Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ATRL

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.
Login issues
RIP Dolly Parton ❤️

Most Disgusting Copyright Claim?

Featured Replies

I think Hayley Williams wins this one. I still find it the most disgusting to force herself to get credited in one of Olivia Rodrigo's classics. Imagine preying on a teenager just because they're vulnerable and lacking experience.

 

How about yours? 

  • Replies 25
  • Views 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • She should thank Olivia regularly now she can rent her apartment fee every month.

  • Right? I blame Hayley for ruining Olivia's chances to win AOTY at the Grammys. 

  • Gosh. This makes me more mad. I hope Olivia obliterates in her next era.

Nah, I stand with hayley. These little girls who think they can just rip from whoever should definitely get hit in the pocketbook.

 

It's serving girl who puts stickers on her binder and thinks she's creative.

 

RryALlk.thumb.jpg.4321896c20de2e91d9aa66

 

 

 

Hayley made sense but the Taylor copyright to deja vu was not fair and disgusting 

Hayley was correct 100% lol. Mine would be Get Free/Creep. They tried it and lost. :clap3:

36 minutes ago, Jude said:

I think Hayley Williams wins this one. I still find it the most disgusting to force herself to get credited in one of Olivia Rodrigo's classics. Imagine preying on a teenager just because they're vulnerable and lacking experience.

 

How about yours? 

Deffo agree

Taylor really fell into my eyes when she also did this, but she at least has helped artists as a whole on some matter

however for both of them, to do this to an Upcoming new artist hitting it big! FOUL..especially when Tay is such a huge money maker already :deadbanana: not surprised Olivia distanced herself (from what I've heard)

 

24 minutes ago, naval23 said:

Hayley made sense but the Taylor copyright to deja vu was not fair and disgusting 

 

1 minute ago, Rev8 said:

Deffo agree

Taylor really fell into my eyes when she also did this, but she at least has helped artists as a whole on some matter

however for both of them, to do this to an Upcoming new artist hitting it big! FOUL..especially when Tay is such a huge money maker already :deadbanana: not surprised Olivia distanced herself (from what I've heard)

 

Why is this narrative STILL being pushed?? We heard from a quote from Jack’s mouth that one day they were just told through the grapevine that she was giving them credit. They didn’t push for it or anything. I can’t speak to the Paramore credit, but maybe she just got anxious from the threat of the first similarity and gave the other credit for inspiration just in case. She already credited them both for her interpolation of New Years Day, so she probably felt on her own that she was inspired enough by CS on DV (though I do agree, there is very little similarity there imo)

35 minutes ago, Jude said:

I think Hayley Williams wins this one. I still find it the most disgusting to force herself to get credited in one of Olivia Rodrigo's classics. Imagine preying on a teenager just because they're vulnerable and lacking experience.

 

How about yours? 

I get Hayley a little. Olivia was a vulnerable teenager who had no experience in legal matters, Hayley took that chance to get the credit. If I was a struggling artist who hasn't had a hit since 2007 I would probably do the same lol that's easy money she got millions out of it.

 

OT: aside from good 4 you Blurred Lines was one of the worst because it set a really bad precedent in music copyright claims

both the olivia ones seemed like complete BS. And Iʻm a huge Taylor/Paramore fan.

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Rev8 said:

Deffo agree

Taylor really fell into my eyes when she also did this, but she at least has helped artists as a whole on some matter

however for both of them, to do this to an Upcoming new artist hitting it big! FOUL..especially when Tay is such a huge money maker already :deadbanana: not surprised Olivia distanced herself (from what I've heard)

 

What an intelligent take. :clap3:

  • Author
1 minute ago, krustysalt said:

I get Hayley a little. Olivia was a vulnerable teenager who had no experience in legal matters, Hayley took that chance to get the credit. If I was a struggling artist who hasn't had a hit since 2007 I would probably do the same lol that's easy money she got millions out of it.

She should thank Olivia regularly now she can rent her apartment fee every month. :clap3:

  • Author
Just now, GraceRandolph said:


This lady trying to sue Gaga over Judas.

Sounds like an Xtina song. :rip:

I stand with Hayley. Untalented thieves like Olivia need to be stopped. 

  • Author
Just now, commander said:

The Paramore/Olivia thing was almost infuriating. 

Right? I blame Hayley for ruining Olivia's chances to win AOTY at the Grammys. 

The musical similarities between misery business and good 4 u are minimal.
Adam Neely nailed the analysis here.

 

 

The chord progression is a IV-I-V-vi chord loop, which is a variation of I-V-vi-IV, the most overused chord progression in pop.

Skip forward to 6:08 for the other song that really "rips off" misery business.

 

No one should be surprised to learn that Olivia got rid of the management team that agreed to those ridiculous claims.

 

Blurred Lines is another one.

  • Author
1 minute ago, Letemtalk said:

The musical similarities between misery business and good 4 u are minimal.
Adam Neely nailed the analysis here.

 

 

The chord progression is a IV-I-V-vi chord loop, which is a variation of I-V-vi-IV, the most overused chord progression in pop.

Skip forward to 6:08 for the other song that really "rips off" misery business.

 

No one should be surprised to learn that Olivia got rid of the management team that agreed to those ridiculous claims.

 

Blurred Lines is another one.

Gosh. This makes me more mad. I hope Olivia obliterates in her next era. :fish2:

2 minutes ago, Letemtalk said:

No one should be surprised to learn that Olivia got rid of the management team that agreed to those ridiculous claims.

She did? Good 4 her 

paramore & taylor stealing from olivia...

 

and the worst thing is people saying they're right because olivia's songs "have the same vibes" as their songs like?? :deadbanana4: since when do we give songwriting credits based on "vibes"? is every angsty teen girl with a guitar gonna have to credit paramore from now on? is every singer that yells in a song gonna have to credit taylor and her squad?  

 

olivia only gave them credits because of the pressure & mismanagement.. good thing she fired her team and signed with one of the biggest managers in the industry 

mariah copywriting christmas or something. idr the exact phrase but it was something to do with xmas. not her having the monopoly on xmas. chile

John Fogerty being sued for sounding too much like John Fogerty is the most iconic waste of a court's time over music-based copyright claims.

Account

Navigation

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.