1 minute ago, Distantconstellation said:

How many are those from Toxic though?  Again no one is arguing that toxic isnt a huge song but the rest of the album has terrible streams. 

The era was cut short and only had 3 singles. Everytime is also a cult classic and a well known pop girl ballad with more than 100M streams. 

 

Do you expect a 2003 album to have all album tracks above 20 million streams or something?

1 minute ago, Distantconstellation said:

How many are those from Toxic though?  Again no one is arguing that toxic isnt a huge song but the rest of the album has terrible streams. 

every time streams are not THAT bad plus breath on me and other tracks has fine streams

no toxic

Edited May 13, 20224 yr by foreverwinter13
wrong thread

Help the good sis out and stream this underrated BOP 

 

 

10 minutes ago, BionicWooHoo said:

Bloodshy and avant did that!!! And none for ms spears bc she didn’t write or produce any part of that song 

Britney makes more money not lifting a pen than any royalties Xtina sees from writing her songs

Also, Toxic isn't responsible for 90% of ITZ's streams. Toxic has approx. 757M streams, Everytime alone has 107M. I know as an Xtina stan you're not good in math, but that means that even if ITZ only had Toxic and Everytime in it, Toxic would still only compromise approx. 86% of the album's streams

Edited May 13, 20224 yr by brazil

6 minutes ago, Jay07 said:

Isn't Beautiful, Christina's signature song, credited solely to Linda Perry?

Except it’s Christina’s voice that earned the song a Grammy. And Christina also has signature song Dirrty where she has songwriting and producing credits AND despite being slutshamed in America was a smash in Europe and still earned a Grammy nom. 

 

when Christina doesn’t have a song writing or producing credit, it’s an outlier but for Brittney it’s the rule ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️
 

so to answer op’s question, GP thought the producers and songwriters did a good job and that’s why it outstreams everything else on Britney’s album. It is an outlier on the album that could have been sung by any generic auto tuned blond popstar 

19 minutes ago, Jay07 said:

No it's just that Toxic is bigger than your faves entire career 

 

 

 

His fave is Britney though 

3 minutes ago, brazil said:

Also, Toxic isn't responsible for 90% of ITZ's streams. Toxic has approx. 757M streams, Everytime alone has 107M. I know as an Xtina stan you're not good in math, but that means that even if ITZ only had Toxic and Everytime in it, Toxic would still only compromise approx. 86% of the album's streams

Oh my only a 4% difference. Its basically almost 90%. 

I would say this, the britney stans better hope a song from stripped doesnt go viral on tiktok because the difference between stripped and in the zone are only about 250 million streams. 

 

 

 

 

3 minutes ago, BionicWooHoo said:

Except it’s Christina’s voice that earned the song a Grammy. And Christina also has signature song Dirrty where she has songwriting and producing credits AND despite being slutshamed in America was a smash in Europe and still earned a Grammy nom. 

 

when Christina doesn’t have a song writing or producing credit, it’s an outlier but for Brittney it’s the rule ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️
 

so to answer op’s question, GP thought the producers and songwriters did a good job and that’s why it outstreams everything else on Britney’s album. It is an outlier on the album that could have been sung by any generic auto tuned blond popstar 

She also has writing credits for Feel this moment which is about to cross 400 million streams. 

7 minutes ago, scenekiller said:

Britney makes more money not lifting a pen than any royalties Xtina sees from writing her songs

Good thing I stan for and value artistic integrity most then!! I’m simply giving credit where credit is due. Not Britney stans acting like Britney deserves all the credit for Toxic when all she did was pay people to be creative for her ?

1 minute ago, BionicWooHoo said:

Good thing I stan for and value artistic integrity most then!! I’m simply giving credit where credit is due. Not Britney stans acting like Britney deserves all the credit for Toxic when all she did was pay people to be creative for her ?

Good thing nobody cares sis give it a rest and leave already

It’s coming for 1B streams any day now and that’s more than any of Xtina’s albums can say

 

3 minutes ago, Distantconstellation said:

Oh my only a 4% difference. Its basically almost 90%. 

I would say this, the britney stans better hope a song from stripped doesnt go viral on tiktok because the difference between stripped and in the zone are only about 250 million streams. 

 

 

 

 

Yea I wonder how many of many of that 86% streams came from the toxic pony remix that Britney stans love to brag about… that once again ms spears had zero creative input into ? so that also answers OPs question tbh

14 minutes ago, lovemehateme said:

Help the good sis out and stream this underrated BOP 

 

 

NO stream this underrated BOP 

 

4 minutes ago, BionicWooHoo said:

Good thing I stan for and value artistic integrity most then!! I’m simply giving credit where credit is due. Not Britney stans acting like Britney deserves all the credit for Toxic when all she did was pay people to be creative for her ?

Too bad no one cares

Are we really at a point where we’re arguing about writers/producers? Give it up. It’s so embarrassing. 

Yeah the streams are horrid lol

25 minutes ago, luckythisway said:

Nurse they broke out again 

 

Schrihming

 

6 minutes ago, Distantconstellation said:

Oh my only a 4% difference. Its basically almost 90%. 

I would say this, the britney stans better hope a song from stripped doesnt go viral on tiktok because the difference between stripped and in the zone are only about 250 million streams. 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, considering two songs. Toxic streams are actually closer to 75% of ITZ's. And so what? That just meams the song is huge and a song needs to be remembered to go viral. BOMT and Oops never went viral and their spotify streams still stomp on any Xtina song. And we're not even talking about youtube, where even Sometimes outstreams any Stripped single 

8 minutes ago, Distantconstellation said:

Oh my only a 4% difference. Its basically almost 90%. 

I would say this, the britney stans better hope a song from stripped doesnt go viral on tiktok because the difference between stripped and in the zone are only about 250 million streams. 

 

 

 

 

“Only about 250m” That’s more than some Aguilera entire albums 

D.M.F and her visceral trolling of Christina Aguilera is how old now? Pretty sure this member has been on here for well over a decade at this point

6 minutes ago, BionicWooHoo said:

Yea I wonder how many of many of that 86% streams came from the toxic pony remix

Zero. The remix and original are not merged 

2 minutes ago, scenekiller said:

Good thing nobody cares sis give it a rest and leave already

Good thing I don’t post looking for your or any Britney stan’s approval. All I’m doing is answering Op’s question: 86% of the streams are bc Bloodshy and Avant did an amazing job producing a track that could be sung by any generic auto tuned blond popstar

6 minutes ago, James_Dean said:

Too bad no one cares

It’s cute that me saying I value giving credit where it’s due and artistic integrity triggers enough Britney stans that I have multiple quoting me. My impact tbh