brazaquitos

It's not that bad. A 2.0 for white straight men on pitchfork equals a 7.0 for a black woman. it's better than Lizzo's album (6.5)

I was ready to see Beyoncé lose, but definitely not to this awful album. On the other hand, I'm glad Adele didn't have to go through another cringeworthy apology while accepting the award.

shouldou toda

It was hardly possible to go down from last year dismal ratings so

Taylor Swift ex boyfriends

So, it's confirmed, you literally have no idea of how the scientific method works. No, just being published later doesnt qualify a study as invalidating further research. It specifically needs to refute the fundamentals of previous reserch in order to be qualified as such.

She was 100% ecstatic about Lizzo winning ROTY, it was so nice to see

That's ok, she has 2 AOTY Grammys which are very difficult to get, not everyone has them

This

It's indeed not good that Beyoncé decides to put her album in a category filled with independent and alternative artists just to make sure she frauds her way into two easy grammys on name recognition instead of facing big names like her on pop I think this might be one of the reasons for the lack of goodwill among the academy with her

Gosh I hate the beyoncé cult but she really deserves this AOTY

OMG SO HAPPY FOR HER

Carlile is winning AOTY

OMG LOL

Hopefully they put the annual H.E.R grammy award in this social change mess and let actual artists win ROTY and SOTY

Beyoncé is hiding behind the curtain and will only show up if she gets AOTY

Trevor Noah is doing awful here

It would be so iconic if Bad Bunny won

You think that when a study cites the need for future research and another study published later has different results the first one is automatically invalidated? Please answer honestly

It kinda sounds like you think that when one study gets published and reaches a different conclusion it automatically renders all previous studies invalid on anteriority alone, without refuting their fundamentals sis this is not how science works

I read the whole link and it doesn't refute in any way the 1/3000 probability though What about all the studies that say GBS and vaccination are linked? Let me guess, the prestigious journals in which they were published were bribed? It kinda sounds like you are arguing, in 2023, that vaccination is an effective way of prevention against covid infections and transmission, which is ok if you haven't read any research in 2 years

Beyoncé lowkey deserves it this time TBQH, even though I'd be glad if she loses again to see the fumes

you know what's also extremely rare? Healthy people with Zachary Levi's age dying of covid (less than 1 per million) https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/data-review/risk.html but for some reason apparently he's a monster if he doesn't choose the apparent 1/3000 chance of developing the Guillain-Barré syndrome

Lemonade losing AOTY was one of the best calls of all time. An album with no hits and no relevance forced down people's throats on fabricated media impact. It's almost like they knew it'd be doing 400k daily streams in 2023