vadge

Confessions II is the most successful album/era by a woman in her 60s in the history of music...

I Feel So Free Future Lovers One Step Away Bring Your Love Hot Sauce Everything Sorry Love Sensation Get Together Jump School Fragile Betrayal Let It Will Be How High L.E.S. Girl

Meanwhile the Confessions II era is unprecedented territory and already the most successful, relevant and acclaimed era from a woman over 60 in music history. Madonna has more streams than every female artist pre-1990. Lady Gaga has more streams than Karol G. 1980s Madonna - 12b Whitney Houston - 8b Céline Dion - 7.5b Enya - 5.3b Kylie Minogue - 4.2b 2000s Taylor Swift - 128b Rihanna - 61b Nicki Minaj - 43b Lana Del Rey - 42b Lady Gaga - 37.8b (and 2k away from surpassed by Karol G)

So correct it! Update it!

So no rebuttal, okay

So update it.

As far as I'm aware Roisin was cancelled just by her comments on puberty blockers. I haven't kept up with what she has said since. Gender nonconforming children (effeminate boys, masculine girls) are disproportionately "ideal candidates" for puberty blockers. Children who are gender nonconforming are roughly 20 times more likely to grow up to be homosexual. A 1998 case study following 111 children given puberty blockers at age 13. Of the 70 patients who became 'ready' to take cross-sex hormones, 69 were homosexual or bisexual and only 1 patient was heterosexual. Scientists followed 139 gender dysphoric boys from 1989-2002 and found that 88% of boys outgrow gender dysphoria by age 20 when left alone. Of those boys, 63.6% turned out to be same-sex attracted. 80-90% of Tavistock patients were same sex attracted. Studies show children who grow up to be LGB were 98% more likely to follow onto cross sex hormones after being given puberty blockers. The sequence of puberty blockers > cross sex hormones results in sterility 100% of the time, as well as underdeveloped genitals and sexual function. Essentially homosexual people are disproportionately "eligible" for a process that results in sterility, genital disfigurement and absence/loss of sexual function. If it was a different group pushing this (say, conservatives) it would be considered a homosexual genocide and every commenter in this thread would be taking the exact opposite stance. Homophobic belief systems/practices will always be on the wrong side of history.

Either pop or country-pop, like all her other albums

This thread will be very interesting to look back on in 10 years or so

Because Madonna has a passion for (and authentic connection to) house music whereas the other song is a caricature created for the sole purpose of pandering to a cynical (homophobic) idea of what house music is. Really it's an insult to LMs music taste, and the fact they're defending the song with their lives makes it all the more embarrassing and sad.

I would listen if it was original material and modernising the genre, presented as an actual era. But basic covers of ancient standards with their original arrangements doesn't interest me in the slightest. It kinda feels like Trisha Paytas cosplay where her audience just accepts that she will keep doing it because she loves it, but no one asked for it or would care if she stopped.

Madonna referencing her own 90s music = Rain on Me?

Very true But comparing the discographies of 80s-90s artists (Madonna, Janet, Kylie, Mariah, Beyonce, Britney) to the best of the 00s-10s (Taylor Swift, Ariana Grande, Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus) there is a clear winner. And 2020s is just horrendous.

The downgrade with each decade