Jump to content

Lady Gaga


Phoenixstar

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, SweetOreosOfHeaven said:

how would y'all feel about a solo Lee movie somewhere down the line a la Birds of Prey?

 

If it's with other female co-leads with a female director and female screenwriters then yes, I do not want any men near Gaga 

 

:khalyan2:

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2

  • Replies 258k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Infernal Paradise

    7670

  • Almodusa

    6573

  • hausofbryan

    5594

  • opbranden

    5270

Posted
3 minutes ago, SweetOreosOfHeaven said:

how would y'all feel about a solo Lee movie somewhere down the line a la Birds of Prey?

 

As long as it will be directed by a good female director. 

  • Like 4
Posted
3 minutes ago, SweetOreosOfHeaven said:

how would y'all feel about a solo Lee movie somewhere down the line a la Birds of Prey?

 

This is 100% never ever happening lol

 

It's best to let JFAD go tbh. It's not going to get any Oscar nominations. At best a Comedy/Musical Actress Golden Globe nomination. Both soundtracks bombed. It's unfortunate but everyone has a panned flop from time to time.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Phoenixstar said:

Radio callouts

#28(+8) DWAS

is this good?

Posted
5 minutes ago, jesus del rey said:

If it's with other female co-leads with a female director and female screenwriters then yes, I do not want any men near Gaga 

 

:khalyan2:

Michael should fear jesus dle rey :gaygacat1:

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 minute ago, babyforlife said:

is this good?

ofc. people want to hear DWAS on radio more

also

2+8+8=18 18.10 lead single confirmed :gaycat1:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Posted
2 minutes ago, PMM said:

Michael should fear jesus dle rey :gaygacat1:

He was one of the reasons why we got Harlequin so he is good on my book but I don't how others in the base feel about that :gaycat2:

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, babyforlife said:

is this good?

Its rising so whoever is hearing DWAS through radio wants more :DWAS:

  • Like 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Andraslop said:

Well well well :coffee:

 

I think the rumored conversation is exaggerated, but it's clear they weren't happy with the final cut. If you look at their solo interviews, Gaga and Phoenix seemed comfortable with each other, having fun, laughing, and smiling. But in Venice, they acted weird and cold. The same thing happened in other interviews whenever Todd was present.

 

:deadbanana2:

 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, babyforlife said:

is this good?

Always good to rise but its still too low. I really dont know why, its so radio friendly.

 

Even weirder is how is this not smashing on HAC

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Hot Volcano said:

Always good to rise but its still too low. I really dont know why, its so radio friendly.

 

Even weirder is how is this not smashing on HAC

No payola from Interscope.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hot Volcano said:

Always good to rise but its still too low. I really dont know why, its so radio friendly.

 

Even weirder is how is this not smashing on HAC

maybe Mister Bobby don't want it on the radio. He knows the lead is coming so they must saving the coins 
o6oxtc2iuue41.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&a

Posted

96 hours until Notorious Being surprise song and video drop
 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Posted
4 hours ago, Vroom Vroom said:

So it looks like JFAD will break even. Making it not a total flop. Hopefully Gaga will snatch some acting nominations. She might get an Oscar nom for best original song 

Spoiler

It won't. 200M + 70-100M marketing.  

 

750M to break even, 600M to save face.

 

This will probably end somewhere between 350M to 450M 

 

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, RideOrDie said:

we need the joker era wrapped up right NOW, where are all my notorious beings?! please gar... 

BE A NOTORIOUS BEING JUST FOR THE WEEKEND! SWINE!

 

scream-loud-scream.gif

lol I think she's DONE with this movie, judging from her silence 

Edited by Funtonight15
Posted

11 days to LG7's lead :duca:

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, opbranden said:
  Hide contents

It won't. 200M + 70-100M marketing.  

 

750M to break even, 600M to save face.

 

This will probably end somewhere between 350M to 450M 

 

Forbes reported that they need around 450 million to break even. 
190 million budget and 100 million marketing that brings the total to 290 million.

This will end up in the same range

Edited by Bhumisah
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 hours ago, HausOfPunk said:

The Washington Post just dropped an article on JFAD's flop. Repeats the same things we've seen in other articles, but it reinforces the narrative that Gaga is NOT to blame.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/2024/10/06/joker-2-box-office/

 

The subtitle is "Not even Lady Gaga could save the anti-hero musical drama, which reportedly earned a bleak domestic opening of $40 million in domestic ticket sales." Which would imply that Gaga is a box office force otherwise! :gaygacat4:

 

Other mentions of Gaga:

 

"The second act of "Joker" has left audiences unamused, falling flat at the box office, sparking fan outrage over Lady Gaga's limited screen time..."

 

"Still many Lady Gaga fans alike took aim at the film for underutilizing the actress's talents. In particular, the singer's fans lamented about her limited screen time amid reports claiming that the actress is featured for less than a quarter of the movie's 139-minute run time.

 

And others slammed the film for misleading promotional material and called for Warner Bros. to release an extended cut with scenes of Lady Gaga in the official trailer that they say were omitted from the final movie. "Why are majority of the visuals featuring @ladygaga in the trailer missing from the actual @jokermovie?!" one user wrote on X. "Release the Gaga cut!!"

who's threading it :clap3:

 

Spoiler

:suburban:

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3
Posted
Just now, sunbathinganimal said:

who's threading it :clap3:

 

  Hide contents

:suburban:

 

i wonder how other fanbases feel when Gaga side project flops, yet she somehow keeps on winning. it must be crucial 

  • Haha 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Bhumisah said:

Forbes reported that they need around 450 million to break even. 
190 million budget and 100 million marketing that brings the total to 390 million.

This will end up in the same range

Weird :huh:

To break even, a movie typically needs to earn 2.5 to 3 times its production budget due to marketing and other costs.

 

Studios don't get the full box office revenue. In the U.S., studios keep about 50-55%, while internationally they get around 40-45%.

 

In China, studios only receive about 25% of box office earnings due to strict revenue-sharing rules.

 

Let's say a random movie :eli: costs $200 million to produce and $100 million to market (total $300 million). To break even:

 

At 50% domestic revenue share, the movie would need to earn $600 million at the global box office to give the studio its $300 million back. But with lower international shares, especially from countries like China, this number may need to be higher. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, Andraslop said:

Well well well :coffee:

 

the 'Todd great film' is sending me :deadbanana2:

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 minute ago, Infernal Paradise said:

 

doing-math-wrong-answer.gif

I explained the math in my post above :laugh:

Posted
1 minute ago, Infernal Paradise said:

 

doing-math-wrong-answer.gif

however much it ends up making, that's what it needed to break even

 

UsoYifr.png

  • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.