Miss Anthropocene Posted August 31 Posted August 31 It's coming on 18th October. source: my big toe 8
Popular Post curiousladybug Posted August 31 Popular Post Posted August 31 45 minutes ago, Jack! said: Bling posted this on GGD so his tea doesn't get twisted Reveal hidden contents - A lot is going on behind the scenes specifically, what Gaga wants clashes with Interscope, what Interscope wants is clashing with Gaga's ideas. But it is happening in September and they are working out things - Interscope wants to do a Billie style drop, Gaga is looking for more longevity for the era, multiple singles etc. - Lead did change due to Interscope's request for a more commercial sound. Unsure if they switched it back after DWAS success although an MV is ready. - Distributors already have the album and were asked to tease/leak snippets from the album to generate hype. - There may be some massive leaks as people are in access of the album. (This is a guess) Distributors having the album is throwing me off too a bit. Plus the only credible leak we got was 6 seconds of Girlfriend. Unless I missed something recently. Errr I'm not moving with this yet. We'll see how next week goes. I presume she'll be active on her socials if she flies out to Venice earlier which could be a good momentum grab, but also if she and Interscope still haven't actually came to an agreement on the plan yet, I doubt they'd have anything ready imminently. This is bullshit. The only time Gaga and her team (well some of them) intentionally leaked something is back when she leaked Aura in spite of Interscope. Leaks that are currently out there are NOT intentional. Saying **** like this just disproves their "insider" knowledge because anyone who actually knows how music distribution works wouldn't be saying all this bullshit. "Gaga's team told the distributors to leaks some of the stuff" - YEAAA RIGHTTTTTT… 22
Freaky Prince Posted August 31 Posted August 31 13 minutes ago, Bhabylon said: I'm sure interscope won't want to pass up the opportunity to release something when all eyes are on GodGa Yeah so remember 2019? 2 5
Bhabylon Posted August 31 Posted August 31 18 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said: Yeah so remember 2019? That's different though. We all thought ASIB was gonna be a Glitter situation this is a for sure box office smasha
H34rtOfCharcoal Posted August 31 Posted August 31 5 hours ago, SweetOreosOfHeaven said: @H34rtOfCharcoal unfortunately will not be able to watch the delulu livestream, will y'all release this episode later? Can't wait for the new tea I think someone posted it here but if not https://youtu.be/umUXyrpolXY?si=6Q9TnLyU0E4-AnW- 1
H34rtOfCharcoal Posted August 31 Posted August 31 57 minutes ago, Dylangaga said: Which one of those podcasters is sleeping with Bobby? NOT me Spoiler
Dylangaga Posted August 31 Posted August 31 7 minutes ago, H34rtOfCharcoal said: NOT me Reveal hidden contents 7
helpthomas Posted August 31 Posted August 31 7 minutes ago, H34rtOfCharcoal said: NOT me Reveal hidden contents hey, i'm not trying to "shoot the messenger", but it could be helpful in the future if you'd at least disclose how credible your source is. if the person you're getting the tea from has given you correct information before, a statement as such would not leave a lot to be debatable. it's way too easy to simply make stuff up, credit an anonymous source and then pull the "believe me if you want to!" card, because your tea won't bite you in the ass if/when proven fake. with that said, i still gladly appreciate any tea at this point, because we're all thirsty for the album and any details around the release! but if you mean what you're saying then imo you should try to make it as believable as possible without hurting yourself or the source 1
Puttanesca Posted August 31 Posted August 31 1 hour ago, Dumbledore said: Artist work for their labels, they appear to us to be more independent than they actually are and should be. Even Michael ******* Jackson suffered from it. Idk what kind of contract they have, but very few people managed to get completely free creative direction on their projects. As far as I'm aware, Madonna's deal has always been very permissive regarding creative freedom. Maybe we assume Gaga has more control than she actually has? I don't doubt this, but when I see people like Billie and Ariana do less traditional eras and create music that isn't super trendy I think to myself that surely Gaga has the freedom to do the same. 3
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Luv the podcast but yeah everything about that tea is giving messy it's6a6a teas Leaking snippets to create hype? Among the people who are already locked in to listen to the album the minute it drops? Literally no one else cares. Why not post them on Gaga's tiktok page so they actually have a chance at gaining traction? Nothing about this tea makes sense. I do think it's well intentioned but we have to use our critical-thinking skills here. 1 1 11
