And yet it's the first thing they brought up in that tweet.

Am I the only one who thinks this album is better than her last 4 albums?

32 minutes ago, iliketaylorsmusic said:

Needed to mention Taylor cus otherwise nobody would give a f*ck about their articles

And the way this is a repost cuz they posted the same thing a couple of hours before without the Taylor mention and barely anyone checked it out…

Then why are they mentioning her name in the first sentence of the article?

Very lame engagement bait. *yawns cutely*

And I don't even **** with the album as a Swiftie tbh. But this is just sooooo snobby and screams "Pls click on our article and give us some ad revenue coins"...

Meh!

Whenever this godforsaken site posts anything, Halsey comes to mind.

i just know taylor is FUMING, and just wait until she gets zero grammys next

Someone doesn't like to eat on mcdonalds

42 minutes ago, iliketaylorsmusic said:

Needed to mention Taylor cus otherwise nobody would give a f*ck about their articles

Oh I'm sure atrl user iliketaylorsmusic.

They ate that. The basement is safe from collapse today.

Unnecessary. And a little off topic.

It's just bullying atp

Pitchfork becoming more and more like tabloid publications

What petty and immature response from a major publication, funny how they still gave the album a score and mentioned it AGAIN despite them "not wanting to talk about it" ... clearly there's something that they can't escape not talking about.

9 minutes ago, AshleyLovescats887 said:

What petty and immature response from a major publication, funny how they still gave the album a score and mentioned it AGAIN despite them "not wanting to talk about it" ... clearly there's something that they can't escape not talking about.

Exactly. But I understand.

It's just like me when I want to eat a filet mignon or anything good (Eusexua, LUX or Mayhem) with my boyfriend and we pass a McDonald (T. swift). We can't escape saying 'how low quality and boring it is' and how 'we hope people stop being unhealthy by consuming that ****'. But alas, like all good capitalist corporation it's everywhere and all we can do is comment on it :(

AHHHHH

Yet it's the first thing they bring up, so lame having to use Taylor to get people to check their list.

1 hour ago, Doctor Dick said:

They don't "need" anything from her. Sometimes you Swifties need to take your heads out of your own asses.

But they do need her

but they gave swag a #13 spot

3 minutes ago, tambora said:

but they gave swag a #13 spot

And rated Karol G above Rosalia

Ok now refund every bad review if this is the case

This is the engagement bait the Swifties were whining about, not a fascist regime trying to use your music as a co sign to atrocities.

Change the score then!

1 hour ago, iliketaylorsmusic said:

Needed to mention Taylor cus otherwise nobody would give a f*ck about their articles

If Taylor stopped making music pitchfork would still exist and still continue to review noteworthy albums. Unfortunately hers was a creative bomb.

Edited Thursday at 11:32 PM3 days by Onyxmage

It may be a bad album, but it is still good enough for them to get the engagement they wouldn't have otherwise