RihannaRTT

Maybe it was Michael's evil spirit that asked that user to post the first Stephanie thread

Stands for nothing, falls for everything

I do not really think this was fair because a) they should have just shopped it around to museums in the first place instead of making it an accessible auction and b) if a UK celebrity bought it, it would just be sitting in their home too, not really contributing anything to the nation, so what's the difference? The auction shouldn't have been open publicly if this was going to be an issue. Par for the course for an english museum to take something from someone else though Her ChatGPT subscription

Well, it literally was buyable, as part of an auction.

The way she actually deserved this ring. A private business is well within their rights to not sell to you but why is the government stepping in to stop your bag?? 2012.... oh it's a Tory government. shocker.

Kelly's one of my few pop faves but we really don't have to defend her or any other rich celebrity when she's in the wrong. When the other customers in the store are looking at YOU funny as you flail your arms around, that's the ultimate biggest sign that you're the problem. And regardless of what happened in the store, that became erased when you take it to millions of followers in an attempt to mount public pressure. The store's retaliatory interviews and promotion are very crass and makes it harder to feel sorry for them but ultimately they wouldn't have happened if Kelly just never posted about it and just left and googled the bird to buy one online like a normal person instead of rummaging through 10 year old notebooks to find her twitter password. I don't understand why "hi I'd like to buy that bird", "it's not for sale", "oh... ok im leaving, bye" was so hard.

What I'm gathering from the "culture vulture" accusations and the comments here is that she's seen as a legend within the black community so gaga's black manager inviting her only for gaga to then not gaf during the performance is what cemented her view. Maybe slightly egotistical but after the experience with the photoshoot too, I can understand it as the negative experiences compound further. In saying that, I'm not siding with a transphobe so Gaga wins today.

This unironically being her only remaining chance

Kacey whacking her and Ella landing the finishing blow by untagging herself and then liking Kacey's original post. Begone Krusti whoever you are

6.8 is pretty accurate. Snakeskin Boots, Crisco, Cowgirl Curtsy, Cuttin' Onions and I'll Have to Say I Love You in a Song are all truly excellent and then... well, there's the rest of the album. Nothing really bad but just fine. Postcards from Texas was kinda perfect so this is a big step down for me.

I don't think it has. You probably just have a warped perception because of literally crazy stans that think viciously defending, or sending death threats to critics of, their favorite mostly untalented label-shaped artists is something normal people do, and most stans just happen to be gay. That behaviour comes from stanning though, not from being gay. In real life, gay people are no less toxic/superficial than any other group of the population.

Zelensky needs to take out a few more data centers to stop the bots Yeah this is ALL on Ticketmaster because they are the biggest ticket provider and could do this and choose not to. This is the simplest and best solution. I also agree with the "sell at the venue" people but I think maybe like 10-20% of the tickets should be kept for that, not them all because its not accessible for all. Meanwhile I completely disagree with "top fans on apple music/spotify". Most people aren't deranged enough to only listen to one artist like idiotic stans - and mind you, a scalper could also probably bot plays to become a top listener. Also while it won't affect Raye, in general it would disadvantage people with an older or more general audience, say Madonna, Cher or Shania.

biting??

The store vs Seto Kelly

A isn't ******* around. Hope he's okay.

Kelly I love you but this was kinda Karen Clarkson more than Kelly Clarkson Tired of the "small business" excuse though when many of these small businesses are trash and use AI (Kelly's fav) or 3d printing slop. Being a small business is not a shield for any and all criticism. Hopefully the business can learn from this, because whether or not you agree with her public call out, profiling is a horrible way to treat your customers. No one looks good here really.

That they were good people, and ultra talented. For the vast majority of them, especially pop artists, that was a fallacy. You'd find more talent at a local theatre performance or karaoke bar; and they'd probably be better people too in all likelihood. Also re the OP; yeah the phones was dumb but there are some things they only use once; often clothes.

He deserves another slap

i pretend i do not see it

Not the backfire. Feeling so threatened you have to gas up claims that you don't actually care about that then also got resolved in like an hour. It's giving those two users always making random ridiculous threads about Jay-Z. Seek therapy ya'll, it's never that serious especially over a majorly positive thing like ... a charity festival. it's bad for some people right now and those people aren't olivia it seems. Good that it was cleared up because the actual important thing is the good charitable work done by this festival's performers and organisers.

Ultimately the matter is two-fold. No, he is not wholly responsible for the output That haS been released recently. We are not going to suddenly pretend especially from the biggest pop artists, that their work isn't exactly what they want to put out. It's true a producer's job is to enhance an artist's vision (or clear lack thereof in recent times) and there's a common denominator in some of them releasing utter shite for this entire decade and it's not exactly Max Martin. It's obvious some people want to blame their fave's failings entirely on him as if they haven't blamed it on 3 other different producers the last few years too. But the other thing is... he also didn't say no. Surely he knew those songs and productions were bad and yet he greenlit them to be released anyway. And it's also not like this is his only fumble given he's now part of 2 of 3 of the lowest MC female albums - and both within the last two years. This does also say something (featuring xtina); after 30 years in the game, his output, as well as those two ladies, has fallen significantly due to... possibly becoming out of touch as new music trends take shape, or possibly just a laziness and lack of drive after hitting it big time for so long. Ultimately whatever the artist puts out IS on the artist, but yeah regardless of those two cases, he's not quite what he was and that's ok after 30 years really. Most of the "iconic" artists after 30 years aren't putting out thought-provoking masterpieces either, so it's not an exclusively him issue.

No shade to her but doesn't he charge like... 20 million per song or something ridiculous and for - looks at 143 and slow girl - THAT level of output... Good for her really.

82% pure sales drop is quite funny to brag about considering a second week drop last year. Something much more recent than a 13 year old album

One of these names is not like the others