Tovitov Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Good lord, not the base trying to argue Gaga's acting career is damaged now too. Not even the hetero males attacking the movie right now are going after Gaga. She'll be fine 6 1
kwek_kwek Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, PMM said: yes. that's why she was a director and producer in barbie gaga is not a household name in movie industry where is Hilary Swank? one of the best actress out there. 2 oscar winner. later movies were flops Margot was not the director. . It's Greta Gerwig. Gaga can produce films as well if she wants to. 5 3
Badgalbriel Posted October 6 Posted October 6 7 minutes ago, opbranden said: If she wanted to she could produce a movie herself and the studios would fight to get distribution rights, please be real. It's lady ******* gaga. Let's not get delusional now sis 1 2
kudmips7890 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, FrederickGa said: it's a different story for a POP STAR who pops in the Film Industry once evry 3years Ok, let's say she remains on that sporadic film schedule. Sis, if Taylor herself can keep inserting herself into roundtables, have dinners with people in charge of major studios, and get advice from directors like Guillermo del Toro himself, then what exactly is the different story? A failed Oscar run for some tired ATW short film and her appearance in two flops yet she somehow puts herself in Hollywood's orbit. Also, she even said she's focused on juggling multiple projects at once now and is in a different creative headspace. How do YOU know she hasn't been courted by other film producers? How do YOU know she isn't in talks for new film roles?
Dämon Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, FrederickGa said: And look at Taylor's materials, same with Madonna Getting ass roles is not the same with getting meaty lead roles Right Taylor having a cameo in Amsterdam is for sure the same as Gaga booking supporting or leading roles I guess.
hausofbryan Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Yikes at the $40M debut. I knew it'd disappoint, but that's a colossal failure for Warner Bros. At least the international number was respectable, but not enough to mask the disaster in the US. 1
Infernal Paradise Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Two things can be true. 1) JFAD is a panned bomb that will burn huge holes in WB's pockets as they're unable to recoup costs. 2) Gaga will continue to take on more roles since she's been praised by critics once again for what she brings on-screen and is also generally respected by her film industry peers (unlike so many other singers-turned-actors). She's also in a supporting capacity in a Joker film, thus Whackeen being the face of the film and the franchise. Nobody outside a braindead DC fanboy or an OGH'd troll thinks otherwise. You can hit the panic button when she doesn't announce any new lead roles in a long time but until then, she's safe so keep the meltdowns at bay please. 11
FailSafe Posted October 6 Posted October 6 (edited) Y'all Gaga's acting career will be fine. In all three movies that she starred in, she's critically praised. Many actresses still have careers despite being in flop movies AND being panned for their acting in the said movies. ASIB is critically and commercially successful. Gaga's acting is critically acclaimed and won several best actress awards. Hog is commercially successfully while having mixed reviews. Gaga's acting is critically acclaimed and won several best actress awards. JFAD is a bomb commercially and critically. But Gaga's acting once again is being praised and even upset many critics that she wasn't used more in the movie. The common denominator in all her three movies is that, whether they are a flop or a hit, she's ALWAYS being acclaimed as an actress. THAT is the reason why directors/producers will still continue to court her with scripts and why her career as an actress will be fine. Edited October 6 by FailSafe 13 1
Nicholai Posted October 6 Posted October 6 NOT THAT USER SAYING THAT MARGOT WAS THE DIRECTOR OF BARBIE You know nothing about the film industry girl. 2 5
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Spicy Pisces said: OGHs are getting in your head guys i think it's reality and living in reality world not in atrl forum 1 5
FrederickGa Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, kudmips7890 said: Ok, let's say she remains on that sporadic film schedule. Sis, if Taylor herself can keep inserting herself into roundtables, have dinners with people in charge of major studios, and get advice from directors like Guillermo del Toro himself, then what exactly is the different story? A failed Oscar run for some tired ATW short film and her appearance in two flops yet she somehow puts herself in Hollywood's orbit. Also, she even said she's focused on juggling multiple projects at once now and is in a different creative headspace. How do YOU know she hasn't been courted by other film producers? How do YOU know she isn't in talks for new film roles? No one knows, no one here fvckin knew a thing But to say that this BOMBAGE will definitely not affect Gaga's acting career is DELUSIONAL definitely not OVER but SHOOKt 6
Chasing Comet Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Damn some of y'all are getting brainrot from OGHs too I see 5 1 1
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Nicholai said: NOT THAT USER SAYING THAT MARGOT WAS THE DIRECTOR OF BARBIE You know nothing about the film industry girl. next time @ me. don't be scared
Ego. Posted October 6 Posted October 6 How could anyone who watched this try and pin this on Gaga Her role is minimal and at no point does the movie feel like it's revolving around her. Marketing was heavy on her, but the final product doesn't rely on her enough to justify blaming her for this flopping 1
kwek_kwek Posted October 6 Posted October 6 2 minutes ago, PMM said: right? XD from a business pov, GP pov The fact that this is just her first flop film, i don't think producers would not hire Gaga anymore. . Gaga still has the starpower to attract audience. She will still get offers the fact that she proved that she's a great actress. She just needs to accept better project.
