1 hour ago, MonsterNavy said:

the fact that all of these are fraudulent

how did these talentless uglies managed to get 7 #1s and not a single one is known 

 

 

Dynamite and My Universe were pretty big hits in my country + Savage Love smashed, but the original version, not this remix. I've never heard the rest of their #1s.

50 minutes ago, family.guy123 said:

Well this is closer to what people on this site want the hot 100 to be like considering they hate radio so much 

People want to see radio weighted less, but who asked for fraudulent sales and mediocre streams to top the chart? 

The Hot 100 is a joke lmao.

 

Wonder what the cause is for their selective chart manipulation when it comes to certain acts? Cause they're avid to change the rules in other circumstances.

 

And the cherry on top is the fact that "Gangnam Style" -a cultural phenomenom- never was #1. 

Just now, Cz! said:

The Hot 100 is a joke lmao.

 

Wonder what the cause is for their selective chart manipulation when it comes to certain acts? Cause they're avid to change the rules in other circumstances.

 

And the cherry on top is the fact that "Gangnam Style" -a cultural phenomenom- never was #1. 

Bts fans are better at strategizing the exact actions needed to reach their goals

I’ll never forgive Billboard for discrediting Levitating’s sales when they pull stuff like this for other artists

1 hour ago, dabunique said:

u guys r truly da worst when it comes to anything BTS related

 

its legal to do it, go mass buy Miley or SZA  if u mad 

I remember when people doubted Evermore would chart for 100 weeks. There is truly nothing impossible for her. The original music industry! 

good stable which is a very sign

4 minutes ago, fridayteenage said:

Bts fans are better at strategizing the exact actions needed to reach their goals

Hmm I worded that badly. I was refering to Billboard's sketchy policy on discerning what is an organic hit and what isn't. Obviously they know what they are doing.

 

Fans going bankrupt just to see their fave artificially topping populatiry charts is something I will never understand, nor want to.

34 minutes ago, Sinister said:

You hate songs staying long in the top 10, but you want reinstatement of UGC streams?

Songs are staying too long in the Top 10 because radio is overweighed and holds onto songs way past their expiration date. Plus, we never had a song spend more than 60 weeks on the chart after the 25/52 rule was reinstated and before UGC streams were removed. The only ones that went past 52 weeks were Uptown Funk (because of the Super Bowl), Shape of You, Perfect, and Sunflower (and that one fell off after Week 53). [Someone You Loved made it past 52 weeks, but its final weeks were after UGC was removed.]

 

Adding UGC streams back and lowering the weight of radio will move the charts faster.

Edited April 3, 20233 yr by pride4jc1222

how many BB200 points did she rake up just in these two weeks 

Nobody does it like her. Nobody.  

I remember that time Tom from Stereogum came at BTS's number one songs, calling all of them (outside of dynamite) fraudulent.

 

I don't think I've seen a Twitter lashing so vicious and brutal before 

 

Their fans tore him a new one, whew. I don't think Billboard wants that smoke. Nothing is scarier (online) than preteen girls with a stan card and reliable internet connection. 

2 hours ago, Renan90 said:

 

i see 2 good songs, this chart is awful

She's unstoppable 

Agree, they should only count the top performing

THEE music industry 

#35 on streaming sings and 10m streams  this has to be some kind of record for a #1

hoping for #1 - OUT 

Also, it would be great if radio gave more songs the BMS treatment and drop them after 8-10 weeks, just like 1970s radio. It would create faster turnover and keep the charts fresher.

the music industry winning as always

Has any other tour in history ever had an impact like that? This is just insane 

players another week in top 10

Has 2 weeks of almost an entire discography in the Top 40 ever even happened for an artist that died? MJ?