1 minute ago, Lennox. said:

 

nnn.

 

What proposed logic are you using here? 

 

- If "This Is What You Came For" was discounted the last two weeks of "Cheap Thrills" being at #1 on the Hot 100, Rihanna would have scored her 15th #1.

 

- If "Wild Thoughts" had been discounted a week or two later than it was, Rihanna would have scored her 16th #1.

 

- If "Ready For It" was released several weeks after it was and not dead in the centre of "LWYMMD's" chart run then Taylor Swift would have easily scored her 7th #1.

 

ETC.

 

I can go on and on about the "If's" and "But's" but what matters is reality, an the reality is that Minaj still as no #1 after 90 attempts and WE ALL KNOW that she wants one.

 

Also, regardless of whether or not "Bodak Yellow" would have went #1 in 2010 is irrelevant. The fact remains that it did go #1 I 2017 and that is what's important. 

My point is, that a #1 is not everything and that too much weight is placed upon it.

You have just shown my point, they are often so fickle and based on the tiniest little release decisions.

Iggy has a #1 and now she can't even chart on Billboard.

How many of them was top 50?

Good for her. She tries hard.

19 hours ago, thedastardly said:

More than two-thirds of Drake's entries are leads, while way less than half of Nicki's are leads. So. 

Leads due to streaming. Take away streaming and he wouldn’t have as many. Don’t try it.

Lol

Edited June 20, 20188 yr by calm_down