JoshBTW

1) Even if it were true that the rioters weren’t targeting any group in particular, and I’ve seen no proof of these riots damaging the property of people from their own community from a quick search (but never mind that since I can’t really prove it), a riot in Texas over burned bibles that also damaged white Christian people’s property would still rightfully be labeled as an incredibly extremist act (even if not an act of white supremacism) and so would anyone commenting what that user commented originally. 2) Huh? Who was discussing the idiot that burned the Quran? Or American atheists/Swedish secularists and their reactions? You on something? Your straw-manning isn’t amusing.

Do you ever get tired of framing your own opinions and biases to inaccurately describe someone’s line of thought? I stopped reading at the ridiculous comparison with Christian missionaries in Africa. Keep rambling on, per usual.

Should I quote CCP approved propaganda? I’m sure you’d find that more reliable. The CCP doesn’t need to be vilified I’ll leave that to crazies like trump, the facts speak for themselves. Speak for yourself about advocating for humanitarian causes, cause you don’t know me or probably anyone in this forum personally to speak of that.

Hmm at the time of their release I’d say reputation. But tbh nowadays it seems like anti is bigger

Do you believe not discussing this issue and not talking about the protests of people in Shanghai serves their interests better? Please enlighten us as to what we should be doing, Domination.

Thread title: unrest in Texas over bible burnings The news: white Christian Texans burn cars of the people belonging to the religious/ethnic group the people that burned the Bibles belong to and riot over said extremist group planning to do it again. The comment: They choose the holy date of Christmas to provoke Christians… …They still expect no retaliation or a fight back. If anyone called the hypothetical commenter in this scenario a white supremacist enabler I wouldn’t necessarily disagree. Would you? Draw your own conclusions as to what that says about your original comment.

Can we not pretend like rioting and burning vehicles is a legitimate response to what was done? If anything it’s counterproductive. Both cases of the two sides of the same extremist coin.

From what I can gather there’s no change in the extreme policies even after the disturbing news about an exhausted official allegedly committing suicide: How long can they keep 26 million people in these conditions until they revolt?

Not during Ramadan I don’t understand what they hope to achieve. They claim to want immigrants to integrate but then do things like this that will only further isolate them. On second thought though, people doing this probably don’t want them to integrate at all and just be deported at best.

I feel like most straight men are a bit out of touch with their sensitive side because that’s what society expects of them. The percentage of gay men in touch with their sensitive side is arguably a lot higher, so it only makes sense they’ll excel in creative fields which require empathy and being in touch with your feelings - as opposed to being afraid of them.

Not the second reply

He should fall on his knees repenting for being a bigot.

I can’t speak about things that aren’t reported, even if they might happen. Does beg the question, why is this particular series of events and protests leaking then? Something can be said about the scope and size of the unrest in Shanghai if it’s escaping CCP control unlike other alleged protests.

They were being sarcastic

I get what you’re saying, but there would be a big difference between people protesting local policies and people outright blaming and protesting the CCP itself. Even if in practice they’re part of the same entity. You can bet everyone in the CCP is watching this unfold carefully since it could easily spill over.