Miss Bank$

The way Camila's fans are instantly HUMBLED. We love to see it. I bet Camila is nervous rn for the future at her label

Cause her fans are insufferable and no one likes how cringey she is. She's so cringey,

Albanian RIhanna

oop

it's above me now

https://thatgrapejuice.net/2019/10/lil-kims-nine-projected-sell-under-1000-units-its-opening-week/

Whatever the record, Fancy is an awful song.

bit of a reach. I could name more liked and bigger artists

Actually I have, you just entirely misread my post. You realise Trump supports are just anyone who voted for him - they don't need to be full fledged confederates. The book you cited doesn't even have empirical evidence to support the theory. And back to the point of non voters, my point still stands - The democratic nominee needs to have the appeal for not just switching conservative voters but attracting people who do not vote. Bernie would not win a presidency when he cannot even attract the Black vote. His base is tight and strong but not growing

I agree, the terms wont mean much to someone who doesn't really understand the difference in those terms (the majority of the US lol)

To be honest, retaining a free market can still be a good thing. Free markets and capitalism aren't inherently bad just as long as they're well regulated and don't rely on 'trickle down' economics. Usually the short coming of a free market is that wealth never ends up being distributed correctly. My country (NZ) operated under both socialism AND capitalism and both and pros and cons, but the biggest con in the 80s when we switched to free market based systems was that wealth NEVER trickled down and rich people are usually useless at distributing that wealth correctly; causing a huge wealth gap.

IMO the female candidates are the BEST talkers. I think that gives Tulsi/Warren/Williamson/Harris a huge edge in attracting voters over the male candidates that just don't have any charisma.

I think it's important with the rise of corporatism though. The left doesn't necessarily mean progressive anymore. Which is why I think the labels are important because people have this assumption that 'Left' or 'Liberal' is synonymous with someone that holds progressive values. It kinda amazes me how much money and economic power plays into US politics, I see nothing like this in my country. Whereas someone like Elizabeth Warren is a little bit Pro-Establisment because of her acceptance of corporate donors.

But they are anti-establisment, Tulsi's record has proven that she's gone against the grain and even stepped down for it. i'm not saying every policy they have is completely leftist but they are definitely the most progressive in policies (overall)

Sis, there's a reason several candidates have literally MOVED to Iowa... They need to win the swing states which are usually right leaning, which is how Trump won