Jump to content

Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial


Coma Baby
Bloo
Message added by Bloo,

Mentioning @ATRL Feedback or @ATRL Administration does nothing. No staff member sees those notifications. If there is a member that is breaking ATRL rules, please report them and provide any additional context you think would better inform how we should judge it.

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, Raiden said:

No hun — not a single woman has come out and said JD hit me.

 

Get back to the drawing board and stop equating spousal abuse / domestic violence with manly brawls with big beefy meaty body guards and paparazzi and the like.

 

The only one with SA / DV history is AH. She literally got handcuffed for this.

Not you qualifying the type of abuse that is valid in this discussion, I thought y’all’s whole thing was #believeallmen :rip:

 

Also this lmao:

8 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

EXACTLY

 

Even here, we have misogynist @Raiden claiming no other woman has come forward with accusations against Depp. This person must have missed Ellen Barkin's testimony, where she claimed Depp was jealous, controlling, verbally abusive and threw a bottle at her direction one time in Las Vegas in '98. 

 

And what about that time he called the mother of his children "extortionist French ex CU.NT

89EjFuT.jpg

 

 

Edited by Headlock
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • NausAllien

    329

  • suburbannature

    225

  • Patient Zero

    187

  • Mobility Mary

    147

1 hour ago, Raiden said:

No hun — not a single woman has come out and said JD hit me.

 

Get back to the drawing board and stop equating spousal abuse / domestic violence with manly brawls with big beefy meaty body guards and paparazzi and the like.

 

The only one with SA / DV history is AH. She literally got handcuffed for this.

and why do you think that is :rip: like she said, look at what happened to her. Would you come forward?

 

 

edit: nvm someone DID come forward this was just another deppster lie

Edited by simon_xcx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG the interview. What a mess. Not Amber digging her grave deeper and deeper, over and over again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Headlock said:

Not you qualifying the type of abuse that is valid in this discussion, I thought y’all’s whole thing was #believeallmen

They deliberately chose to be specific not to contradict their own point. For some reason, the 'number' of victims matters, and following that logic, the user had to be very specific about the type of abuse the think is valid because they know  know that Depp is returning to court in a couple of weeks to face another victim who accused him of physical assault.

Edited by Weld_E
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Heard fanatics deflecting once again talking about cases that have nothing to do with this one. I'm not sure if you can read the thread title but it says "Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Trial", just in case you can't. Reminder that the verdict for the case in question, which has already been dealt with, will NOT change. Heard will remain a bankrupt LOSER. :clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Raiden said:

I haven't followed those other abuse accusations. Just a cursory glance indicates that they are entirely different from the JD-AH case: they all involve multiple victims (women who are unrelated to each other) accusing one man of something similar, unlike in case of AH, who alone claims to be JD's SA / DV victim. So even on the face of it, those other situations are fundamentally different and therefore credible in a way AH is not.

Not you opting to now claiking that men should be okay with getting it if it's Depp hitting them. Fraud ****. :skull:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Daydream said:

Reminder that the verdict for the case in question, which has already been dealt with, will NOT change.

You don't know that. The verdict could be easily overturned on appeal. She has multiple grounds for appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, NausAllien said:

You don't know that. The verdict could be easily overturned on appeal. She has multiple grounds for appeal.

No she doesn’t, there is absolutely no basis to claim jury misconduct. If there were her lawyers would already be doing filings which they haven’t. They’re going to argue, based off Elaine and Amber’s interviews, that the judge is at fault for not admitting evidence. 
 

Appeals court generally don’t override jury rulings and this judge was extremely fair to BOTH sides. Her appeal isn’t going anywhere. 
 

Before you argue with me remember I was the one telling you and the others awhile ago that she would be eaten alive on cross…which happened and that the jury would vote against her…which also happened. You’ve been wrong at every single turn in this situation.

Edited by Ari29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Ari29 said:

No she doesn’t, there is absolutely no basis to claim jury misconduct. If there were her lawyers would already be doing filings which they haven’t. They’re going to argue, based off Elaine and Amber’s interviews, that the judge is at fault for not admitting evidence. 
 

Appeals court generally don’t override jury rulings and this judge was extremely fair to BOTH sides. Her appeal isn’t going anywhere. 
 

