TheOrangeTree Posted October 3 Posted October 3 I've just come out of the cinema, I liked it personally and I think the reviews are excessive. My only negative points would be: Spoiler a trailer that shows absolutely everything (INCLUDING the only action scene in the film) and a few too many songs that give a bit of a filler image. The cover of 'Ne me quitte pas' is without doubt the most beautiful part of the film. 3
Arthoe Posted October 3 Posted October 3 Spoiler Honestly I never even planned to watch JFAD, just liked I did with HOG because I f*cking hate watching movies, especially if they're not well-rounded, actually good pieces of work. I love Gaga's acting gigs and she's an incredible actress, but even watching movies I LOVE feels like a tedious chore for me. I'd rather clean my entire bathroom with a toothbrush and finish my f*cking public law diploma thesis than put on a movie. 2
sunbathinganimal Posted October 3 Posted October 3 granted I've not seen it yet but I feel like making the sequel to a billion-grossing comic book movie a musical is inherently risky or stupid 1
GipJo Posted October 3 Posted October 3 4 minutes ago, Almodusa said: The production in HM isn't even that prominent. You can't tell it's BloodPop anyway. The production is mostly Rice, they credited him because he worked on the demo before they took it and finished it. I don't know why some of you still **** on bloodpop over and over again.
opbranden Posted October 3 Posted October 3 1 minute ago, Jack! said: I don't like it very much, and I definitely couldn't watch it again. But that movie was the definition of risky and was trying at least. In FaD I just don't see it...
Velvet Posted October 3 Posted October 3 6 minutes ago, Arthoe said: Reveal hidden contents Honestly I never even planned to watch JFAD, just liked I did with HOG because I f*cking hate watching movies, especially if they're not well-rounded, actually good pieces of work. I love Gaga's acting gigs and she's an incredible actress, but even watching movies I LOVE feels like a tedious chore for me. I'd rather clean my entire bathroom with a toothbrush and finish my f*cking public law diploma thesis than put on a movie. Spoiler Well you better still buy a ticket We can't have a flop movie and album at the same time 1
Sannie Posted October 3 Posted October 3 5 minutes ago, GipJo said: The production is mostly Rice, they credited him because he worked on the demo before they took it and finished it. I don't know why some of you still **** on bloodpop over and over again. Dddd they just see his name and immediately melt down. 1
opbranden Posted October 3 Posted October 3 1 minute ago, sunbathinganimal said: granted I've not seen it yet but I feel like making the sequel to a billion-grossing comic book movie a musical is inherently risky or stupid I think it's more stupid than risky, especially since they kept insisting it wasn't truly a musical. And in a way they're correct; while it draws a lot from the musical genre, it never fully embraces it. There was so much potential for creative and wild ideas, but they didn't take advantage of it. Oh well, I suppose enjoy your 48% Todd Syphillis 1
Artur Posted October 3 Posted October 3 (edited) AM US Albums #17. Harlequin (+1) Edited October 3 by Artur 5
GipJo Posted October 3 Posted October 3 2 minutes ago, opbranden said: I don't like it very much, and I definitely couldn't watch it again. But that movie was the definition of risky and was trying at least. In FaD I just don't see it... It's easy to risk it with original passion project and no big budget tied to it. Artsy films being risky is quite normal. A CBM being a musical and with no big action pieces? Yes that's like the most risky thing to do with such type of movies.
Arthoe Posted October 3 Posted October 3 Just now, Velvet said: Hide contents Well you better still buy a ticket We can't have a flop movie and album at the same time Spoiler I will be doing neither because buying both is absolutely not feasible with the amount of inflation and price gouging the entertainment corporations are doing in my country. I'd rather buy groceries for three weeks and like... try to survive.
Badgalbriel Posted October 3 Posted October 3 13 minutes ago, cloudbusting said: speaking as someone who hasn't seen it, I think there was an inherent risk with the musical factor. doesn't mean it paid off, but still The problem is that it was not risky, just a dumb decision. The music scenes add nothing to the movie. It feels like it was just there to make the movie longer. 1
Jack! Posted October 3 Posted October 3 (edited) 19 minutes ago, opbranden said: I don't like it very much, and I definitely couldn't watch it again. But that movie was the definition of risky and was trying at least. In FaD I just don't see it... I honestly just can't stand that movie. There were important messages tethered in the story but the way it's played out just doesn't allow any of them to be impactful. It's always played to me as the mind child of a college dorm room after one too many doobies. I think to correlate what you're saying it's a true excuse of trying too hard. At least in my opinion anyway. Edited October 3 by Jack!
PMM Posted October 3 Posted October 3 13 minutes ago, Bhabylon said: Those of you who aren't watching Joker 2 in theaters should use your coins to buy 20-30 copies of the LG7 lead when it comes out or else you will risk getting your monster card revoked btw you know what we should do? we should check everyone with their receipt (pic with at least 5 albums with username) then you can get into this base. if not. ban till Lg8 1
Album Leak Posted October 3 Posted October 3 ARTPOP (the song) is kinda hitting HARD today, holy It'd probably be one of my favorites from her if it weren't for those '' HEEE HEE '' vocals in the second verse.
Abracadabra Posted October 3 Posted October 3 Happy Mistake performance on Kimmel is so addictive, legit one of her best TV performances ever. Also it's sending me that Brian Newman is standing there with his trumpet like "Now why am I in it?" 3
Badgalbriel Posted October 3 Posted October 3 14 minutes ago, sunbathinganimal said: granted I've not seen it yet but I feel like making the sequel to a billion-grossing comic book movie a musical is inherently risky or stupid It's not risky. It was indeed stupid. Even though I enjoyed the movie, the musical scenes brought nothing to the plot.
ViviLittleM Posted October 3 Posted October 3 1 hour ago, Arthoe said: Nope, Billboard made rules against last minute signed copies The only count as sales the week they actually get shipped and arrive to the customer now. 1 hour ago, truthteller said: can she just drop 8k of signed copies on her website to push it to #10 like it's really just that close Even if she dropped those, US fans wouldn't even buy… 1
HausOfPunk Posted October 3 Posted October 3 For anyone who watched JFAD already (and without any spoilers please...), would I generally find the movie entertaining as a Gaga stan who doesn't care at all about the first movie and the Joker/DC Universe? Does it work as a standalone film?
Abracadabra Posted October 3 Posted October 3 Mother! was a great movie and ooou the way Gar would have ate that role up
opbranden Posted October 3 Posted October 3 3 minutes ago, Jack! said: I honestly just can't stand that movie. There were important messaged tethered in the story but the way it's played out just doesn't allow any of them to be impactful. It's always played to me as the mind child of a college dorm room after one too many doobies. I think to correlate what you're saying it's a true excuse of trying too hard. At least in my opinion anyway. I respect your opinion and I don't completely disagree. I was just trying to make an example of a risky movie
Recommended Posts