jinzo

You mean like calling anyone that disagrees with the mass importation of millions of people that want LGBT people dead as Neo-Nazi? Oh I forgot, it’s only far-left people that get to be the arbiters of who can say what and when to who. You just have to accept it and if you say anything back it’s label label label! You guys make all the rules and everyone else has to blindly obey.

Arguing about an argument. Throwing a tantrum over a word. Arguing pointless semantics. Throwing meaningless labels around. You haven’t addressed anything, your sole aim is to find sneaky methods to shut down the conversation in its entirety because the answers aren’t readily available in your far-left NPC playbook. Your little insults didn’t bother me the first time you said them, why do you think it bothers me the 10th and 11th time?

It’s bigoted to…be anti-homophobia? Yall just use words. No love, bigotry is just accepting that some people like to kill gays and apparently that’s fine and dandy! The excuses y’all make to excuse the execution of your LGBT brothers and sisters. Anything else you haven’t bothered to research you want to bring to my attention?

Getting out of what? So far you’ve done nothing to contribute to an argument or change my opinion whatsoever except throw a tantrum over a word. The overarching questions remain unanswered because you genuinely don’t have the bandwidth to answer them, love. You’re bringing a twig to a knife fight. Let the adults talk.

https://www.humandignitytrust.org/lgbt-the-law/map-of-criminalisation/ Since when are Jamaica, Zimbabwe or Papua New Guinea Muslim? Do the slightest bit of research before you bring your factually wrong contributions into the debate. You made a fact up in your head then imprinted it on me. And they call the Trump voters the ones that peddle in “alternative facts”

I know a gay that’s done coke with one of the pop girls at a party. Like, it’s not a big deal at all. They’re all doing it. Think what you like of it.

Describe, using empirical written evidence, where that happened. Communist’s “make stuff up in my head and then say you did it!” method of argument is truly rubbing off on y’all.

Supports freedom of expression for all then licks the salty asscrack of the biggest censorship machine on the planet. You square that circle. Supports LGBT rights for all then defends the biggest executioner of LGBT people on the planet. You square that circle. If you point out the vast hypocrisy of their circular thoughts you’re a Neo Nazi and how dare you!

Right? I’ll reply to the latest barrage of personal attacks later because I actually have to work for a living, but the fact that miss girl’s real world exposure is so low that everything that isn’t extreme leftism is literal Nazism is hilarious. Like are 85-90% of the world Neo-Nazis? Because I have these chats with my friends, work colleagues, family members etc and the only time I get such a visceral response is from the fragile crybullies on ATRL that think anything that isn’t literally Fidel Castro is neo-nazism. And let me NAAAWWWWWT see that person crying about reporting and banning others when they’ve done nothing but throw personal attacks day and night and I’ve not taken the bait, stooped to their level or reported them once. Even bragging about following me online when they were getting their ass handed to them like it’s some kind of threatening flex to shut me up. They get so nasty and personal when they’re losing the argument because they’re not used to being disagreed with in their echo chamber. Absolute crybully behaviour.

By saying that racism and homophobia are unacceptable? We can all just say words. I could say you're the neo-Nazi for thinking the opposite and vehemently supporting those who are pro-homophobia, love. Now, do you have another bag of asinine nothingness you wish to contribute or are you just going to keep throwing random labels around like the very essence of my being will be crushed and my heart will fall into a million pieces because a forum user said a thing to me online?

Right? It's just way easier for them to score cheap points on a pop music forum by dunking on stuff, shocker!!!, the majority of the population outside the far-left internet bubble thinks. They bend over backwards to accommodate completely incompatible ultra-conservative, ultra-fundamentalist beliefs yet tell us WE'RE the bad guys for not doing the same. Asking questions = Neo-Nazi. Challenging the status quo = Neo-Nazi. Breathing, sleeping, eating, going to the toilet = Neo-Nazi.

Why does ATRL act shocked whenever drugs come up? Like, I know most of yall still live at home, but almost every grown adult I know does coke on a night out. I believe Beyonce does drugs for sure, but so does Gaga, Rihanna, Katy, Nicki, Adele etc.

