MothtoaFlame

Another fine performance from Pete. I'm curious to see if this debate will help or not Klobuchar. It looked a little ambiguous to me.

I will not argue with your bad faith questioning and personal insults.

Not when they're tracking many social minorities. African Americans tend to be put in a single category. Like I said, the criticism is valid. But even as a flawed data, it holds a better ground than just guesswork.

That's an argument that could be used against most polls. And that's fine. But there's no evidence of a widespread dislike for Pete among LGBT people.

You can argue against Buttigieg's policies without putting his sexuality in the conversation. There's absolutely no need for this. Socialists just need to stop thinking they own the LGBT movement; they actually have a pretty bad record with it historically. And most LGBT people have a fairly positive opinion about Pete, so stop projecting your personal views on an entire group:

I guess that's why they already changed the article's title.

You only can be gay now if you're a socialist, according to Buzzfeed.

Very tight race in NH, it seems:

Nice to see Pete still doing good in Iowa, after two underwhelming national polls.

OH Predictive Insights' Arizona matchups poll (3-14/12): Biden 44 (-5) / Trump 46 (+2) Buttigieg 43 (+6) / Trump 45 (-1) Warren 41 (-1) / Trump 47 (-) Bloomberg 40 / Trump 47 Sanders 34 (-3) / Trump 47 (+1) https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/473624-buttigieg-biden-tie-trump-in-arizona-poll

Seems like he won again.

Pete is doing very well in the RCP average (and Bernie is stagnant), so I'm not sure how you came to this conclusion.

Newest Economist average update.

By the way... Ipsos Poll (12/4-5): Don't Know 31% (+11) Biden 19% (-2) Sanders 14% (-3) Warren 9% (-2) Buttigieg 6% (-1) Bloomberg 4% Yang 3% (-2) Everyone else at >2%