Letemtalk

You're the one that wanted to make this about the "Jewish perspective". My criticism has always been about the Zionists who are actually supporting the slaughter of children in Gaza, but the people that support the genocide always seem to pretend it's a criticism of Judaism. Judaism and Zionism are quite different as anyone who was around in 2016 will tell you. During the US Presidential primaries, the Zionists in the DNC conspired against the Jewish man, so that the (non-Jewish) Zionist woman would become the Democratic nominee. In recent weeks, Ed Miliband, the UK Foreign Secretary came under fire from prominent Christian Zionists such as US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, accusing the British government of "Jew hate". Miliband is Jewish, Huckabee isn't, but Zionists don't really care about Jews, they only care whether someone supports Israel or not. Then you have the largest Zionist group in America, which is Christians United for Israel, with a membership of millions of evangelical Christians.

Maybe after the last few tours she has enough of a following there to justify some stand-alone shows instead of festivals. I enjoy festivals when there are enough artists I want to see, but they can be frustrating if your favorite artists have to play a reduced set. She has been keeping a low profile recently, almost nothing on social media for a few weeks and Just three more shows in her festival tour.

Are you seriously suggesting that it's a "Jewish perspective" that Israel should be able to murder as many children as they want? That's a disgraceful thing to say, and I'm sure a lot of Jewish people would be disgusted. I'm sure Jack Antonoff would be disgusted by the things you say.

I don't hate Ed or anything and I sometimes fell bad for him. But then I remember he owns close to 30 properties in his U.K. real estate portfolio, worth a total of about £60M, and has a net worth of around $400 million. He's isn't going to lose it all if he says "Free Palestine". Perhaps at worse he wouldn't be able to perform at the biggest venues, but a lot of artists that have said "Free Palestine" (or similar) on stage, are headlining major festivals and performing in other large venues. When the Beatles came to the US in 1964, they found they were scheduled to play in front of a segregated audience in Jacksonville, Florida. They learned the audience was going to be segregated and refused to play. The city officials backed down, and the concert went on with a fully integrated audience. Saying "Free Palestine" in the mid 2020s is like saying "Free Nelson Mandela" in the 1980s. The anti-apartheid movement faced significant opposition in the 1980s, mostly from Republicans in the US and Conservatives in the UK, but most artists were on the right side of history.

I'm not sure why this is controversial when most source agree. US and EU sanctions alone have killed 38 million since 1970. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/article/PIIS2214-109X(25)00278-5/fulltext Then you can add the hundreds of thousands killed as the result of the Iraq war and many others.

Your name should be easy to find with a one word search on google and if it's not, some people might give up searching because they have short attention spans. Karen Marie Aagaard Ørsted Andersen known professionally as MØ is one example. Haven't heard much from her in recent years. Hopefully the writing credits from "Lean On" are paying the bills and she's doing well.

Because Zionists like Pink like to pretend that all criticism of Israel and support for Palestinians is anti-Semitic, when in reality Zionists want to preserve Israeli Jewish ethnic supremacy over Palestinians, Lebanese and other people of the Levant. They want to preserve US and European support for Israel, even when Israel is slaughtering women and children. Hopefully more people like Jack Antonoff speak out.

He is just making it worse. "the most complex political issue on the planet" No it's not complex, when one side is a regional nuclear superpower, backed by the only true global nuclear superpower, and they are dropping bombs on children, you should be on the side of the children. You don't have say that the state of Israel should be destroyed, but you can support the freedom and human rights of the people being bombed and starved.

Thank you Jack Antonoff . I was temped to ask why he was so late in saying this, but it's better to be late than never. Also, Thank You again Macklemore. Thanks to Macklemore, many artists are starting to wake up to the fact that you can't sit of the fence forever, and being "apolitical" is taking a side, because being "apolitical" in a time of injustice, allows the powerful to continue to do what they're doing. She probably won't give a reaction, because when Jews speak out, it destroys the argument that criticism of Israel and support for Palestinians is anti-Semitic.

"What is happened in Gaza is (a) catastrophic" He makes it sound like there was a flood or earthquake or something. Who was responsible for the catastrophe Ed? Also, a "catastrophe" is defined as a sudden event. After almost three years* of slaughter of innocent men, women and children, what is happening in Gaza and the West Bank in 2026 clearly isn't an unplanned sudden event. What a ******* weak speech. * more than three years of course, because it didn't just start in October 2023.

Having you own DNA children is not a human right, and certainly should not be a right in societies where having you own children is unaffordable for poor people. Surrogacy allows rich people like Elon Musk to have a huge number of children, 14 known children so far. But he is not the billionaire with the most children. Chinese billionaire Xu Bo, the founder of one of China's largest mobile gaming companies, has fathered more than 100 children and hopes to have dozens of U.S.-born boys to one day take over his business empire. FortuneChinese billionaire who has fathered more than 100 childr...Xu Bo, the founder of one of China's largest mobile gaming companies, is looking to have "50 high-quality sons" in the U.S. to take over his billion-dollar empire.

P!g will be protected by the Zionists in the industry. Ed on the other hand, was a useful idiot that played his part and can now be ignored. If the rest of the tour flops, or his next album flops, I'm not sure if they will bother to do him any favours, since they probably don't like that he had Macklemore on his tour in the first place. He appears to be signing a new contral with Interscope, so maybe he will do some duets with the Interscope pop girls. I've no idea who still stans Nicki these days. Maybe all her remaining fans are already Maga and Zionists, so it doesn't make any difference.

There are a lot of differences. They make a lot more money and they prioritise making money and winning awards, and they have people employed to ensure they avoid these problems. They also have lucrative product endorsement deals that would be at risk if they upset the wrong people. They would be warned ahead of time if a support artist was likely to speak their mind and they'd take action to ensure that doesn't happen. They have a lot closer contact with the powerful Zionists in the music industry, like Lucian Grainge of Universal, who has attended Friends Of The Israel Defense Forces events, so they are aware of the expectations. Since they are major touring acts, just like Ed Sheeran, they probably have a close relationship with the large venue owners. On the other hand, Roger Waters from Pink Floyd is worth more than $300 million, but is unlikely to ever become a billionaire and I'm sure he doesn't care.

If it was popular and profitable to say "Free Palestine", Taylor Swift and Lady Gaga would be saying it, and a pro-Palestine song would be winning the "Best Song For Social Change" award at the Grammys. Edit: Not an attack on those two women, you can probably add plenty of other big mainstream major label artists, with strong industry connections, who have huge mainstream audiences that include moderates and republican listeners.

Is this a new trend now, where all the wealthy white celeb woman are having a child via surrogate?