended in 2021 (that's last year for the numerically challenged) grossed $550 million, so even with stan wars'd receipts which seem so ludicrous when discussing a mega iconic band like Rolling Stones in the first place, no, not forgotten or washed up at all.

 

Now WHO the flying **** that is in your avatar, THAT is the question we need an answer to. Because I don't know.

Right. The delusion. Imagine being so out of touch with reality you call TRS forgotten and one of the worst bands of all-time.   Their tour gross makes even Taylor blush.

Not people saying The Rolling Stones are irrelevant when their current streams and recent tour gross are better than so called MPGs. 

A bit of Jagger, a bit of Bowie and some industry connections, he has already won more Grammys for his music than Bowie won in his lifetime.

 

 

Edit: people need to stop with this "Rolling Stones forgotten", when they have 20M monthly listeners on Spotify and 5 songs with more than 400M streams, even though they haven't put out a new studio album since 2016. Some of your faves can't do half of that without a feature.