I'm sorry but this story just doesn't add up. Her hair is in NO WAY burned. Nor are her clothes. This is NOT a woman who sat in a blazing car for an hour, as the media has said. The woman we see in the helicopter video, her injuries are not consistent with her being subject to what the media claim she was subject to. Her hair is still very much in tact, as are her cotton items of clothing. I can't see anything, at that distance, beyond first or second degree burns. Even that is a stretch. Her skin looks vaguely dirty, but that is the extent of it. If she had been significantly lacerated in the crash, or in the kind of crash where they suspect bone injuries, they would have attached her to a solid board and strapped her down to prevent any further movement or injury. There is no blood on the sheets, she doesn't appear to be attached to any kind of IV. She is essentially fine.
3 separate videos prove she was trying to stop the car, which being digital with fly by wire tech as all post 2005 high end cars have installed. At the scene, her parking brake was fully deployed. All saw the video of the screeching brakes and her getting up of the stretcher. EMTs zip her up after slamming morphine into her; she fights back, last anyone sees of her alive.
Why is there such a discrepancy between the videos and the media's story?