hausofbryan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Just now, Nutitle said: The makeup MOTHER!! She did very similar for Miami, pre era vibes
kendoll2001 Posted February 12 Posted February 12 4 minutes ago, scheibe said: but which team is she rooting for? Repping her man’s city of San Fran. I forget that Michael is from SF, and how much time she spends in San Francisco 2
Foreigner Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance. The answer: there's just no contesting. An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them. Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there. What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's. It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness. All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself as a whole. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica? Edited February 12 by Foreigner 3 31
Abracadabra Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) I had a feeling she would go to the Super Bowl Edited February 12 by Miichael
hausofbryan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 The heels and the leather 🖤 A Gaga-esque Super Bowl look 1
Popular Post Summer Boy Posted February 12 Popular Post Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Foreigner said: Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she cahnged BTW lyrics during a recent performance. The answer: there's just no contesting. An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them. Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there. What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's. It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness. All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica? Not Taylor Swift when she's the most bland and uninteresting "singer" out there 15 1
Julio Posted February 12 Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Foreigner said: Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance. The answer: there's just no contesting. An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them. Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there. What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's. It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness. All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica? this bible? bye
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 12 Posted February 12 2 hours ago, ToniGaga96 said: She changed the lyrics from "king of the hill" to "queen of the hell" 👹 Oh I hear queen of the hell very clearly She doesnt change lyrics of New York New York often, does she? What if LG7 is hell themed we was like aaaa 1
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 12 Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, Foreigner said: Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance. The answer: there's just no contesting. An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them. Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there. What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's. It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness. All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica? Gurl stfu Swifties are do delusional and insufferable
AllyGayTor Posted February 12 Posted February 12 6 minutes ago, Foreigner said: Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance. The answer: there's just no contesting. An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them. Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there. What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's. It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness. All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica? Spelling is fun!
sunbathinganimal Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Quote Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks is sending me 1 13
TROJAN Posted February 12 Posted February 12 8 minutes ago, Foreigner said: Once in a while I have questioned myself why I had no interest in her last releases and I came to my mind when I was reading that she changed BTW lyrics during a recent performance. The answer: there's just no contesting. An artist, who doesn't want to fight for his work or to challange the status quo, isn't needed. Now I get why Lady Gaga it's not considered a vanguard artist anymore. She's afraid to take criticism and doesn't want the anger of her fans. A very much person used to what evangelical america thinks of her to the point that she even changes the tone when approaching them. Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics and attacking anyone or depicting the world with her storytelling. Lana Del Rey portrayals herself as the american ***** poet. Ariana cross the line telling a man to break with his girlfriend just to stay with her. These artists are not relatable as some might think. They put their lives into song lyrics and people sure are interested in gossips at best when they sing in a poetic way. Ups and downs, irony, happiness, ressentment and political nuances, all of that is there. What about Gaga? The same dance music and weird fashion from 2010's. It's a common place, it doesn't contest, it takes things as they are and it tries to conform not only to the way of the world, but also to the vision which the world has from her. What about the message? Aesthetics is important, but it isn't everything. When she debuted, the message was "I can be just weird as this clothes I wear" and now the current way of thinking, at least from a leftist point of view, is "I'm so ****ing weird that languange, thoughts and the world has to addapt to me". And guess what? The world has addapted to her weirdness. All I coud hear in chromatica was she crying because some upsets in her life with generic lyrics and a dance beat. 911 its a scratch to the rip apart that it would be, if she released herself as a whole. I miss sarcasm and irony. Enough with self-pity. Seriously, you have ask yourselves what did she wanted to achieve with chromatica? I stopped reading at “Taylor Swift is more provocative” 1
hausofbryan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 7 minutes ago, AllyGayTor said: Need more pictures luckily the papz got to her this time unlike Vegas, so we should get some good ones
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) 1 minute ago, sunbathinganimal said: is sending me Swifties live in a cult-like alternate reality eco-chamber where they convince themselves everytime Taylor farts it's the second coming of christ The white barbz Edited February 12 by SweetOreosOfHeaven 1 1
Happylittlepunk Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Imagen calling Taylor lyrics as special and ground breaking! 1
Foreigner Posted February 12 Posted February 12 3 minutes ago, Summer Boy said: Not Taylor Swift when she's the most bland and uninteresting "singer" out there She gives something to people talk about and what about Gaga? Besides her acting career, does anyone remember that she is singing about anything? I'm a huge Gaga fan, but her recent work is boring me too much. 10
nadiamendell Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Foreigner said: Taylor Swift is more provocative when taking risks in her lyrics Edited February 12 by nadiamendell
ReReplay Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Just now, Foreigner said: She gives something to people talk about and what about Gaga? Besides her acting career, does anyone remember that she is singing about anything? I'm a huge Gaga fan, but her recent work is boring me too much.
Recommended Posts