I hate to break it to you, but if you can't stand the heat then get out the kitchen it's clear you don't really have anything to tell me that's going to contribute to the discussion that isn't NEO NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST REEEE!!!!!, you just want to shut the discussion down because you don't have anything in your little rolodex of far-left approved pre-programmed responses to give me. It's giving NPC. Oooooh lord. The caps. The colours. The screaming. The personal attacks. Is this an ~iconic post~ for you? Still, even after you spent hours of your night doing this (sounds fun!), you still haven't answered anything I put. You're still just belching random things you found off Google and Twitter at me and thinking it's a flex. Add some things like YOU ARE A NEO NAZI! in for good measure because, shocker, I want to protect GAY PEOPLE. HOW VERY NAZI! Words have zero impact when you don't use them right, love. I'm not fazed. I'm not changing anything about my viewpoint because you incorrectly threw a load of insults and slurs at me. It just highlights your mental age and lack of intellectual capacity when you have to resort to playground insults and diving into my post history to leak (false) personal information in a fit of toddler-like rage. Claim 1 - correct. Certain arrivals come from incredibly homophobic places. Why am I such a NEO NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST ALT RIGHT LITERALLY HITLER because I don't agree that we should import millions of people from places that directly come into conflict with my lifestyle? Is that selfish? Sure. But given the option of A) accept a load of anti-LGBT arrivals that will make LGBT people unsafe walking the street, B) don't because you literally don't have to, I'm choosing B. As you've mentioned a ton of times which is apparently a flex for you, MOST go to their neighbouring countries. So we're actually in agreement, as much as you keep acting like we're not. Arrivals should go to the place they'll have the best cultural fit. Ding! Point for me because you agreed with me. Claim 2 - you're not, because you can't get into power anywhere because everyone sees through your vile nonsense. just out of interest, because you still haven't answered, why do you agree with the unfettered, uncontrolled arrival of millions of people that don't follow a SINGLE progressive tenet and think it's perfectly fine and normal, yet you're responding with such exasperated, childish rage to me, someone who apparently is LITERALLY HITLER!!!! - so what I think is worse than thinking gay people should be murdered and women should be treated as second class citizens and be denied basic rights and education and be forced into a life of subservience? The selective rage is just hilarious to me because it makes no sense at all. Unless you can justify why certain 'unacceptable beliefs' (like mine apparently) are worth hours of your keyboard pounding, and other 'unacceptable beliefs' (like murdering gays) should be welcomed with open arms because we shouldn't expect refugees to ever assimilate (which is still the dumbest thing I've ever ******* read) then it's another point to me. Claim 3 - when did I create a false binary? Those are words you've put in your head. A binary would imply that I support either, which not at a single point I've done. I've asked you to pinpoint the specific moment I apparently supported Ukrainians and their racism (whilst also wanting to preserve ethnic purity, Schrodinger's Neo Nazi I guess?). I'm not really going to answer to things you've misquoted and falsely attributed to me just because you lack basic reading comprehension. It is wild however how you're sat here defending the rights of openly racist, homophobic and downright nasty people to continue to spout their hatred without consequence because apparently refugees don't have to change any aspect of their nastiness. Sweet little homophobic, racist, misogynistic cinnamon buns. Claim 4 - wrong. This is just wrong and you're badly informed. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SM.POP.REFG?locations=EU You can do the maths for yourself here but in the EU it's less than half. Just because you shout a lot and Google things a lot doesn't make what you say right. oh and I guess I was right about importing millions because the number is RIGHT THERE. Claim 5 - the UN article is about GERMANY, oh very smart one. is Germany non-white? The clue is in the URL. https://www.unhcr.org/uk/germany.html Read that? G-E-R-M-A-N-Y Would you like me to spell that out again for you? Claim 6 - Correct, I didn't. You're the one making things up in your head and then falsely attributing them to me, because nothing you say is based in reality and everything is a weird, cooked-up zero-sum game fantasy where everyone that isn't Chairman Mao is an alt-right neo-Nazi Literally Hitler fascist, and nuance and compromise don't exist (apart from weirdly all the millions of arrivals who are diametrically opposed to your beliefs in every single way which you still can't answer for) Claim 7 - again, random straw man out of nowhere to try and divert the conversation because you can't actually argue the point on your own merit. Who are you to tell me what I or people I know are concerned about? You live in New Jersey and I'm assuming still live at home. Just because something isn't top of my life doesn't mean we can't be concerned about it. You only exist in zero-sum games, don't you? It's either 100% or 0% with you. Why is that? I'm very concerned about protecting endangered animals, however if it comes down to it the key issues in my life are paying my mortgage and ensuring the wellbeing of my family. Trust the terminally online to categorise people into simple boxes because you don't actually have the nuance to consider complex situations. It's giving Trump voter. Claim 8 - Eastern Europe did open up its doors massively for Ukranian intakes, look at the numbers that Poland, Romania and Moldova took in. So once again, you're wrong.... but not just wrong, LOUDLY WRONG! Another straw man? Once again, you're proving my point that arrivals should go where there's an easy social and cultural fit for them, yet you're breaking your neck trying to make some weird fantastical point trying to make a point on the internet in front of all of your best friends. Claim 9 - seeing as you're such a fan of spending your free time stalking my personal information (totally normal behaviour btw), tell me which forums I was banned from? It's funny to me that apparently I'm sooooo intolerant, yet I've not been the one scraping the bottom of the barrel looking for every childish insult to hurl in a fit of desperate, childish, pathetic rage. I've stuck to the point at all times and you've been the one hurling every insult under the sun in because you think screaming insults at people is how you win an argument. Which class did they teach you that in? -- So, nothing you've said has actually moved the dial or changed my thoughts in any way - all you've succeeded in doing is making yourself look publically embarrassing. I thought you were quite smart before we chatted tonight, honestly. I see now that a lot of what you say doesn't make any sense beyond the surface level. I look forward to another venom-infused bunch of misinformed, false, easily disproven hot-takes, personal attacks, and straw mans. Create some more weird zero-sum games and pit me in them. Tell me how I'm Literally Hitler because I cherish my freedoms as an LGBT person. Have a blessed day.

I didn’t say “import millions of refugees” once Y’all just throw random labels and insults around that never actually give a coherent answer to a question, they just aim to shut down the conversation in its entirety because you don’t like hearing things that aren’t within your intellectually bereft echo chamber. And you wonder why no one votes for progressive politicians at any damn election. you never articulate your beliefs, you just yell and scream and throw tantrums if someone doesn’t ardently subscribe to things like uncontrolled arrival of people with anti-LGBT beliefs. Anyway, lovely as this has been to explore the cavernous reaches of certain people’s elementary knowledge and reading comprehension, I’ve got to be up for work in the morning.

I’ve counted 3 posts of mine you’ve been just haven’t been able to produce an intellectual response to. Why is that? Why is it that you aren’t able to debate intellectual points and you have to resort to desperate name calling, leaking of personal information, personal attacks, mud slinging, making up quotes then putting my name next to them (despite me never saying them) and anything else that could desperately deviate from the crucial integral point that you have no ability or intellectual capacity to have a grown up intelligent debate on anything despite all the peacocking and grandstanding?