Timber Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 5 minutes ago, iHype. said: She might surpass 1.3m with Billboard. They weigh some physical stores with 1 purchase counting as multiple, while BuzzAngle/HDD does not. Wait, why do they count 1 purchase as multiple for some stores. I'm confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Honeymoon Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 (edited) Does anyone know if the 1.29m figure is pure sales or SPS? Edited November 17, 2017 by Blue Honeymoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHype. Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 Just now, Timber said: Wait, why do they count 1 purchase as multiple for some stores. I'm confusion. Some stores in an area might not report to Nielsen, so they could, for example, count every purchase as 2 copies in a store in that area to make up for not having any data for another store. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timber Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, iHype. said: Some stores in an area might not report to Nielsen, so they could, for example, count every purchase as 2 copies in a store in that area to make up for not having any data for another store. Oh I see. Does BuzzAngle not count those stores at all or do they somehow get numbers that Nielson doesn't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHype. Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 Just now, Timber said: Oh I see. Does BuzzAngle not count those stores at all or do they somehow get numbers that Nielson doesn't? They use raw numbers. Stores that don't report aren't accounted for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timber Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 1 minute ago, iHype. said: They use raw numbers. Stores that don't report aren't accounted for. I see. Do you know why HDD sometimes reports higher numbers than BB? Based off of that, HDD's should always be lower. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHype. Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 Just now, Timber said: I see. Do you know why HDD sometimes reports higher numbers than BB? Based off of that, HDD's should always be lower. The same reason why their digital song sales numbers somehow differ despite iTunes being responsible for 99% of digital song sales, so in theory they should receive the same numbers. Strange stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zymphonic Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 (edited) 11 minutes ago, lemonade. said: ooh bitch, my prediction was right (https://blackboybulletin.wordpress.com/2017/10/17/will-taylor-swifts-reputation-open-with-over-one-million-pure-copies/) I should've entered the ATRL contest, **** You have two different predictions: Quote If she does a tour bundle I predict her pure sales will range from 1.05 million – 1.275 million; if there is no tour bundle and no further promotion before album release week, 895,000-1.15 million pure copies. If there is promotion/a strong new single before/during album release week, 950,000-1.2 million. We’ll just have to wait and see! Quote If she does a tour bundle I predict her pure sales will range from 1.25 million – 1.75 million; if there is no tour bundle and no further promotion before album release week, 950,000-1.15 million pure copies. If there is promotion and a strong new single before/during album release week, 1.275-1.35 million. We’ll just have to wait and see! Edited November 17, 2017 by Zymphonic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHype. Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 SPS: -- 1 TAYLOR SWIFTREPUTATION BIG MACHINE/BMLG 1,289,921 -- PURE: -- 1 TAYLOR SWIFTREPUTATION BIG MACHINE/BMLG 1,266,598 -- Didn't even surpass 1989's sales despite them saying it was on LOCK. Wtf? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemonade. Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 1 minute ago, Zymphonic said: You have two different predictions: dddd wait a minute the second one, I think I meant the first one under a different scenario, but I wasn't clear, thanks sis! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandewhispers Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 That's obviously huge and an amazing number, but mess at her team saying it would sell over 2M first week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timber Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 1 minute ago, grandewhispers said: That's obviously huge and an amazing number, but mess at her team saying it would sell over 2M first week Maybe they meant WW? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkboy Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 UK: 46k first day, 84k full week US: 717k first day, around 1.290M full week Similar pattern I think, the album is just pretty frontloaded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muddysquirrel Posted November 17, 2017 Share Posted November 17, 2017 The way she has kept her fanbase intact after 3 years. Once you stan its for life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Honeymoon Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 6 minutes ago, iHype. said: SPS: -- 1 TAYLOR SWIFTREPUTATION BIG MACHINE/BMLG 1,289,921 -- PURE: -- 1 TAYLOR SWIFTREPUTATION BIG MACHINE/BMLG 1,266,598 -- Didn't even surpass 1989's sales despite them saying it was on LOCK. Wtf? Oh! It was SPS numbers. Oops! is 90% safe, then. Her team and every publication really overestimated her by a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerlily13 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 A legend. No one else sans her and Adele are doing it in 2017!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATRL Moderator Verge of Obscene Posted November 18, 2017 ATRL Moderator Share Posted November 18, 2017 Wait. Is Oops’ record safe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slw84 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 30 minutes ago, Timber said: Yeah. BBs could be quite different tho. She might still beat Britney, or she might be under 1989. It's all so close! The thirst for someone else to surpass Britney's numbers, though. Britney, adele and taylor will remain the first week trinity for females either way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Honeymoon Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Verge of Obscene said: Wait. Is Oops’ record safe? 90% yes. It seems, very very unlikely that Billboard will report 53k more sales. Edited November 18, 2017 by Blue Honeymoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slw84 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Verge of Obscene said: Wait. Is Oops’ record safe? What record? you mean Adele's 3M+ record. What is safe is Adele, Britney and Taylor remain trinity. Whether it's Adele then taylor then Britney or Adele then Britney then Taylor they remain above the rest for first week sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucyyyyyyyyy Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Adele took Britney’s record a few years ago where have you guys been Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iHype. Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Verge of Obscene said: Wait. Is Oops’ record safe? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATRL Moderator Verge of Obscene Posted November 18, 2017 ATRL Moderator Share Posted November 18, 2017 Yes, I know Adele beat Brit. I mean, Brit’s still 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Honeymoon Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Just now, Lucyyyyyyyyy said: Adele took Britney’s record a few years ago where have you guys been When people say "Britney's record", they mean her second place among females with highest first week sales. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slw84 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Blue Honeymoon said: 90% yes. It seems, very very unlikely that Billboard will report 53k more copies. It's also no longer a Britney record as of November 2015. Let these 3 phenomenons achieve above the rest in peace... Edited November 18, 2017 by slw84 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.5c069777b1ab1d704a32825806767213.png)
Recommended Posts