I did not like the second one much even though I was told before watching it that it's better. What about you guys?

They're both below average but the first one is a tad more on the mediocre side while the second one is outright awful.

I love the both, light hearted fun movies, the first one is better imo.

First one is a bit better

Edited December 31, 20223 yr by PopKills

Hard to say, both were very good. I heard there was going to be a third movie if the 2nd did well enough, but I guess that was not the case.

Both good, but I will go for the first part because of that scene:
 

 

52 minutes ago, XxxKatyCatxxX said:

Both good, but I will go for the first part because of that scene:
 

 

Now this is the definition of “giving the gays everything they want” 

 

what a flawless *****  

Maleficient 2. I could never finish the first one, i feel like it goes nowhere sometimes

The first one is one of Disney's most interesting live-action adaptations (to date), and quite a fascinating take on the villain to anti-hero trajectory (Cruella would be a far inferior movie if it did not have Maleficent to learn from). I also think it has some surprisingly complex undertones that older individuals can pick up on, in regards to feminism, autonomy and claiming or re-claiming it for oneself.

 

The second one is a Winx club x Lord of The Rings crossover that deserves to be laughed at.

 

 

I prefer the first one. The second one while still good wasn't as good as the first. However the scene when Maleficent visits the castle to have a "normal" dinner was hilarious 

I think I seen that a part 3 was being filmed? 

The first one cuz Brenton Thwaites played Prince Phillip in it 

2 hours ago, AbeHicks said:

Hard to say, both were very good. I heard there was going to be a third movie if the 2nd did well enough, but I guess that was not the case.

There is going to be a third installment indeed. The 2nd one wasn't a flop by any means, either (it grossed almost $500M).

whichever features this iconic hymn

 

the 1st one

First one obviously

The first one

 

The second was cute but gave nothing new or exciting ir interesting to the table

1 hour ago, ninasayers said:

There is going to be a third installment indeed. The 2nd one wasn't a flop by any means, either (it grossed almost $500M).

Really, a third one is being planned? I thoroughly enjoyed both the first and the second part so I definitely will go watch the third movie as well!

3 hours ago, ninasayers said:

They're both below average but the first one is a tad more on the mediocre side while the second one is outright awful.

This.  Trying to turn Maleficent into a good character that was just misunderstood was a choice.  They could have done so much with a darker/more mature version of these movies. The fact that the original ANIMATED film had more depth and adult themes is just... 

1st one. simply because of this Oscar deserving scene

 

 

 

50 minutes ago, popmusicisdead said:

1st one. simply because of this Oscar deserving scene

 

 

 

An actress. 

 

OT: the first one, although the second one is really enjoyable too.

 

The first one was kinda dark and intriguing at times whereas the latter was straight-up garbage. 

having seen both just once in theatres, upon first viewing i liked Maleficent 2 more. but will have to rewatch

2 had Michel Pfeiffer so it wins . 

6 hours ago, GrandeVersace said:

The first one was kinda dark and intriguing at times whereas the latter was straight-up garbage. 

The first one would've been amazing if the viewer was completely unfamiliar with the original Sleeping Beaty and Maleficent in particular.

The second one was like a super hero movie on steroids.