RihannaRTT

The worst statement of all time. "B-but the venues are the real villa-" NO **** this ginger rat too

Sounds like he does take sides, just not when it involves billionaire's money

Scientology is a cult beginning with s... interesting.

Is... is there a none option? Taylor was good from 2006 to 2014 and exactly 2020 at least...

Why are some of these users (G / S / H for a start) not banned yet? Surely promoting zionism and defending a genocide comes under the ZTP?

backfire so bad its giving charlie kirk

This is so disrespectful to Next to Me

The early posts defending Ed Sheeran look extremely ridiculous now. He had plenty time until now to echo Macklemore's sentiments and support him but chose not to, to protect his sharting bottom line. Pig. "I don't take sides" people are the worst. "I'm apolitical" *****, music IS political. If you're going to stand there and sing, at least stand for something. **** you Ed, Ticketmaster, LiveNation, these venues, P!nk, Israel, people defending ed, pink or this situation, and that ugly wish-they-were-gorgeous user that should be have been banned thrice over by now.

Oof. But ultimately this is on whoever did the casting in the first place. Surely whoever made that decision would know in 2026 that those names would attract A) scalpers and B) crazy stans with no theatre etiquette who don't care about the play but think theyre getting a personal concert. Both resulting in actual fans of the play being ticketless. Congrats casting director, you played yourself.

god i ******* wish. we need OUT before england lets reform into government. there's also no reason why our english gammon overlords should have a say in what referendums we can and can't hold.

and they don't even larp doing that correctly either! This isn't particularly surprising, I noticed when they were trying to ban Mamdani from the 9-11 events. I'd say it's happening globally too. You have racist gammons with signs in England that say "hey migrant leave those kids alone" and constant talk of "grooming gangs" pushing the narrative that only muslims are rapists, as if they're not being riled up and pushed by... a party filled with white rapists and supporters of the likes of Tommy Robinson, Andrew Tate, and the US president (more white rapists).

Altruistic surrogacy is absolutely better than commercial surrogacy, although it's none of my business either way if all parties are consenting. Generally, I find that being anti-surrogacy as a whole is a right-wing take that heavily rooted in homophobia and transphobia while being disguised as left-wing under the veil of "protecting women" without actually giving any autonomy to the surrogates themselves. It also feels inherently connected to the pro-life movement and JK Rowling's TERFism movements, often relying on the same base arguments, so it's not surprising that all three are rising at the same time. Being anti-Commercial Surrogacy is fairer usually due to the lack of protections and similar concerns in the US. But here's the thing; the problem there isn't the surrogacy, the problem is the USA in general.

If either weren't greedy, they wouldn't still be a billionaire

Birth with a Smile Congrats literal Mother

tee hee