Before you argue with me remember I was the one telling you and the others awhile ago that she would be eaten alive on cross…which happened and that the jury would vote against her…which also happened. You’ve been wrong at every single turn in this situation.

Johnny was the one eaten at the cross, not Amber lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just another example of the """""abused""""" man being verbally abusive towards his wife...

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mobility Mary said:

Johnny was the one eaten at the cross, not Amber lmao

So who’s lawyer was it that completely gave up on re-direct of their client after “trying” their best and still failing while also being admonished by the judge?

 

I can see why you side with Amber now, and it has little to do with believing all women and more to do with other, personal, issues 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

29 minutes ago, Froufrou said:

That audio has been explained ad-nauseam. She simply reacted to him hurting her feet while forcing a door open. 

 

Amber explained it already in 2016:

 

 

 

Furthermore, he himself asks about her feet in the recording. He also admits to pushing her.

 

BTW, in that same recording Amber tells him he SPLITS only when there's NO PHYSICAL VIOLENCE (0:37)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NausAllien said:

 

That audio has been explained ad-nauseam. She simply reacted to him hurting her feet while forcing a door open. 

 

Amber explained it already in 2016:

 

 

 

Furthermore, he himself asks about her feet in the recording. He also admits to pushing her.

 

BTW, in that same recording Amber tells him he SPLITS only when there's NO PHYSICAL VIOLENCE (0:37)

 

:bibliahh:congrats on getting gaslighted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Patient Zero said:

:bibliahh:congrats on getting gaslighted

You support Depp, so you're probably an EXPERT on gaslighting, aren't you? :mandown:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Heardsters thinking we “stan Depp”. They just don’t get it. We don’t stan anyone, that’s the difference between you and us. The only thing we stan is INNOCENCE and JUSTICE. And that’s why he won. But they blindly believe Heard because they have a blanket rule of #believeallwomen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Daydream said:

The Heardsters thinking we “stan Depp”. They just don’t get it. We don’t stan anyone, that’s the difference between you and us. The only thing we stan is INNOCENCE and JUSTICE. And that’s why he won. But they blindly believe Heard because they have a blanket rule of #believeallwomen.

Your profile pic shows that the last thing you stan is innocence. But you need to tell yourself that the Justice System never gets it wrong, otherwise you won't be able to sleep at night if you admit the true DEVIANT nature of the man you support

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not y'all STILL camping in here:skull:

 

Also who the hell advised her to do that interview she did with Savannah :rip: She really is her worst enemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This lying sack of hotmess already profited (literally, in cash) from her divorce settlement, alerting TMZ, her useless pledges, her ghostwritten article (paid for by Elon donating to ACLU), and her corporate speeches (at the peak of her campaign she was making $30K a piece to go around boardrooms & tell her lies).

 

And now it has emerged that AH even got paid for this sit-down with Savannah Guthrie. Apparently NBC forked over huge sum to her — which is why they spread the the whole thing out over a whole week and across multiple channels (NBC, Peacock) and across multiple programs (GMA, Dateline, etc). They did this in order to maximally recuperate what they had to pay.

 

It's obvious what is going on — JD is her meal-ticket. She cant make a living any other way. She has no talent. She can't even act as the world witnessed in court. So all she has left to do is ride the JD wave and collect whatever coin is thrown at her.

 

In other words jump from one scam to another.

 

The grift that keeps on grifting.

 

 

Dxdm3UC.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing is what it seems in AH land.

 

Apparently this so called therapy note is not even verified. The so called therapist's handwriting looks suspiciously like AH's own. Remember the notes were never admitted in court so they didn't have to be double checked by JD's team. If they had been admitted, then obviously Camille's team would have been all over them like white on rice, and exposed any authentication fraud, just like they did expose AH's tampered photos / videos after examining the metadata.

 

Edited by Raiden
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another day — another lie exposed.

 

Remember that at one time AH claimed the abuse started in 2013? Well well well.... now according to her notes the abuse started earlier. This is relevant because she gave JD a knife in June 2012.

 

There you have it — confirmed that AH gifted a Rambo blade to what according to her notes is a man who is abusing her  — like as if a real DV victim would even think of doing such an absurd thing.

 

FVbovEWWIAAsWSR?format=png&name=orig

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of Sauvage adverts I've seen since the trial. :skull: :skull: :skull: At least it might encourage a small number of incels to wash and smell good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.