paperfectdelusion Posted October 6 Posted October 6 2 minutes ago, PMM said: i mean she's not wrong would you as a record label hire some pop star who don't sell much albums? do you know what showbiz means? money. They are not gonna invest in something that don't give them profit Except bad box office performance always result from bad directing/ scripts instead of actors. She is just trying to put the blame on the actor like she always does. 2
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, FrederickGa said: Liddos acting deranged because Grace Randolph is dropping truth bombs JFAD is a disaster in all fronts and only delusional liddos will say this will not affect Gaga's acting career at all...lol i don't think it's delusional I think it's age. they are probably like 8-11. They will be more knowledgeable in the future. 2 6
Dämon Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, Hot Volcano said: Yes but overall consensus was that the movie itself was bad. Gaga is being praised af. Okay, but studios care about 1) money 2) awards. Gaga being praised by some reviews doesn't change the fact she and Phoenix couldn't save this movie. im not saying Grace is 100% right but she's got some points. Gaga really needs to choose her next movie carefully. 8
FrederickGa Posted October 6 Posted October 6 20 minutes ago, Hair said: I... really don't think $121M is that bad? Although I don't really do films so I have no idea, I get that it was obviously projected to do more. Also, I thought the $200M budget thing was debunked, I guess it is actually true then? It is BAD. That $121M shouldve been DOMESTIC OW alone But $80M OS is decent tbh
BlondUnicorn Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Gaga won the f*****g New York Film Critics Circle award for Best Actress for HoG, an award that's been given since 1935. I swear that's not talked about enough. 5 1
opbranden Posted October 6 Posted October 6 That Todd fůçƙēř is stirring up trouble and turning us against each other— omg I hate him! We need to come together and protect our MOTHER! 1
kwek_kwek Posted October 6 Posted October 6 3 minutes ago, PMM said: i mean she's not wrong would you as a record label hire some pop star who don't sell much albums? do you know what showbiz means? money. They are not gonna invest in something that don't give them profit she's wrong and you're wrong. Music industry is different from movie industry. Bffr. Margot Robbie had flops in 2022 back to back and did not have a break and starred in Barbie. Other actors as well. Cate Blanchett just had a flop novie this year, so you think she should take a break as well? besides, Gaga is not the reason why the film was panned. She is actually the best part of the film according to critics and to those who have seen the film. 8 1
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, paperfectdelusion said: Except bad box office performance always result from bad directing/ scripts instead of actors. She is just trying to put the blame on the actor like she always does. no. it's not like that. turn the table around sure the performance is caused because of script and directing, but actors are taking the hit Imagine putting J:FAD in your CV 0 profit, hate etc. Would you hire person like that? 1 7
GipJo Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, PMM said: i mean she's not wrong would you as a record label hire some pop star who don't sell much albums? do you know what showbiz means? money. They are not gonna invest in something that don't give them profit In film, producers/director/writers are the equivalent of music artists, not actors. If they continue to deliver flops then they will abandoned. In which case it's Todd Phillips, Emma Tillinger Koskoff, Joseph Garner and Scott Silver. 1
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, kwek_kwek said: she's wrong and you're wrong. Music industry is different from movie industry. Bffr. Margot Robbie had flops in 2022 back to back and did not have a break and starred in Barbie. Other actors as well. Cate Blanchett just had a flop novie this year, so you think she should take a break as well? besides, Gaga is not the reason why the film was panned. She is actually the best part of the film according to critics and to those who have seen the film. take the fact that this is her 3rd major role, and please don't compare Gaga to Margot and Cate who are professional actresses. You look stupid. "besides, Gaga is not the reason why the film was panned. She is actually the best part of the film according to critics and to those who have seen the film. " true. but do you know the consequences of it? when you google joker 2 it's not the Toad who appears first. It's gaga and Joaquin 11
Bhumisah Posted October 6 Posted October 6 We still have China and Japan release to add on to the gross
kwek_kwek Posted October 6 Posted October 6 5 minutes ago, PMM said: but gaga is associated with this movie. Film industry is not the same as music one. Toad Joaquin and Gaga will take all the damages You said it. If you flopped in music, it'll be harder to comeback compared to film. Did Babylon and Amsterdam affect Margot's career?
