bringdanoize

If this was the true, Beyoncé wouldn't have had babies, I doubt her writing credits for all career combined brought more than DWAS for Gaga.

It's not an article, it's an official statement by Amazon CEO, argue with that.

Amazon prime subscriber doesn't mean automatically Amazon Music subscriber, subscription needs to be activated first. If that take was true, Amazon Music would have 200M users as Amazon prime and would be the biggest streaming service in USA by market share, bigger than Spotify.

Please read the discussion before answering.

yes, that's true about active listeners, I've meant by active the ones who activated their subscription, not the one who listen. But you said that everyone who has Amazon Prime is automatically a subscriber on Amazon Music, which is a lie.

pointing out that swifties are spreading lies by commenting on a lie is typical OTH behavior, thanks for confirming.

This is a lie. Amazon Prime has around 200M users in USA, Amazon Music has around 50M users in USA, which are active in a platform. The only fraudulence here is that Amazon streams counts as paid when actually there are not, because people mostly pay for Prime, not for Amazon Music.

Response to what? where is the question? Gaga has flop albums, no one denied it, but she had smash albums that are remembered between them (ASIB and Mayhem). Beyoncé hasn't had a remembered album for 17 years now (numbers don't lie).

So to make Beyoncé look at least somehow relevant we are now comparing her to Selena Gomez? Interesting.

she has feats with Drake, The Weeknd, Kendrick Lamar, Miley Cyrus, Post Malone, Jay Z, Frank Ocean, Nicki Minaj and more on these albums… even they didn't save her, so I doubt Bruno would change a thing

because Chromatica is a flop album, that's it. but it's fine, everyone has big and small eras. she is in top of 2025 albums. at least, it's not a situation, like Beyoncé one, where she doesn't have good recurring streams for any of her album since 2008.

no, I joined to get some kiis from stupideness of monsters who are doing such threads in 2026 when Billboard USA is at 0 level of relevancy and both parties didn't disappoint I would say. one with the thread, another with random takes and lack of reading comprehension.

Then tell that to Madonna fans who bring DWAS, not me. I don't know why they can't live one day without mentioning biggest song of the decade in a thread, which doesn't have any connection to it.

I don't care about US chart and never mentioned it even once in this thread, I completely agree that it doesn't matter and stand by my words. I only answered to the comment about DWAS and Madonna's lack of ability to pull it off, because of her vocals. It has zero connection to what you've sent. Did you even read the thread and my comments? I guess no, please next time read the discussion before answering, so you don't look like a fool. If you don't have anything to answer about Madonna's signing abilities (I'm assuming you can't if you have ears), you don't need to throw random takes in here. It really feels like I'm not even talking to real people. You are not the only one coming to the thread with random takes about completely different subjects.

These streams are coming from Pandora…. It has around 40M active users, but it's the most fraudulent streaming service ever, because with free subscription (around 35M users) you can't choose a song, it's like a radio. so, the fraudulence is here, yes, but not in numbers, it's the way how these numbers were acquired.