Doctor Dick

This manipulative woman. Ugh, just flop with dignity you creep.

She's not bombarding her fans with content because of she cares about them, she's bombarding them with content because she wants to chart better.

The point of this thread is not what charted on the US Hot 100 chart and how it did in the US but what's the most popular female song globally. Your initial comment wanted to discredit Abracadabra because it failed to reach the top 10 in the US despite having reached it on the Global 200 chart and even your example of Choosin' Texas proves that just because a song is the biggest in the States doesn't mean it's also the biggest globally. It also proves a song not entering the Hot 100 top 10 can still be considered big globally if it spent weeks inside the Billboard Global 200 chart. And not you talking about the Global 200 chart being "easily manipulated" when your fave's two recent singles were #1 on the Hot 100 for multiple weeks despite being either N/A in the Top 50 streaming charts or weren't the most consumed and free-falling. Like your goalpost moving constantly is hilarious.

Yet you're omitting the Global 200 chart which is a sum-up of the world's most popular songs? How is that logical in a thread about worldwide popularity? By your logic, it's Choosin' Texas since that one did better in the US this year alone than the other songs.

Yeah. To think people suddenly just stopped listening to new music is dumb af. That would mean older music would grow way more than what the charts are showing us. It's them filtering way better than before. As simple as that.

All of these cleared the Top 10, genius. Including Abracadabra.

It's 2026, they were released in 2024.

Where's Birds of a Feather or Espresso? It's Birds of a Feather objectively with Espresso a close second.

Yet an Oscar is an Oscar and her recent achievements of having a critically-acclaimed album with two hits (one record-breaking collab and one solo) globally compared to a panned album with inorganic single success and three back-to-back-to-back flop singles is way better and sets up her next era much better than your inorganic desperate fave's.

An Oscar remains a more acclaimed award and more known than a Grammy though but you cling onto what you can. None of that changes the trajectory of going from winning those Grammys to having back-to-back-to-back flop singles and panned music. And I get that even your own fandom despises you but to act like Abracadabra's two-month Top 10 stay globally all that without pushing any physical singles from an acclaimed recent studio album (not everyone has that) is anything but organic while doing "limited-time only" variants with physical CD shipment purchased weeks ago to be sent in the exact time window you need for Hot 100 points is anything but inorganic just tells us all enough about you. Log a bit off, re-evaluate your arguments and come back. Maybe then you'll stand a chance at not losing an argument. Your constant posts are giving:

Certain acts' one week #1 is bigger in sales and streams and overall units along with better recurrent streams than 9 of a certain starlets "multi-week #1s" mentioned on this list so what good does having a multi-week #1 (in many cases a forced one) do?

No one said they weren't real but many of her accomplishments are manipulated and inflated. And why argue with any of us if you know you'll lose?

What @KOMH doesn't understand is Gaga or Billie or Olivia have areas like singing or acting or playing an instrument at a classically-trained level to dive into and excel at so their concentration naturally lies in perfecting those areas whereas an artist like Taylor has zero shots at perfecting any of those skills since she lacks them so she concentrates on perfecting her charts stats because without them she has nothing that could compete with them.

My definition of organic means a two-month SOLO Billboard Global 200 single despite no physicals, having her own collaboration on her own album and watching her music win an Oscar while being acclaimed for her vocal talent and speaking out about injustice at the absolute peak of her career not worried it will turn some people off because she stands for equality and doesn't just speak up when it can benefit her wallet or trying to break records with fraudulent "limited-time only" variants while trying and failing to win an Oscar or being seen as an acclaimed vocalist or performer and instead "scoring" back-to-back-to-back flop inorganic singles and panned music.

What's massive about this when the last two of your fave's multi-week #1s were manipulated through physical sales when the songs themselves were plummeting down the charts? Other pop girls with respect for themselves and their brand would've just let it be a single week because the inorganicness of if it all will only hurt the brand in the long run. Those are my thoughts. I do agree a certain starlet with massive organic success both in collaborations (certain other vocally-impared acts can't relate) and solo with critically acclaimed recent studio albums with more than one global hit is missing but that doesn't take anything away from her success considering it's looked at as organic while certain other acts will always have a * attached to multiple of their #1 "hits". And I just know @Link16 @Fluch and @REALiTi and anyone sane agrees.