Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
27 minutes ago, Kristie Kuwa said:

Honestly no. My bestie, who is not a fan, actually pointed out how its quite unfair to the people in Stockholm how little she gave them energy-wise compared to now. He sees some of the clips on TikTok and says the difference is crazy, so the wristbands are just another thing on top

yeah that’s another annoying thing she does, since FWT/OTR II she started treating Europe like rehearsals, we always get less energy, less choreo, less new songs and no surprise performers…

 

and she clearly doesn’t try to hide any of it which is just disrespectful atp especially when "always giving 100% everywhere" was part of the Beyoncé brand but oh well.. being organized used to be too :devil:

  • Like 3

  • Replies 120.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Devin

    5526

  • ShouldersSideways

    4714

  • Lose My Breath

    3596

  • ScorpiosGroove

    3158

Posted
2 hours ago, family.guy123 said:

I’m still trying to understand the logic behind only having the wristbands for the filmed show (allegedly). Does she think her fans are going to be happy watching a show that 90% of them didn’t get to see (but helped pay for)?

have you seen the trailer for miss neck's tour film? the wristbands highlight the scope, show how many thousands of people are in the audience. its because it looks good on camera.

Posted (edited)

I don’t get the notion that Europe doesn’t get treated right. Australia nor Brazil have seen her in over 10 years. Didn’t blue ivy debut in Europe? Barcelona was epic,  she added the DJ to the London shows, which celebs flew out too. All of them were amazing , including Paris. 
 

And frankly, energy aside, Stockholm still had one of the best shows. Full show seamlessly. 
 

Some of Taylor’s shows get surprise guests, others don’t. That’s pretty common in concerts.

 

And formation tour began in the US. I don’t recall anything different. 

Edited by sillycilla
  • Thanks 3
Posted
16 minutes ago, swissman said:

FWT didn't come out was because she was also at the same time working on/planning Coachella, and foresaw that it could be a good moment/concert to release as well, and releasing them close together next might make either or both not have the same attention, impact and care from audiences.

 

 

someone with a brain, finally. this is literally the reason (+ the timing of the pregnancy)

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Shelter said:

The meltdowns :deadbanana2: you all complain about the smallest things. 
 

If we get the visuals, the tour, then act 2, that would be insane tbh

Lets start complaining about eachother. 
 

When you getting an avi I’m tired of seeing that blue letter S 

 

:rogue:

  • Haha 4
Posted

There's always a perfect reason for Beyoncé not doing something in particular that only apparently people with brains here know about. :lmao:

 

Anyway that reason doesn't cut for my non-brain-having self. The more contents the better. 2 or 3 years between a tour and some live performance is OK. FWT was over in October 2016 and Homecoming came out in 2019.

Roseland 2011, Glastonbury 2011 and MCSWT in 2013. Neither took anything away from one another. 

 

It was not even a complaint on my part tbh. 

 

  • Thanks 4
Posted (edited)

 

I don’t see how Beyoncé easily releasing FWT concert which ended in 2016 would coincide with homecoming; released in 2019?  It didn’t need behind the scenes or any added things, just straight up concert. And editing didn’t have to be by her, only approved. 

Edited by sillycilla
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

Omg, I just remembered FWT was only 6 months long, April - Oct. And the RWT is shaping up to be the same. It really is the end.  

Edited by sillycilla
Posted
1 minute ago, sillycilla said:

I don’t see how Beyoncé easily releasing FWT concert which ended in 2016 would coincide with homecoming; released in 2019?  It didn’t need behind the scenes or any added things, just straight up concert. And editing didn’t have to be by her, only approved. 

because a lot of elements from FWT were recycled in homecoming, down to the runway. she clearly preferred the homecoming version of her show, so that's the one she chose to put out. same goes for Revel & MCSWT.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, yonsé said:

have you seen the trailer for miss neck's tour film? the wristbands highlight the scope, show how many thousands of people are in the audience. its because it looks good on camera.

I understand it looks good on camera. Know where else it looks good? In person. So why’d she only have them for one city? To mislead non-patrons into thinking that her concert movies are reflective of the actual show they’d get if they pay to see her? Cause that’s she’s doing. 

Posted

y'all say y'all be watching all her shows but don't realize that for a minute there she was just taking bits and pieces from her shows and using them in other shows. 

