GraceRandolph Posted May 2 Posted May 2 https://twitter.com/nosferatusexgod/status/1786014219265294716
ZeroSuitBritney Posted May 2 Posted May 2 So at UCLA… Night 1: Zionists break into UCLA and then proceed to harass and physically attack peaceful protestors for 7 hours while the police just stood by and did nothing. Night 2: Police come in waves to UCLA and start attacking peaceful protests with tear gas, rubber bullets, flash bangs, etc and destroy their encampment. All this in a blue state with a blue mayor and two blue senators and a blue governor and a blue president. Biden doing everything he says will happen under a Trump presidency. That's our king 5
WeFoundWill Posted May 2 Posted May 2 the situation in Germany is truly scary. I'm being catapulted back to a very dark time in history.
Kassi Posted May 2 Posted May 2 These protests are losing their grip on the narrative and it's turning into a "law and order" debate. Just like we saw happen with BLM in 2020.
ClashAndBurn Posted May 2 Posted May 2 Again, the violence came from the pro-Israel mob and the police themselves. The protests themselves have been peaceful. What liberals actually mean is that they want is for the protests to be lawful, which is an oxymoron. Especially when it comes to protests against Israel, since no government official would be caught dead approving a permit for one of those, at risk of losing their job. Nazi rallies can certainly get cleared for permits, though! 6
ZeroSuitBritney Posted May 2 Posted May 2 3 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said: Again, the violence came from the pro-Israel mob and the police themselves. The protests themselves have been peaceful. What liberals actually mean is that they want is for the protests to be lawful, which is an oxymoron. Especially when it comes to protests against Israel, since no government official would be caught dead approving a permit for one of those, at risk of losing their job. Nazi rallies can certainly get cleared for permits, though! And also when literally all mainstream media and police force are united on making ceasefire protestors look like domestic terrorists (while also constantly ignoring the fact that many of the students and groups leading the encampments are Jewish), comparing their actions to the Holocaust, and simultaneously ignoring the real violence done by agitators at both the universities and more importantly, in Gaza (which the protestors have clearly tried to make their central focus consistently). Anything for Israel's protection 3 1
ZeroSuitBritney Posted May 2 Posted May 2 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Espresso said: I can't wait for this man to be unalive. The world will be a much better place without his dangerous ass. Edited May 2 by ZeroSuitBritney 3 2
Redstreak Posted May 2 Posted May 2 2 hours ago, ZeroSuitBritney said: So at UCLA… Night 1: Zionists break into UCLA and then proceed to harass and physically attack peaceful protestors for 7 hours while the police just stood by and did nothing. Night 2: Police come in waves to UCLA and start attacking peaceful protests with tear gas, rubber bullets, flash bangs, etc and destroy their encampment. All this in a blue state with a blue mayor and two blue senators and a blue governor and a blue president. Biden doing everything he says will happen under a Trump presidency. That's our king Biden sent in the national guard?
Bhabylon Posted May 2 Posted May 2 1 hour ago, Espresso said: **** this senile old man. Pretty sure genocide is against the law, but what do I know. I am so disappointed in this country. History will not look back on this kindly. I'm nervous because I feel like one day the US is going to get what's coming to us. Not that I want that, but I'm just saying. 1
Kassi Posted May 2 Posted May 2 3 hours ago, ClashAndBurn said: What liberals actually mean is that they want is for the protests to be lawful, which is an oxymoron. It is not. Wtf? There are many examples of peaceful, lawful protests: The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (1963) - The most famous peaceful protest in American history which saw 250,000 people gathered in D.C. to listen to MLKs iconic "I Have a Dream" speech. Women's March (2017) - Over 500,000 people participated in D.C. alone, with millions more across the United States and the world. March for Our Lives (2018) - Another nationwide protest where hundreds of thousands of people, led by students, called for tighter gun control after the tragic school shooting in Parkland, Florida. Even BLM 2020 was largely peaceful considering its scale (20+ million across the states), until chaos agents and cosplay socialists spun off to pursue their own violent objectives like the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) — an unlawful occupation protest and self-declared "liberated" zone. Sound familiar? There's NO rule that says protests MUST be destructive and/or violent to be effective or garner awareness.
Kassi Posted May 2 Posted May 2 The funniest thing about CHAZ/CHOP is that it established police, taxes, border patrol and a sticky immigration policy within a few weeks. That's clearly where these protestors are headed considering they have no real aim (no, trying to cancel Microsoft, Google, and Amazon is not a tangible objective). Not to mention, they have already exercised authoritarian tendencies over shared campus space. This is supposed to be a PUBLIC school… Can't make this **** up. 1 5
bunnyeyes Posted May 2 Posted May 2 40 minutes ago, Kassi said: The funniest thing about CHAZ/CHOP is that it established police, taxes, border patrol and a sticky immigration policy within a few weeks. That's clearly where these protestors are headed considering they have no real aim (no, trying to cancel Microsoft, Google, and Amazon is not a tangible objective). Not to mention, they have already exercised authoritarian tendencies over shared campus space. This is supposed to be a PUBLIC school… Can't make this **** up. This is misinformation. Not only is the picture not UCLA (It's Harvard), the reason the sign was put up was so that participants entering would have informed consent about the consequences of participating in the encampment. They were literally just looking out for people who may not have had the full picture to let them know they could face disciplinary action. Posting misinformation with one like is not helping your cause whatsoever. 9 1
ClashAndBurn Posted May 2 Posted May 2 56 minutes ago, Kassi said: It is not. Wtf? There are many examples of peaceful, lawful protests: The March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (1963) - The most famous peaceful protest in American history which saw 250,000 people gathered in D.C. to listen to MLKs iconic "I Have a Dream" speech. Women's March (2017) - Over 500,000 people participated in D.C. alone, with millions more across the United States and the world. March for Our Lives (2018) - Another nationwide protest where hundreds of thousands of people, led by students, called for tighter gun control after the tragic school shooting in Parkland, Florida. Even BLM 2020 was largely peaceful considering its scale (20+ million across the states), until chaos agents and cosplay socialists spun off to pursue their own violent objectives like the Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ) — an unlawful occupation protest and self-declared "liberated" zone. Sound familiar? There's NO rule that says protests MUST be destructive and/or violent to be effective or garner awareness. What did the Women's March and March for Our Lives achieve? Absolutely nothing. Abortion rights are gone and what minimal gun restrictions/background checks there have been have either been hobbled or are on the judicial chopping block. Also I seem to recall Madonna getting herself targeted by the Feds for saying at the Women's March that she dreamed of blowing up the White House, so yeah! Very peaceful! MLK? Was constantly under threat by the government who tried to get him to kill himself. What party was in charge back then? Oh yeah, that's right! The Democrats! Funny you bring up BLM though, since the violence at those demonstrations was almost always instigated by police and outside agitators. 3
Kassi Posted May 2 Posted May 2 8 minutes ago, bunnyeyes said: This is misinformation. Right right. "By Monday morning, the encampment at Royce Quad had grown to approximately 50 tents surrounded by wood and metal fencing. Protesters have appointed guards to block access to the public, including members of the media. KTLA 5 News witnessed those guards attempting to deny entry to UCLA firefighters who wanted to inspect the encampment Monday morning, although they were eventually allowed inside." https://ktla.com/news/local-news/pro-palestinian-protesters-denying-access-to-ucla-encampment/amp/ 1
Kassi Posted May 2 Posted May 2 20 minutes ago, ClashAndBurn said: What did the Women's March and March for Our Lives achieve? The real question is what will these camps accomplish since their primary goal of canceling Google is out of reach?
Recommended Posts