-
Weirdest Narratives Pushed On ATRL?
Taylor Swift is rivaling the Beatles even though her latest album is #1 in 14 countries while Lady Gaga's Chromatica went #1 in 19 countries
-
Lady Gaga
So Taylor's 1989TV album debuts at #1 in 14 countries while Lady Gaga's Chromatica debuted at #1 in 19 countries. Call it a fun-fact, a side-note, an inspiration for a thread
-
Lady Gaga
- What should Adele do to sell 1M first week again?
The shoe always fits that certain artist and her stans I think if Adele got the special editions and variants thing on her next album then she could do big numbers again. It's funny because if that certain artist with those stans did NOT do special editions and variants and only released one version her album would do 30 numbers potentially- Republic: 1989 TV debuts with 3.5M globally
I mean did you just see how they're starting to deflect? These are literal facts that 1989TV is #1 in less places than Lady Gaga's Chromatica album and they want to make it about who stans what instead of providing an actual counter-argument to what tf is happening to her supposed peak if she's not even able to out chart what many consider Gaga's flop album WW. And on top of that, Taylor has ZERO #1 singles in most countries outside of the US and here they are claiming she's the new MJ- Republic: 1989 TV debuts with 3.5M globally
Flopmatica was #1 in more countries than 1989TV- Republic: 1989 TV debuts with 3.5M globally
Instead of defecting, please explain how Taylor's massive peak manages to debut at #1 in less countries than Gaga's Chromatica album- Forget Madonna & The Beatles, has Taylor surpassed Ed Sheeran?
I agree about most of what you wrote but the last part about Janet Jackson. Janet is extremely impactful and even though she wasn't bigger than her peers (Madonna, Whitney, Mariah, Celine) in most countries outside of the US doesn't change that she was and is an absolute icon. That said, the only reason these "Swift is not as big here and there" statements are made (and you seem to agree) is that the Swifties are claiming she's rivaling the Beatles and bigger than Madonna or the new MJ and all that which is what causes these counter-arguments. If the Swifties just took it down a notch and admitted "yes, she's super massive, could outsell Madonna in the US but she's not as big in Europe, Asia and Latin America so she's obviously not the new MJ on a global scale" then those remarks and posts and threads that counter-argument this wouldn't be made.- Republic: 1989 TV debuts with 3.5M globally
I mean... I'm kinda going to repost this news but can somehow tell me how Lady Gaga's ******* Chromatica album went #1 in 19 countries in its debut week but bigger-than-The-Beatles Taylor went #1 in 14 countries. I'm cackling- Republic: 1989 TV debuts with 3.5M globally
Adele's 21: #1 in 29 countries Lady Gaga's Chromatica: #1 in 19 countries Taylor Swift's 1989TV: #1 in 14 countries Yet SHE'S BIGGER THAN THE BEATLES111!!!- Forget Madonna & The Beatles, has Taylor surpassed Ed Sheeran?
At this point seeing that they make a thread about Taylor's OWN LABEL proclaiming she somehow sold 3.5 million units around the world with no official stats to back it up and they just celebrate makes me think that if her label proclaimed her to have gone #1 on another planet in another galaxy they'd wholeheartedly start believing that- Forget Madonna & The Beatles, has Taylor surpassed Ed Sheeran?
Now the Swifties can whine and cry about it all they want but it's facts with evidence and STATS from official charts to back up all the claims that Taylor isn't on Ed Sheeran's level of hits outside of Anglosphere and she's not even on par with Adele in terms of album sales and HITS in the same territories. All they care about is that she's massive in the US and Australia Like, do they do their proper research? Sidenote: Ed Sheeran is also right behind Michael Jackson in Germany in overall sales and Taylor is N/A on the all-time list there as well And Lady Gaga and Rihanna are on the all-time list too but who cares about Germany, Turkey, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Mexico, Nigeria, Brazil, Greece and Japan when she's massive in the US- Is it time to admit that Ed Sheeran is bigger than The Beatles in the UK?
It's funny how when you use reverse psychology on the Swifties they start to use excuses like "bUT it'S juST SINglEs11!!" Anyway, Ed Sheeran has multiple #1 singles outside of Anglosphere. Call me when Taylor has that- Is it time to admit that Ed Sheeran is bigger than The Beatles in the UK?
And the Beatles came out at a time when singles were the main consumption and not albums- Is it time to admit that Ed Sheeran is bigger than The Beatles in the UK?
More like you guys are annoyed and whining for absolutely losing every discussion - What should Adele do to sell 1M first week again?
JaXXXon
Banned
-
Joined
-
Last visited