opbranden Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Badgalbriel said: Let's not get delusional now sis What? You know it's true—40% of the people who saw House of Gucci on opening weekend went for Gaga. She has a strong pull at the box office, loved by many, a talented actress with a magnetic appeal. I'm not some cupcake fan, and I'm not even invested in her acting career, but Gaga will always attract an audience, and producers know it. She just needs to pick the right project, and for all we know, she may have already signed on for another film. I'm starting to belive Toad Syphillis is behind some accounts on ATRL
kudmips7890 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 3 minutes ago, FrederickGa said: getting meaty lead roles You haven't explained how those absolutely bombs Taylor's been in translates to building relationships with Searchlight studios, her roundtable showing, meeting with literal Guillermo del Toro, and possibly many other guarded things of interest she hasn't told fans and the public. How can this happen despite the absolute poor showing of a film reputation she's had? Gaga literally just needs to pick a better film next time. She's not some outcast in Hollywood because of JFAD 2
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, Ego. said: How could anyone who watched this try and pin this on Gaga Her role is minimal and at no point does the movie feel like it's revolving around her. Marketing was heavy on her, but the final product doesn't rely on her enough to justify blaming her for this flopping GP. "she was hired for this only because of musical aspect" "i won't watch other movies with her" those are not my words. 1 9
hausofbryan Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, PMM said: GP. "she was hired for this only because of musical aspect" "i won't watch other movies with her" those are not my words. No one thinks that, considering no one even saw the movie evidently. 4
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, kwek_kwek said: The fact that this is just her first flop film, i don't think producers would not hire Gaga anymore. . Gaga still has the starpower to attract audience. She will still get offers the fact that she proved that she's a great actress. She just needs to accept better project. compare J:FAD and ARTPOP in terms of business and GP she is a starpower, but the stain will remain 1 2
hausofbryan Posted October 6 Posted October 6 1 minute ago, kwek_kwek said: The fact that this is just her first flop film, i don't think producers would not hire Gaga anymore. . Gaga still has the starpower to attract audience. She will still get offers the fact that she proved that she's a great actress. She just needs to accept better project. She does have star power, but she needs to release more pop music to keep it going. That's where her fans come from, not her acting. So, LG7 lead we go! 1 1
kudmips7890 Posted October 6 Posted October 6 2 minutes ago, FrederickGa said: definitely not OVER but SHOOKt Sis, I'm literally mentioning over and over she needs to pick better roles next time I feel like you're just overreacting. I'm not saying Gaga doesn't need to do anything differently. JFAD is a definitely a lesson for her (and us ) and I think most of us here agree!
PMM Posted October 6 Posted October 6 Just now, hausofbryan said: No one thinks that, considering no one even saw the movie evidently. even here OGH are saying that so saying that no one thinks that is non logical 1
Recommended Posts