Magickarp Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 8 hours ago, Sawk said: I would love to see a ranking rate instead of a score rate, that'll make stuff REALLY interesting and will limit the riggery and scammery. That won't work, It will increase sabotage because people will put Milotic at -136 instead of -11 Also, who is gonna sort 100+ Pokemon in order, be realistic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poki Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 19 minutes ago, Curaga said: Does this mean you would rank each Pokémon from 1 to 120 (or however many entries), and #1 would get 100 points, #2 gets lower, #3 even lower, etc.? I used this method for a Disney movies rate I hosted back in 2017 (I want to redo this rate later this year). I limited everyone to send in 20 movies only so it went by okay but when this method was attempted for a Britney Spears Discography Rate, a lot of members didn't want to do that method. Maybe I could do this for my Sword & Shield rate. I remember there's a website that helps to rank stuff like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawk Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 1 hour ago, Curaga said: Does this mean you would rank each Pokémon from 1 to 120 (or however many entries), and #1 would get 100 points, #2 gets lower, #3 even lower, etc.? something like that, or it could be done by who got the least amount of points, so like if you ranked tapu lele as ur 5th fave she would get 5 points, the mons with the lowest numbers would end up higher in the rate and whatnot, just an idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawk Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 (edited) 1 hour ago, Magickarp said: That won't work, It will increase sabotage because people will put Milotic at -136 instead of -11 Also, who is gonna sort 100+ Pokemon in order, be realistic It won't increase sabotage because you can't do it to a majority of mons, sure, you can still put your least faves at the end, but it forces people to be more selective about their choices and not just spam 1 on everything they don't stan. As for the laziness part, true, I myself am lazy af and always send in the rates late, but it's not like it'll take that much more time, all you would have to do is cut and paste the names onto a ranking list. It's just a suggestion/idea btw, It's not even a perfect change by any means, but it could be a cute change of pace that can maybe make the rating just a tad more objective & less braindead. Edited August 5 by Sawk typo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suilen Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 Well, we'll see how the modifier system will go. Ideally, 1s will have less of an impact there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawk Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 1 hour ago, poki said: I used this method for a Disney movies rate I hosted back in 2017 (I want to redo this rate later this year). I limited everyone to send in 20 movies only so it went by okay but when this method was attempted for a Britney Spears Discography Rate, a lot of members didn't want to do that method. Maybe I could do this for my Sword & Shield rate. I remember there's a website that helps to rank stuff like this. I think at least trying it once would be cool, but I'm not gonna pretend like it's something everyone wants either. I know members live for the messiness, the idea just popped into my head since spamming low scores is lowkey a cop out to not have to really think about the choices in order to just payola the faves. It seems more objective to rank the mons in a gen rather than scoring them, if there's a website that could even help, that would be so cool and could ease the process. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magickarp Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 People care more about 1s, than a dupe voting & hosting multiple rates 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawk Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 2 minutes ago, Magickarp said: People care more about 1s, than a dupe voting & hosting multiple rates Well, yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohno Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 I think it's a great idea. Cause some of yall seriously gave Gardevoir the same score as Binacle like be for real... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conker Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 I'm still astonished how Mega Sabeleye is still in this. I guess being the Gen 3 winner, doesn't mean anything. I like Sableye but, I had to give his Mega counterpart a 1. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heldenzeit Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 (edited) 3 hours ago, Magickarp said: People care more about 1s, than a dupe voting & hosting multiple rates Let's make our voices heard and boycott the **** & Shart rate! Edited August 5 by Heldenzeit 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graves Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 7 hours ago, Ohno said: I think it's a great idea. Cause some of yall seriously gave Gardevoir the same score as Binacle like be for real... Not true, please stop with this fake news. Gardevoir got a 1, Binacle got a 2. 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heldenzeit Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 waiT, they're kinda serving the same colour scheme. I get the connection now! 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bartender Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 Top 20 serving taste Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohno Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 I'll pray for you Kathi,you and that disgusting mouth of yours. God Bless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curaga Posted August 5 Author Share Posted August 5 7 hours ago, Conker said: I'm still astonished how Mega Sabeleye is still in this. I guess being the Gen 3 winner, doesn't mean anything. I like Sableye but, I had to give his Mega counterpart a 1. You apparently had to give every Mega except Mega Problematicism a 1, so this rationale about Sableye holds no weight imo. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heldenzeit Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 You wanna guess the colour of tonight's first out You wanna know what @Curaga's got going on in ha cloud 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sunbathinganimal Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 average straight couple 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heldenzeit Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 average gay couple 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnusualBoy Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 13 hours ago, Curaga said: Does this mean you would rank each Pokémon from 1 to 120 (or however many entries), and #1 would get 100 points, #2 gets lower, #3 even lower, etc.? I think this would help to avoid all this nonsensical #1 to pokemon that are not 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohno Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 3 hours ago, Curaga said: You apparently had to give every Mega except Mega Problematicism a 1, so this rationale about Sableye holds no weight imo. It took me a bit to realize who you are talking about fklsdjlkfdsjfdjl 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewan Chaos Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 My 11 leaving and my 0 still in and I'm 99% sure will be top 10 NO The way my 11 for Hoenn left at #11 and my 11 here left at #21... I'm cursed. People seeing the original top 10 really decided to tank so many of the Pokemon huh nn and how aggressive people have been with the Megas is funny even though there's quite a few of them still in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Funnyfatty Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 Well actually that would make the rates much much easier and harder to fraud. Giving everything other than your fave a 1 is just taking away all the fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolcristobal Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 (edited) Y'all can limit 1's all you want but I'm still gonna give them to "objective non-1's" like Gardevoir and the rest of her kin idgaf Edited August 5 by coolcristobal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curaga Posted August 5 Author Share Posted August 5 15 minutes! @AbeHicks @Album Leak @AMIT @artc0cx @BambiStar @Bartender @Chiidish @Conker @coolcristobal @Dark Miracles @elevate @Ewan Chaos @FallenFroot @Funnyfatty @gardendreams @Gourgeist @Heldenzeit @JoeRobert @Konril @LastKiss @Lord Gaga @Losing my ground @Magickarp @memeboy @Mocha @Nico Robin @Norte @Ohno @plaidarms @PMM @poki @Ponzi @queenp @Rabbit @Red Light @Rence @Rigalo @Rune @Sawk @Seffers @SlowGinFizzzz @Subomie @Suilen @sunbathinganimal @Touch Pass @UnusualBoy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts