Choose wisely 

This set up  
 

Tate probably has more technical skill but peak Britney is peak Britney

 

 

Tate. But Britney's voice is much more pleasing and hit-worthy

Britney now (2023) < Tate now (2023) < Britney at her peak (late 90s, early 00s) < Tate at her peak (upcoming)

y'all are going too far now

mods need to ban this girl

 

Britney and her little peak 1998-2004 > Tate > Britney (2004-)

 

But we'll see in the future if Tate will overtake her

Btw, does Tate sing live or playback the entire concert like Britney?

Tate is better and more versatile. 

Tate even if its a trained dancer and amazing in her own way and highly technical she doesnt have the charisma of peak britney. 

There was something so magical about early britney and her performances. There was fire within. Angel.  Like magnetism
Tate performance feel too calculated "look at me im dancing, look at me im serving main pop girl, look at me please, the dancer"
Tate voice is also too conventional sadly. Britney vocals are really special and unique. This comparison feels disrespectful dahling.

 

If there's someone with Britney performing charisma today. Thats Tinashe. She shines and her dancing is natural to her

Edited November 21, 20232 yr by AvadaKedavra

Lowkey Tate, but Britney had an aura to her and better stage presence. She always stood out from her dancers. 

7 minutes ago, Starshine said:

Lowkey Tate,

very extremely minusculey tremendously puny tiny very very very very low low low low low low low low low LOW key, I guess 

britney, sweetie  that tate girl looks really forced when dancing 

2 minutes ago, Blank Space said:

britney, sweetie  that tate girl looks really forced when dancing 

You're literally lying here. Tate was literally a dancer all her life and it was her main occupation before singing. This is her specialist field don't disrespect her like that 

1 minute ago, Timeless said:

You're literally lying here. Tate was literally a dancer all her life and it was her main occupation before singing. This is her specialist field don't disrespect her like that 

 

well, that's my opinion 

 

threads like this will be fun to bump once miss tatemcrae is long gone and forgotten in like 18 months 

They both have great dance skills, but Britney is just prettier. Britney owned the early 2000s with her dancing and looks 

britney 

 

the other gives background dancer energy

I see why some fans are choosing Tate

but she only looks that way because that is her Choeography's Aim

 

ATRL usually cant tell who is a good dancer exactly because they cant distinguish dancing Ability to dancing Material

I only found out about Miss Tate yesterday, and so far, what I've seen of her hasn't wowed me, and her sounding like Camilla gets her a -100 point deduction.

 

So Britney Spears is the only correct answer, I fear.

 

No Taylor Swift is. 

Tate is a professionally trained dancer so I guess she is better than Britney but I think she actually does too much even though she is obviously very skilled. I liked Britney's chill, confident dancing style at her peak, she did her thing but didn't try to do 500 moves per second. 

Please.

Britney is the blueprint, Tate does a good imitation but she will never have Britney's stage presence and charisma.

Tate looks spastic compared to Britney lol. She has horrible choreography and Britney was just as technical. Britney had amazing isolation, always held the pose, had a unique sense of hitting the beat and always made sure to serve face. She knew what her body looked like and always made sure her hands all the way to her toes were in place. 
 

Dancing trends have changed, that's all. Tate is not a more "technical" dancer by any stretch of the imagination; not in any of the material she has actually shown through her own work, anyway. If she has any video where she IS showing off her technical capabilities, I'd love to see it because I'm actually very excited about her

Which Britney Spears are we talking about ? The one chillin' at home or the one touring in Brazil ?