anastasha

Well he didn't actually give this rating, this other guy did. Clearly doesn't care about the album enough to do a video review and/or cba with the stan reactions to a low rating and so let someone who liked it for some reason review it instead.

Turns out experiencing one of your concerts having a bomb set off killing many people can make someone anxious and evasive, who would've thought. It would've been kind for Elvira to think about recent events of the time to put Ariana's behaviour into context but that's not as juicy I guess.

Not a defense of Taylor, but it's wild to place yourself as giving righteous critique whilst claiming Tina Fey's feminism is legitimate and that she puts her money where her mouth is. Her entire career has been dependent on her drive to drag other women down, and that's without getting into her racism.

Probably not fans, but racist right-wingers incentivised by the controversy and trying to make a point? Definitely. Look at all those ghost ticket sales for the weird right-wing propaganda movie. Empty theatres but all sold-out + openly doing fundraisers to buy those tickets.

I thought Rihanna was the best-selling artist that emerged in this century... What a BS way to measure success, seems like a stan list based on what the person wants.

I feel like I watched something completely different to everyone else, she was okay - serviceable, but nowhere near incredible or amazing.

It's fine for victims to forgive their abusers, it's essential for their healing. I'm not 'victimising' her, she is a victim of him, he nearly killed her. I was separately saying that she has frequently supported piece of **** men since, so clearly (like many women) has internalised misogyny and trauma, which is understandable. Just say you hate women and think those who abuse us shouldn't ever face repercussions or be held accountable.

Or she's still harbouring after-effects of the abuse, her tendency to sympathise with abusive/violent/pos men shows that to be true. Also, he nearly killed her. Gross to refer holding someone to account for that as 'holding a grudge'.

Look up the cycle of abuse; it's not uncommon, and sadly expected, that victims will go back to their abusers. I'm pretty sure the number is 7, it takes 7 times for a victim to actually get away from their abuser.

She's defended him before, between defending/praising him and saying she prioritises her husband over her child... she's just a dumb pick-me.

Just say you don't understand the law and move along.

Just ask people whether they're more homophobic or misogynistic... or who they hate more, gay men or women... because that's the real root of the question lbr.

I think it's okay to exclude all the 'identities' made up just so completely average people can convince themselves they're oppressed because they're only attracted to intelligent people or other dumb things like that.

It's an act of violence, and as I said, it just teaches children that physical retaliation is the way forward rather than verbal communication. This is how you get emotionally un/under-developed children who can't talk or understand their own feelings and lash out well into adulthood.

Teaching your children that physical violence is a suitable response or reaction to disagreements or doing something 'wrong' is not the way to go. It's usually an indication that the parent is emotionally immature and underdeveloped tbh. It means THEY cannot control their emotions.

This is disgusting, and the teacher should be fired on the grounds that they're exposing students to their (the teacher) sexual fetish... because that's clearly what this is.

The atmosphere is owed to his vocals primarily, even with all the same theatrics the atmosphere would be different is he was lipping to a studio track; it’s quite frankly embarrassing when artists do that, it sucks the life out of a performance imo. I think any reasonable person would understand a show needs to end if issues that can’t be solved in the moment arise. The show must go on, yes, when the issues are fixable.

Some artists have artistic integrity, some don't.

Stans continue being easily pleased.

M.J. Bassett is trans so they're not doing a great job of un-woking it in that regard.

That's not accurate though. Say 1,000 fans bought 5,000 copies of a song between them. But there's another song that had been streamed by 2,000 people to an equivalent of 4,000 copies (of sales). Sure the song with the actual sales is 1,000 higher when it comes to 'copies', but the one dependent on streams had a wider reach of people. The people that bought the 5,000 copies are not consuming the first song, it's sitting in their folders un-downloaded and unplayed, unlike the stream-sales equivalent which represents active consumption of the second song.

But she wasn't, and her identity as a woman is integral to the significance of her story. If someone wanted to reimagine her story, then they should have, but with a made-up figure similar to her and borrowed aspects from her story rather than misrepresenting who she is as a historical figure.

The misogyny in the replies to the tweet and in this very thread is vile. You all need help for how much you hate women.

Black American people who are disabled were calling this out, so the narrative some of you are rolling with to invalidate it... saying "only white people are saying this" etc is incredibly damaging and showing that you don't value them or their thoughts/feelings. It is offensive, and despite the claims that it's different in AAVE context, it's not; even in that context, the origin of the word matches what the slang use is describing. It's not a word where the meaning or link has changed over the years, the meaning always directly links back to what makes it offensive in any use it's had.

I wish I could listen but I can't find it anywhere