Dawn the Jockey Posted August 31 Posted August 31 1 hour ago, hausofbryan said: https://ukairplaychart.com/#chart/type=1/channel=false/date=33/length=40 Up to #4 on UK radio. Definitely a #1 contender over the next week or so. Radio has zero influence on the official UK charts as far as i know
H34rtOfCharcoal Posted August 31 Posted August 31 44 minutes ago, helpthomas said: hey, i'm not trying to "shoot the messenger", but it could be helpful in the future if you'd at least disclose how credible your source is. if the person you're getting the tea from has given you correct information before, a statement as such would not leave a lot to be debatable. it's way too easy to simply make stuff up, credit an anonymous source and then pull the "believe me if you want to!" card, because your tea won't bite you in the ass if/when proven fake. with that said, i still gladly appreciate any tea at this point, because we're all thirsty for the album and any details around the release! but if you mean what you're saying then imo you should try to make it as believable as possible without hurting yourself or the source I totally understand! The credibility "statement" regarding my source has appeared twice, once in a podcast episode on Spotify, and once on an AMA video on YouTube, in addition to plenty of comments on GGD. Majority of members in our discord have heard this credibility statement in addition to comments on the discord, so I didn't feel the need to get back into it. Just assuming people will think I'm making stuff up atp anyway, plus I'm not offended if people don't believe what I'm saying. Perhaps I should say "the source works at a label" in the future 💗 1
hausofbryan Posted August 31 Posted August 31 Let's go, girls! This is the one area we can impact radio. Those with some fan following on Twitter, make sure to share!
Dylangaga Posted August 31 Posted August 31 29 minutes ago, Bewitched said: Now which one of you is THIS? 3
HeavyMetalAura Posted September 1 Posted September 1 2 hours ago, Dumbledore said: Artist work for their labels, they appear to us to be more independent than they actually are and should be. Even Michael ******* Jackson suffered from it. Idk what kind of contract they have, but very few people managed to get completely free creative direction on their projects. As far as I'm aware, Madonna's deal has always been very permissive regarding creative freedom. Maybe we assume Gaga has more control than she actually has? Even Madonna suffers from it. Maybe she had more control on Warner and when she was selling more records, but she spoke at length of label interference on Rebel Heart. She never spoke about MDNA herself, but I swear that one of her producers said that label politics kept the best songs in circulation away from MDNA and they were left with other artists' scraps (she apparently wanted Chris Brown's Turn Up the Music, for example, but couldn't get it). I can't find the interview about that so I could making it up but I swear it happened. 1
EnigmaticAndroid Posted September 1 Posted September 1 1 hour ago, Bewitched said: The rando singing along 4
Santhosh Posted September 1 Posted September 1 Whatever the **** Can she not release lead single this time? Just announce the album 3 or 4 weeks before and drop all the **** together at once She ****** up 2 twice for me to believe her that she pull off this time. The audacity of her to release lead and not promote it when she released SL
Aston Martin Posted September 1 Posted September 1 Spoiler: alleged LG7 snippet lyrics Spoiler Quote With me/hit me, c'mon (DJ, hit the lights) I could be your girlfriend for the weekend But you have to sell your soul to keep me Tell me I'm the Eve that you believe in Like when we're leaving the Garden of Eden A little change is twice as nice I gotta touch you, take the bite A little ch- Quote ABRACADABRA ABRACADABRA WHAT THE ****- Quote *godly industrial instrumental* I've become a notorious being Quote (Monsters around) Dance in the shadow of the niiiiiii I need this album so badly, it literally sounds phenomenal based on the snippets we've gotten oh Godga 1 2
MadMax12 Posted September 1 Posted September 1 Yeah if it was coming this year there would have been an announcement now. The real question is will she wait until the movie awards season is over in 2026? 1
Dylangaga Posted September 1 Posted September 1 (edited) The calm before the storm aka GaGa another weekend full of meltdowns for the upcoming -2M update Edited September 1 by Dylangaga
PlERRE Posted September 1 Posted September 1 I won't say names, but apparently someone took Sarah's passport and she can't find it anywhere. Venice cancelled for the Haus Labs Creative Director. 8
Recommended Posts