 

that Revel show was recycled at the super bowl 2013, the mrs. carter show, and eventually OTR i. when she got coachella, she took FWT, deconstructed it, and then rearranged all the songs for Homecoming, and then eventually OTR ii.

 

that's also part of why RWT is so exciting. it's the first time she's overhauled her arrangements in years.

  • Thanks 3
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, yonsé said:

because a lot of elements from FWT were recycled in homecoming, down to the runway. she clearly preferred the homecoming version of her show, so that's the one she chose to put out. same goes for Revel & MCSWT.

Sometimes I only want to watch the concert . I love the behind the scenes content in homecoming and story but it does tend to take you out of the performance. 

 

FWT would have been a great contrast. Another artist released a music documentary and concert film within the same year. No one had an issue.

Edited by sillycilla
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, family.guy123 said:

I understand it looks good on camera. Know where else it looks good? In person. So why’d she only have them for one city? To mislead non-patrons into thinking that her concert movies are reflective of the actual show they’d get if they pay to see her? Cause that’s she’s doing. 

because they are very expensive and a hassle to program/recycle.

Posted
Just now, sillycilla said:

Another artist released a music documentary and concert film within the same year. No one had an issue.

ok? well take that up with Beyonce mama, it was her decision.

Posted

Now now y'all. Not again

 

Gwuf.gif

Posted
1 minute ago, yonsé said:

ok? well take that up with Beyonce mama, it was her decision.

I’m just responding to your post LOL

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Otter said:

All the tours will see the light of day at some point 

unless you’re stealing them out of the vault yourself it’s just not realistic

Posted
5 minutes ago, yonsé said:

because they are very expensive and a hassle to program/recycle.

She can afford it. Other artists seem to manage just fine. 
 

But whatever, can’t wait to watch the show that will look nothing like the one I attended! 

Posted
1 minute ago, family.guy123 said:

She can afford it. Other artists seem to manage just fine. 
 

But whatever, can’t wait to watch the show that will look nothing like the one I attended! 

she can afford it. but seeing as she was dealing with technical issues almost every night, she probably didn't want to risk having more things go wrong. her production was MUCH more intricate and complicated than miss neck. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, yonsé said:

y'all say y'all be watching all her shows but don't realize that for a minute there she was just taking bits and pieces from her shows and using them in other shows. 

 

that Revel show was recycled at the super bowl 2013, the mrs. carter show, and eventually OTR i. when she got coachella, she took FWT, deconstructed it, and then rearranged all the songs for Homecoming, and then eventually OTR ii.

 

that's also part of why RWT is so exciting. it's the first time she's overhauled her arrangements in years.

And yet we still got I am Yours and Live in Roseland specials which were the exact same concepts essentially, the story of Beyoncés career with added behind  the scenes clips lol.. That didn’t stop anyone from enjoying them any less. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, sillycilla said:

I’m just responding to your post LOL

 

 

im just telling you why she didn't put it out. you are giving me feedback like i can change it, lol. just because some other girl put out two concert films doesn't mean bey will, we know she doesn't follow what everyone else does when it comes to her releases?

Posted
3 hours ago, family.guy123 said:

I’m still trying to understand the logic behind only having the wristbands for the filmed show (allegedly). Does she think her fans are going to be happy watching a show that 90% of them didn’t get to see (but helped pay for)?

Kinda, yeah 

Posted
1 minute ago, sillycilla said:

And yet we still got I am Yours and Live in Roseland specials which were the exact same concepts essentially, the story of Beyoncés career with added behind  the scenes clips lol.. That didn’t stop anyone from enjoying them any less. 

and she clearly did not like that. which is why she never did it again.

Posted
5 minutes ago, family.guy123 said:

She can afford it. Other artists seem to manage just fine. 
 

But whatever, can’t wait to watch the show that will look nothing like the one I attended! 

Don’t worry the show will come out in 5 years or so. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, yonsé said:

im just telling you why she didn't put it out. you are giving me feedback like i can change it, lol. just because some other girl put out two concert films doesn't mean bey will, we know she doesn't follow what everyone else does when it comes to her releases?

You take it as giving you feedback while I’m  telling you my perspective on why it doesn’t make sense. It is what it is lol

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.