smartalek22

Looks like even the most beloved and "morally righteous" celebs as declared by Stan Twitter care the most about what you call "skin deep" so it doesn't matter.

What is this biased ass voting cuz Yes, But American Life is Bigger Is Better I have to fear

All

It's her top 8 for sure

I can't ever imagine there ever being a consensus as to what counts as an "old" song/album and how long one is allowed to chart before being artificially limited in some way. It's controversial as is in countries with some kind of system like this in place. There will just be 2 charts (one for new one for old) that neither is representative of what people actually are consuming. e.

Not really true for the ones I've met

An American style halftime show at a global event.

Absolutely not and I avoid gays who have a pet owner "best friend".

Fake accents when done right can be very cvnty like

Every thread on here is either let me mention my fav or let me mention my anti

Link to the Instagram page?

You're moving the goalpost. And there are likewise a lot of people that harm other humans for no reason. The relevance to the question in OP being?

You are…saying this to a Palestinian girl. You know that? What makes you think that weird bidet comment is the go to insult to throw at any random internet user?

Is this the new "is Katy Perry the new Paula Abdul?"?

Ariana grande didn't even do it this blatantly somehow Cardi B is automatically granted Stan immunity from any draggings just because stans hate her "arch enemy" much more

Funniest thing is some of the comments come from fanbases who love to downplay the Hot 100 in favour of a "global" arguement for their favs……but suddenly when their favs are out-globaled their pre-programming didn't know how to react. And the audacity at "solo"

You want to talk about solo songs on the billboard hot 100? …really? You bringing this specific goalpost up unprovoked? You really want to?

yes absolutely

Trained guide dogs for the disabled typically behave quite well. Exceptions don't overide the commonplace thought, which is careless owners letting their pets move around and piss everywhere.

Even a relatively recent, currently active artist like Olivia Rodrigo didn't because it goes 2026—>2021—>2023 for her

Yes, absolutely. I despise human kids. What now? None of it changes the fact of what I've said in my previous responses. I'm not biased enough to let my personal feelings affect my judgement unlike some of you.

What's the point of replying to this type of dumb fun threads as pretentiously as you usually choose Taylor albums OT: Matt Bomer

Midnights by far

It's been decades at this point, for some reason Mariah completely gave up the rest of the world after Charmbracelet. TEOM literally sold less than Charm in some markets outside of US of A despite 3x the total sales

I think you're still hung up on the fact that you see it as a sort of transaction. You pay for your kids and then you expect them to repay you. But that's not how (functioning) parents see it. They may or may not. They may or may not have the economic means to while simultaneously taking care of themselves and their own kids. They may or may not have elderly care and elderly home infrastructure that can ease their burden. This is actually increasingly a pressure on developed and fast developing non-American countries. But this is not even the point. The point is people are not actively thinking about that when they decide to have kids. They are not looking for a return on investment.