Undeniably so. 

Not really - she's only had 3 successful eras with some nice droplets but that's far from legend 

To me she kinda is tbh 

1 hour ago, Shimenawa said:

She needed her Emancipation but sadly it never happened.

 

Maybe it's coming?

No. She's a 2000s pop icon.

Yes - even though her sales/stats arent that impressive her looks/image and first 3 albums are standouts

they call her legend x for a reason 

No. 

LOL no

No. An icon for sure. Her success was too short lived to be a legend. & the window has closed for any kind of comeback. 

of course not sis 

Nah. An icon of her time though for sure. 

Maybe in the future but her impact in today's music landscape is real.

 

There are many better singers than her but everybody recognize the Xtina singing style.

She is called Legend X/LegendTina for a reason

 

 

She's not called Legend X for nothing 

Yes legend, yes xtine 

Not even close

 

 

 

7 hours ago, Sharamee6 said:

Christina - 4 octaves

Ariana - 4 octaves

Adele - 3 octaves

Kelly Clarkson - 3 octaves

 

If you don't understand vocal range please don't preach about it. Today, Christina can sing better at 42 than Mariah was at 42; and she is certainly a much much much better singer than Kelly C. and Adele, going by proven scientific data in vocal range and the lengths she can reach with her voice, NOT opinion). Sustaining vocal chords/range is also equally important. Ariana is on her way to achieve legendary status, her chest power isn't strong or deep as Christina's neither is her enuncation, but she's already iconic AF. Stay bitter. I feel very sorry for you.

I’ll give you Adele, and we can argue about Ariana but not too much on Kelly! What’s she may lack in power belting, she makes up in her musicality and her versatility that we see on a weekly basis.

8 hours ago, Hallad173 said:

I’ll give you Adele, and we can argue about Ariana but not too much on Kelly! What’s she may lack in power belting, she makes up in her musicality and her versatility that we see on a weekly basis.

Don't get me wrong I am actually a huge Kelly fan I love her, but in terms of impact on pop culture (world-wide), she's nowhere near the level of Xtina's impact at her peak. (X had voice, music videos,  collabs, fashion statements  and controversy all on lock). 

Edited February 23, 20233 yr by Sharamee6

10 hours ago, Hallad173 said:

I’ll give you Adele, and we can argue about Ariana but not too much on Kelly! What’s she may lack in power belting, she makes up in her musicality and her versatility that we see on a weekly basis.

Sis Kelly is known for her powerful belts.  Kelly is top tier. Christina could only wish to belt with half the power and ease that Kelly does 

Edited February 23, 20233 yr by KCFan2014

18 hours ago, Sharamee6 said:

Christina - 4 octaves

Ariana - 4 octaves

Adele - 3 octaves

Kelly Clarkson - 3 octaves

 

If you don't understand vocal range please don't preach about it. Today, Christina can sing better at 42 than Mariah was at 42; and she is certainly a much much much better singer than Kelly C. and Adele, going by proven scientific data in vocal range and the lengths she can reach with her voice, NOT opinion). Sustaining vocal chords/range is also equally important. Ariana is on her way to achieve legendary status, her chest power isn't strong or deep as Christina's neither is her enuncation, but she's already iconic AF. Stay bitter. I feel very sorry for you.

Kelly wipes the floor with Christina. Always has always will! Let's not even bring up 2023 lmao Christina can't even belt above an Eb5

Not yet, 2 great album then yes, 

but for now she’s the Legend Of The United States.

She has more impact than her peers with less 'successful' eras. She IS a legend. All the young artists look up to her and are INSPIRED by her. that is what a LEGEND is.

No, but she is an influential pop icon and a vocal legend in her own right, which is every hard to get, not everyone has that

Edited February 23, 20233 yr by Blackout2006

Legend, no. Household name, yes.