My Tears Ricochet Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 Just now, Trent W said: Adele is not mediocre, 19 and 21 were great bodies of work. They were ok at best. As an artist, she's mediocre. No scope for reinvention, c rated vocals, boring music videos and performances, has no work ethics and treats her fans horribly by often cancelling shows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bestfiction Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 Beyoncé is a legend. Adele is not there yet, so the answer is no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yeezytaughtme Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 No, I think Beyoncé has a bit of a bigger career then Adele. Adele is huge, no doubt, but Beyoncé has had a longer career with more achievements. Adele has some impressive accomplishments though too in her shorter timespan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badgalbriel Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 Beyonce is a much bigger, more talented and bolder artist. Adele has good numbers now but those will fade with time. Beyoncé also had great numbers a decade ago. The state of her career right now does not cancel her achievements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BILLIONAIRE✘BOY Posted June 23 Author Share Posted June 23 (edited) 23 minutes ago, BnPac said: Adele Britney I wonder who some monsters will use next, Taylor? OT : Commercially no one is on Adele's level. But it's amazing to know the biggest artist in the world is a Hive member. We're an impressive group. what do you mean use? I'm a fan of both artists Edited June 23 by BILLIONAIRE✘BOY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brando Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 2 hours ago, supertiffany said: most of the successful women are REINVENTING doing Adele, staying the same and being completely ZERO and ABSENT for every 5 years, twice, then comeback like it's nothing but smash with 10 weeks #1 is just unparalleled and impressive I don't know what any of this has to do with anything I said I was just saying that Adele's lead was super accessible and easy listening, tailored 100% for radio success. While Beyonce's lead is wild, not for the masses and aimed at gay clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnusualBoy Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 43 minutes ago, Blue G said: She had an almost 10 year start on Adele. Of course she's more awarded. But who gets awarded over the other when they are nominated against each other. Girl, that's only the grammys, elsewhere you see critics and publications kissing the ground Bey's walks in with Formation/Lemonade being an example of that, snatching awards back and forth and that happened during Adele's 25 era... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mxoonlight Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 In name value yeah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnusualBoy Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 5 minutes ago, Brando said: I don't know what any of this has to do with anything I said I was just saying that Adele's lead was super accessible and easy listening, tailored 100% for radio success. While Beyonce's lead is wild, not for the masses and aimed at gay clubs. A house track with repetitive lyrics not being for the masses and only aimed at gay clubs? This sounds like something a monster would say during the Chromatica era Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brando Posted June 23 Share Posted June 23 3 minutes ago, UnusualBoy said: A house track with repetitive lyrics not being for the masses and only aimed at gay clubs? This sounds like something a monster would say during the Chromatica era I'm sorry, but this is a straight up gay club track. There's not much to disagree about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts