TaylorsSquad

You're delusional. I'll stop here so you can be nostalgic for a bygone era.

So boosting the economy isn't an example of "impact" but a forgotten VMA performance is???

I agree like when Taylor toured and boosted the economy everywhere she went. I don't know a single other Pop girl capable of such a feat.

They all do you just have blind rage towards someone because she decimates your fave while making it look easy.

She can't cheat a system that Billboard itself created. You're aware of the variants argument would hurt artists with a smaller fanbase than Taylor, right?

Anyways yes consistent sales can make you a legend, it's not like a quick little debut album and then being completely irrelevant by your fourth Era. And impact being entirely dependent on chronically online people who romanticize the period of pop they experienced that the world has already forgotten about.

All I see is a 4x AOTY winner meanwhile Cathy Dennis carried why Britney even got a Grammy.

The poster who made this thread is a delusional Britney Stan still living in 2004.

Britney and Addison have Stan's

Kelly could still afford that ugly bird and now are they no longer a small business?

You are moving goal posts because you're bitter that TD has bigger hits than Baby/Oops. You are constantly moving goal posts with the whole "TOTAL ERA GROSS!!!! BUT BABY ONE MORE TIME IS BIGGER THAN ANY KATY SINGLE!!!! MORGAN WALLEN!!!!" Is you because you can't accept TD has more hits than Britney's two albums.

Bye Mariah.

If that's what it'll take for you to accept that TD had more hits than Baby/Oops combined than yes he has the most hits a stat I won't even care about beyond this stupid conversation because you live for moving goal posts. Better?

The only iconic Nov 6th release is coming

Britney fell off by 2004 and every time she released an Album or song that went #1 it was front loaded and entirely first week dependent. No one cared after the first week for a Britney release.