mike_int

We are talking about the WEDDING not concert I told you before, stop twisting words and facts so it somehow fits your false narrative where 99% people would disagree with you Anyway, that was enough time to chat with mentally challenged, I have massage appointment now Have a nice day :)

So first, with your "Okay" you basically proved my point and agreed with me Second, this thread was created 8 hours ago, you wont tell anybody who and when and where can react and post. Im not obsessive about their wedding but simply playing around with TS fanatics who are saying their wedding was "intimate"

Oh so now you are using definition as a point but definition of "intimate" based human sociology and fundamental nature of emotional closeness was not right because it didnt work with your false narrative You gotta love how TS fanatics fight so hard for their favorite narcissists with victim syndrome,

Because "intimate" is different than "private" 1000+ guests wedding is not intimate Also how do u want paparazzi to get inside MSG? You get paparazzi photos from outside the venue obviously

TS fanatic talking about objective truth is even better when you called Travis and Taylor aristocrats

So basically if Travis (who you wouldn't give a flying f*ck if he didnt marry Taylor) says the world is flat you would find a way to somehow rationalize it and say it is LOL

We are talking about wedding, not concert, again you are twisting words left right trying to prove a point which you dont have. As I said before, you TS fanatcs are fun to argue sometimes but again, its like talking to a wall at the end Bye ;)

Private or closed based on the venue, secret if not publicly announced but not "intimate" no I dont really use AI but:

Yes and I agreed I dont have the net-worth like them but I also said I could afford to have celebration or wedding with couple hundreds guests. Im not insecure and I dont need to defend myself, I simply corrected you. This is discussion about whether 1000+ guests wedding can be considered "intimate" And here you are throwing things right left just to come to the point that you dont actually have a point ;) it is actually fun to argue with TS fanatics sometimes but then you realize its like talking to a wall and then it gets boring

Again, READ ... Travis Kelce on why he and Taylor Swift decided to get married at Madison Square Garden: "We wanted it to do it somewhere where we could have intimate and genuine setting without a lot of distractions and we needed to have a private feel, and MSG went above and beyond to give us

Oh lord, you TS fanatics really needs to start read and read with understanding and dont twists people words. You started talking about money and I corrected you, cause you were projecting your lack of financials on me which is equally inaccurate as saying 1000 guest wedding can be considered "INTIMATE" I understand you would find a way to rationalize to even buy a vinyl with Taylor´s fart on it but it doesnt mean you are right Also, did you just called Travis and Taylor "aristocrats" ?

Again, I do have financials to easily host wedding or any type of celebration for couple hundreds of people if I wanted., you might not, but again, dont compare yourself to me ;) I wouldn't tho because I prefer actual real "intimate" gatherings Again, 1000 guests is not "intimate" in any way shape or form, no matter how rich or famous you are If he said they wanted private, closed venue due to security etc, OK but dont use word "intimate" when you had 1000+ guests, because it is not

1000 guests is not "intimate" no matter how you are trying to rationalize it And dont project your reality on me cause I have worked and know hundreds of people as well from different countries and continents and various fields of professional interests and background and of course I dont have net-worth as Taylor but I could easily afford wedding for couple hundred people.

Everytime I see written only "Travis & Taylor" it reminds of "Beavis & Butthead"

Didnt she invite like 1000 guests? How is THAT intimate?

I think we are getting first single end of September/early October , second single February (plus possible Grammy performance if her contract with Coachella allows it) and album first week of April (with possible Coachella headlining weekends)

We got Superbloom by Jessie Ware and CII by Madonna so Im kinda OK

I told you she is releasing album Q1 2027 and headlining Coachella

as per my post before, Madonna never released proper "rock" song however took inspiration from different subgenres of rock (ambient rock, psychedelic 60s rock, grunge and alternative rock) "Cowboy Style" by Kylie is more folktronica mixed with celtic pop

In what universe was "Impossible Princess" rock album Also, are you familiar with the masterpiece named Ray Of Light

Not pure "rock" per se, but she took inspiration from different subgenres: punk and garage Dance synth rock Grunge / alternative rock Acoustic indie rock Ambient rock Psychedelic 60s rock

She didn't release an album for a decade, where did you get that she is even remotely tries to get on the top of charts?

Drowned World/Substitute for Love is probably my most played Madonna song and absolute masterpiece so my vote is for that