Megan Pete

CNN statement: He thought he was on Twitter

it's a theatre show. taylor and beyonce have skewered people's views of concerts. girlies can give great theatre shows with just a mic, a band and some dancers.

No

I don't know how people are even arguing with this, it's simple logic. Even in 1500, before the transatlantic slave trade, all places below Northern Africa had farrr less developed infrastructure and agricultural systems. I mean Africa's population was 46mil while Europe, despite being vastly smaller was nearing 70mil. Ofc since industrialization, topography has come to play a much smaller role and colonialism (and to a smaller extent the slave trade) are why African nations haven't been able to catch up, but OPs question was about Africa's 'headstart' compared to Asia and Europe. The answer obviously has nothing to do with events which began thousands of years after European and Asian kingdoms/nations had established themselves

I think we can both agree that either way both of you fan bases are embarrassing for holding on to a 10 year grudge

What are these options. There's a big difference between 4, 3 and 2mil. She's probably gonna do around 2.5-3mil

This Trump and Biden are the same rhetoric is so false. Yes, a complete arms embargo would be the most morally right decision, but that's not happening under any president and it benefits no one to be set on that point while ignoring actually realistic options. The Biden administration has been seriously working on a ceasefire deal (and this is documented by literally every news source, even ones that are vehemently anti us). Their May 31st deal proposal was literally initially accepted by both Israel and most factions in Palestine, but then fell through due to multiple obstacles and sabotages, including Trump literally telling Netanyahu to not agree to a deal, in order damage Harris' campaign, under promise of supplying even more weapons. So no, Biden/Harris and Trump are not the same. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2024/9/2/biden-says-netanyahu-not-doing-enough-to-secure-gaza-ceasefire-deal https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cew1jkgd7n8o.amp https://amp.scmp.com/news/world/middle-east/article/3279216/us-believes-gaza-ceasefire-deal-unlikely-bidens-term-report-says

If you listen she says "You yelled at me at a Grammy Party." The Grammys were in February. Ofc she can defend herself but if she's still losing sleep over rude photographers from 8 months ago then she'll have a tough time being a celebrity

Honestly, I don't think so. Harris campaign from a political standpoint was actually pretty great. Yeah she has some embarrassing blunders (like the gender affirming care question this week), but those are really inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. She and her team had a very difficult job, replacing Joe who had terrible approval ratings and only having like 4 months to win over the public and it is an insane feat that they even achieved that. The only real issue with her stance is ofc Palestine, but that is an untenable position for any democratic candidate. No politician outright condemning and disparaging Israel would ever get donors behind them, let alone win the nomination, and yet many of their voters are strongly pro-Palestine (unlike Republicans who dgaf).

You are ridiculous and your stance is not achieving anything. You people act like US foreign policy is based on Harris or Biden or Trump's personal opinions. The US makes dozens of billions because of their relationship with Israel + the big role Israel plays in the American IT & pharma industries. But more importantly, Israel is essential to US intelligence concerning the Middle East and now (more importantly than ever) Russia. So you can write aggressive paragraphs and rant about Harris all you want, you can get everyone you know to vote Jill Stein, the US will never stop supporting Israel as long as it is profitable for them. Unless you are planning on starting a revolution to take down the US government (in which case, power to you), a unilateral ceasefire is the only realistic option. The chances of this happening under a democratic presidency and congress are certainly higher than under MAGA, and no serious person can argue against that. While a unilateral ceasefire is obviously insufficient and inhumane, when hundreds of people are dying every day, an 'all or nothing' stance is 100% the morally wrong position. No sane person on this site supports the mass murder of dozens of thousands of innocent civilians, and people are allowed to also be concerned with domestic issues which affect them directly. Choosing to vote Harris, isn't choosing to prioritize domestic issues over America's support of Israel, because no citizen has the power to change that, regardless of who they vote. But it is peak political illiteracy to think that America's support of Israel under Trump and under Harris will look the same.

So you can't answer my question?

And what does not voting change about this situation?

5

?? Adele literally has never hopped on anyone else's song and the only proper feature she's had was Chris Stapleton on a target only remix. Taylor is also very selective and only collaborates with her friends. She obviously wouldn't collab with Rihanna just because she's Rihanna