Miss Bank$

The way Camila's fans are instantly HUMBLED. We love to see it. I bet Camila is nervous rn for the future at her label

Cause her fans are insufferable and no one likes how cringey she is. She's so cringey,

Albanian RIhanna

oop

it's above me now

https://thatgrapejuice.net/2019/10/lil-kims-nine-projected-sell-under-1000-units-its-opening-week/

Whatever the record, Fancy is an awful song.

bit of a reach. I could name more liked and bigger artists

Actually I have, you just entirely misread my post. You realise Trump supports are just anyone who voted for him - they don't need to be full fledged confederates. The book you cited doesn't even have empirical evidence to support the theory. And back to the point of non voters, my point still stands - The democratic nominee needs to have the appeal for not just switching conservative voters but attracting people who do not vote. Bernie would not win a presidency when he cannot even attract the Black vote. His base is tight and strong but not growing

I agree, the terms wont mean much to someone who doesn't really understand the difference in those terms (the majority of the US lol)

To be honest, retaining a free market can still be a good thing. Free markets and capitalism aren't inherently bad just as long as they're well regulated and don't rely on 'trickle down' economics. Usually the short coming of a free market is that wealth never ends up being distributed correctly. My country (NZ) operated under both socialism AND capitalism and both and pros and cons, but the biggest con in the 80s when we switched to free market based systems was that wealth NEVER trickled down and rich people are usually useless at distributing that wealth correctly; causing a huge wealth gap.

IMO the female candidates are the BEST talkers. I think that gives Tulsi/Warren/Williamson/Harris a huge edge in attracting voters over the male candidates that just don't have any charisma.

I think it's important with the rise of corporatism though. The left doesn't necessarily mean progressive anymore. Which is why I think the labels are important because people have this assumption that 'Left' or 'Liberal' is synonymous with someone that holds progressive values. It kinda amazes me how much money and economic power plays into US politics, I see nothing like this in my country. Whereas someone like Elizabeth Warren is a little bit Pro-Establisment because of her acceptance of corporate donors.

But they are anti-establisment, Tulsi's record has proven that she's gone against the grain and even stepped down for it. i'm not saying every policy they have is completely leftist but they are definitely the most progressive in policies (overall)

Sis, there's a reason several candidates have literally MOVED to Iowa... They need to win the swing states which are usually right leaning, which is how Trump won

I find it funny because the most leftist/least capitalist in policy candidates on that stage are Tulsi, Yang, and Williamson. Look at how Warren's campaign is being funded and it's through huge corporate donations

Well you need to attract conservative voters... If you don't win in those conservative states then you're not becoming president sweetie.

Small correction, Warren is a left-centrist.

The big failing with Bernie bros and democrats is that they don't understand that their candidate needs cross over appeal to win VOTES. Like you said, he is not showing any growth. He just has a big fan base, Bernie does not appeal to a broad range of people AND if he were to win the democratic nomination, he would definitely lose verse Trump. IMO the only candidates that have shown the strongest performances in speaking and could draw in many republican voters because they have conservative values about them are Tulsi (War background that could appeal to Trump voters) Warren (Is centrist enough that she isn't polarizing, like an improved Hillary) Williamson (potential to pick up the Black vote now that Kamala is falling, Also could appeal to a large number of Evangelicals with her spiritual background with God etc.) (Trump has a HIGH evangelical voter base, a candidate running with those values could really appeal to conservatives)

@jpow fix ur OP it's missing Marianne Williamson

Except Tulsi didn't actively work AGAINST lgbt. Kamala was a whole prosecutor and lawmaker that campaigned to PUNISH people

Well she's a cop supporter and a former prosecutor soo

Honestly I love her but Tulsi would draw more votes than her. She's too progressive to turn Trump voters

Ew why would anyone support Kamala, her track record is horrendous #Tulsi2020

and #158 on the Worldwide iTunes Album chart