Dämon Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Are we seriously comparing Cate Blanchett to Gaga? y'all treat this as some pop music **** 1 3
kwek_kwek Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, PMM said: take the fact that this is her 3rd major role, and please don't compare Gaga to Margot and Cate who are professional actresses. You look stupid. "besides, Gaga is not the reason why the film was panned. She is actually the best part of the film according to critics and to those who have seen the film. " true. but do you know the consequences of it? when you google joker 2 it's not the Toad who appears first. It's gaga and Joaquin So, Gaga is not a professional actress? Lol. Why you compare music to movie industry to your original post when they completely different? You look more stupid comparing the two industries. 1
opbranden Posted October 6 Posted October 6 (edited) Amy Adams and Glenn Close are both amazing actresses. Despite being in some bad movies or flops, they continue to get work, are loved and respected, and neither has an Oscar. So please stop pushing the idea that Gaga's career is over or that she'll be forced to do JustEat ads to survive. If she wanted to she could produce a movie herself and the studios would fight to get distribution rights, please be real. It's lady ******* gaga. Edited October 6 by opbranden 6 4
kudmips7890 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Dämon said: Are we seriously comparing Cate Blanchett to Gaga So who can we compare her to? Is she not an actress in Hollywood? Kristen Stewart, Margot Robbie, etc. all have had stumbles and look at them now. Yes, Gaga needs to pick her next film carefully. But you're acting like this has thrown her off a cliff and is something unrecoverable for the next decade
Dämon Posted October 6 Posted October 6 5 minutes ago, GipJo said: In film, producers/director/writers are the equivalent of music artists, not actors. If they continue to deliver flops then they will abandoned. In which case it's Todd Phillips, Emma Tillinger Koskoff, Joseph Garner and Scott Silver. Industry-wise perhaps. GP-wise, who do you think they'll remember? The people behind the cameras or the actors they spent 2 hours watching while being bored and absolutely HATING the movie? 1 1 3
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 6 minutes ago, GipJo said: In film, producers/director/writers are the equivalent of music artists, not actors. If they continue to deliver flops then they will abandoned. In which case it's Todd Phillips, Emma Tillinger Koskoff, Joseph Garner and Scott Silver. crew will not be affected. Producers, Director, Actors, etc. will Actors can face scrutiny from the media and public. A series of poorly received films can lead to being typecast or losing leading roles.
FrederickGa Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, opbranden said: Amy Adams and Glenn Close are both amazing actresses. Despite being in some bad movies or flops, they continue to get work, are loved and respected, and neither has an Oscar. So please stop pushing the idea that Gaga's career is over or that she'll be forced to do JustEat ads to survive. If she wanted to she could produce a movie herself and the studios would fight to get distribution rights, please be real. It's lady ******* gaga. The conversation is about Producers trying to get Gaga for major films Not Gaga's ability to produce a movie herself ala Madonna's rotten filmography Full time actors already had their films booked for what? 3-5years and multiple showing annually.. it's a different story for a POP STAR who pops in the Film Industry once evry 3years 1 2
kudmips7890 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 2 minutes ago, opbranden said: Amy Adams and Glenn Close are both amazing actresses. Despite being in some bad movies or flops, they continue to get work, are loved and respected, and neither has an Oscar. So please stop pushing the idea that Gaga's career is over or that she'll be forced to do JustEat ads to survive. If she wanted to she could produce a movie herself and the studios would fight to get distribution rights, please be real. It's lady ******* gaga. Even Taylor keeps getting film work despite Cats, Amsterdam, and her failure to make her ATW film some critical darling. She's building a relationship with the guy in charge of Searchlight and rubs shoulders with Guillermo del Toro despite NOTHING about her filmography, acting or otherwise, making notable splashes with Hollywood. What are these users going on about? 6
Dämon Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, kudmips7890 said: So who can we compare her to? Is she not an actress in Hollywood? Kristen Stewart, Margot Robbie, etc. all have had stumbles and look at them now. Yes, Gaga needs to pick her next film carefully. But you're acting like this has thrown her off a cliff and is something unrecoverable for the next decade and why do you think it took Kristen Stewart so ******* long to be recognised by the industry? again, are we saying gaga is not gonna get any acting jobs in the future? No. We're saying the reputation around her name will be damaged. Two ******* different things. 1
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 6 minutes ago, kwek_kwek said: You said it. If you flopped in music, it'll be harder to comeback compared to film. Did Babylon and Amsterdam affect Margot's career? yes. that's why she was a director and producer in barbie gaga is not a household name in movie industry where is Hilary Swank? one of the best actress out there. 2 oscar winner. later movies were flops 2 1
FrederickGa Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, kudmips7890 said: Even Taylor keeps getting film work despite Cats, Amsterdam, and her failure to make her ATW film some critical darling. She's building a relationship with the guy in charge of Searchlight and rubs shoulders with Guillermo del Toro despite NOTHING about her filmography, acting or otherwise, making notable splashes with Hollywood. What are these users going on about? And look at Taylor's materials, same with Madonna Getting ass roles is not the same with getting meaty lead roles
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 8 minutes ago, Dämon said: Are we seriously comparing Cate Blanchett to Gaga? y'all treat this as some pop music **** right? XD 7 minutes ago, kwek_kwek said: So, Gaga is not a professional actress? Lol. Why you compare music to movie industry to your original post when they completely different? You look more stupid comparing the two industries. from a business pov, GP pov 2
Recommended Posts