Need more pictures 

I had a feeling she would go to the Super Bowl

 

Edited February 12, 20242 yr by Miichael

um anyway

 

The heels and the leather 🖤

 

A Gaga-esque Super Bowl look

2 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she cahnged BTW lyrics during a recent performance.

 

The answer: there's just no contesting.

 

An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them.

 

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there.

 

What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's.  It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness.

 

All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica?

 

Not Taylor Swift when she's the most bland and uninteresting "singer" out there 

2 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance.

 

The answer: there's just no contesting.

 

An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them.

 

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there.

 

What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's.  It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness.

 

All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica?

this bible? bye 

 

2 hours ago, ToniGaga96 said:

 

 

 

 

 

She changed the lyrics from "king of the hill" to "queen of the hell" 👹

Oh I hear queen of the hell very clearly

She doesnt change lyrics of New York New York often, does she?

What if LG7 is hell themed we was like aaaa

6 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance.

 

The answer: there's just no contesting.

 

An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them.

 

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there.

 

What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's.  It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness.

 

All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica?

Gurl stfu 

Swifties are do delusional and insufferable

6 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance.

 

The answer: there's just no contesting.

 

An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them.

 

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there.

 

What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's.  It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness.

 

All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica?

Spelling is fun!

"Taylor Swift is more provocative" 

Quote

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks

is sending me 

8 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance.

 

The answer: there's just no contesting.

 

An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them.

 

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there.

 

What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's.  It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness.

 

All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself as a whole. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica?

I stopped reading at “Taylor Swift is more provocative”

7 minutes ago, AllyGayTor said:

Need more pictures 

luckily the papz got to her this time unlike Vegas, so we should get some good ones 

1 minute ago, sunbathinganimal said:

is sending me 

Swifties live in a cult-like alternate reality eco-chamber where they convince themselves everytime Taylor farts it's the second coming of christ

The white barbz

Edited February 12, 20242 yr by SweetOreosOfHeaven

Imagen calling Taylor lyrics as special and ground breaking! 

anyway where is mommy @JapaneseMommy

3 minutes ago, Summer Boy said:

 

Not Taylor Swift when she's the most bland and uninteresting "singer" out there 

She gives something to people talk about and what about Gaga? Besides her acting career, does anyone remember that she is singing about anything?

I'm a huge Gaga fan, but her recent work is boring me too much.

12 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics

Edited February 12, 20242 yr by nadiamendell

Just now, Foreigner said:

She gives something to people talk about and what about Gaga? Besides her acting career, does anyone remember that she is singing about anything?

I'm a huge Gaga fan, but her recent work is boring me too much.

 

she and Bradley should take a pic with their Shallow Diamond plaque 

1 minute ago, Happylittlepunk said:

Imagen calling Taylor lyrics as special and ground breaking! 

It's not the point. The ideia is that Taylor isn't groundbreaking with her performances, but she sells her work with her lyrics which gives people something to talk about.

14 minutes ago, Foreigner said:

 

Taylor Swift is more provocative