SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 26 Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, suburbannature said: Yeah, no. They were critics from major publications and I (and others) posted excerpts but then that became “obsessed!!!” Typical echo chamber. Of course you did.
Popular Post GraceRandolph Posted February 26 Popular Post Posted February 26 6 minutes ago, suburbannature said: This is kind of revisionist, love. She received a LOT of mixed or straight-up negative reviews. Define “a LOT” because the majority of reviews cited her as carrying the film and many critics associations nominated her for Best Actress. 15
hausofdave Posted February 26 Posted February 26 didn't realized OGH's were suddenly acting coach experts 2
Shelter Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Well at least she can land a lead role. That’s something Can’t say the same about others 1
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Oh well, the usual culprits. From Rotten Tomatoes: «Critics Consensus: House of Gucci vacillates between inspired camp and dour drama too often to pull off a confident runway strut, but Lady Gaga's note-perfect performance has a timeless style all its own. » Others would dream to have a mixed performance like this. 6
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 26 Posted February 26 1 minute ago, hausofdave said: didn't realized OGH's were suddenly acting coach experts We should know by now OGH's are the only ones that can match Gar's versatility
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 26 Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said: Define “a LOT” because the majority of reviews cited her as carrying the film and many critics associations nominated her for Best Actress. A lot of the voices in their head probably. The irony of using the "eco-chamber" card 1 2
Rotunda Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Gaga is talented enough to be an Oscar nominee, and has so far picked and been picked for smart roles. That’s really all there is to it. 9
Jay07 Posted February 26 Posted February 26 3 minutes ago, Digitalism said: yes But even she is delusional about her place in hollywood Waiting years between movies just to choose a movie by a director that in the last 2 decades has mostly missed like Ridley was a dumb move If she wanted to be a working actress she should have choosen maybe smaller roles that were more challenging where she is not the center of attention Now she is in Joker 2 with another director with a horrible track record that has never done a musical. It's another big gamble after a critical and comercial flop like HOG Yeah that's interesting. I also expected her to pick character roles with auteur directors and build up her credentials but she has gone for very buzzy, publicized movies. It's giving more career move than being serious about acting but it got her a big paycheck so.
AllyGayTor Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Here comes the movie expert(s), this is reminding me of a certain Rotten Tomatoes thread... Anyways, not everyone can smash in the movie and music industry like Gaga has
Orsay Posted February 26 Posted February 26 I think the fact that she landed the role in Joker speaks to her being regarded pretty highly in Hollywood. Some little monsters might overdo it, but it’s objective that she’s done better in her acting career than any other female pop star since Barbra or Cher
EdgeofTeeth Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Are we talking about the same woman who scored an Oscar nomination for her first leading role in a feature film, was noted as a standout in her second alongside an all-star cast of acting veterans, and will be starring in what is arguably the most highly anticipated film of 2024, which also happens to be the sequel to an Oscar-winning, billion dollar-grossing hit? Then no, no one is being delusional about her place in the field. 14
Orsay Posted February 26 Posted February 26 (edited) 20 minutes ago, suburbannature said: She’s good sometimes, but yes. The meltdowns when people posted all of the negative reviews her HOG performance received they've calmed down a lot, though. Early buzz says she’s good in Joker: FAD There may have been negative reviews but the Rotten Tomatoes summary of the critical consensus highlights her performance as the redeeming part of the film. Unless you think a little monster wrote that! The general feedback from critics on the movie was that she wasn’t the problem, quite the contrary Edited February 26 by Orsay 1
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 26 Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, EdgeofTeeth said: Are we talking about the same woman who scored an Oscar nomination for her first leading role in a feature film, was noted as a standout in her second alongside an all-star cast of acting veterans, and will be starring in what is arguably the most highly anticipated film of 2024, which also happens to be the sequel to an Oscar-winning, billion dollar-grossing hit? Then no, no one is being delusional about her place in the field. Not to mention the fact that among that cast she was the actress that actually brought the most people to the movie theater.
SweetOreosOfHeaven Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Just now, Orsay said: There may have been negative reviews but the Rotten Tomatoes summary, which aims to sum up the critical consensus, literally names her performance as the highlight of the film. Unless you think a little monster wrote that! The general feedback from critics on the movie was that she wasn’t the problem, quite the contrary You can't reason with eco-chambers I fear.
JohnWayneHolland Posted February 26 Posted February 26 I mean so far both of her staring roles have received plenty of nominations/awards, and not for the Razzies, so + she was the second highest paid actress of 2023 only behind Margot Robbie...
vale9001 Posted February 26 Author Posted February 26 (edited) Btw like i said the thread Is not about Gaga acting skills. I found her very good in a star Is Born. The thread is about her space in Hollywood right now. She's not requested right now by top tier directors, oscar winning directors etc.. I think her fan base has too much hype for joker 2 and in general for her acting career (in terms of recognition, as I wrote i'm not saying Gaga can't make very famous and loved roles in any kind of movie in the future). I mean i'm just saying you're setting up her too much and then the haters came hard of you make It. Edited February 26 by vale9001
suburbannature Posted February 26 Posted February 26 2 minutes ago, Orsay said: There may have been negative reviews but the Rotten Tomatoes summary, which aims to sum up the critical consensus, literally names her performance as the highlight of the film. Unless you think a little monster wrote that! The general feedback from critics on the movie was that she wasn’t the problem, quite the contrary She received praise from several critics and approx two dozen mixed/negative from MC/RT-eligible critics as well. They were posted in the thread at the time. Y’all couldn’t handle it then and can’t handle it now. having a more mixed reception doesn’t mean the praise doesn’t exist.
playboi Posted February 26 Posted February 26 Also the Oscars academy should NEVER be considered a hallmark for film/acting quality They've been consistently giving awards to the a very small community of Hollywood elite, receiving an oscar or being nominated for one is like... 99% for pandering to them and 1% for the actual material 5
Digitalism Posted February 26 Posted February 26 6 minutes ago, Jay07 said: Yeah that's interesting. I also expected her to pick character roles with auteur directors and build up her credentials but she has gone for very buzzy, publicized movies. It's giving more career move than being serious about acting but it got her a big paycheck so. It's like she is waiting for big flashy roles in big movies that can be big at the box office instead of choosing several maybe smaller good movies or good roles. 1
John Slayne Posted February 26 Posted February 26 17 minutes ago, suburbannature said: This is kind of revisionist, love. She received a LOT of mixed or straight-up negative reviews. Rotten tomatoes critics consensus: House of Gucci vacillates between inspired camp and dour drama too often to pull off a confident runway strut, but Lady Gaga's note-perfect performance has a timeless style all its own. are the mixed and straight up negative reviews in the room with us right now? 5 1
RandomHooker Posted February 26 Posted February 26 No. Also it seems that you have way too much time on your hands.
suburbannature Posted February 26 Posted February 26 (edited) 3 minutes ago, John Slayne said: Rotten tomatoes critics consensus: House of Gucci vacillates between inspired camp and dour drama too often to pull off a confident runway strut, but Lady Gaga's note-perfect performance has a timeless style all its own. are the mixed and straight up negative reviews in the room with us right now? first of all, those are critic awards bodies - some are reviewers, many are not. Some of those are peer industry award. We’re talking about reviews. Annette Bening’s terrible Nyah performance was nominated frequently as well. Go back to the critic thread and you can see the mixed reviews listed in detail. Edited February 26 by suburbannature 1
Recommended Posts