Jump to content

Do you think Britney should have won more Grammy's?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Based off of some of the present day winners, absolutely! :suburban:

  • Like 2

  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • BionicWooHoo

    21

  • Jay07

    19

  • supaspaz

    11

  • Yes, AND

    10

Posted

Definitely :dies:

 

 

she would've sweeped in her Prime

if they were giving the awards like they are doing now

:toofunny3:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Toxic should've been Song of the Year.

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Rev8 said:

if they were giving the awards like they are doing now

 

Well, when she came back with Womanizer, she suddenly won all the VMAs.

Posted

The Grammys can kiss her ass.

  • Like 3
Posted

Blackout should have won something for sure

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, prézli said:

Well, when she came back with Womanizer, she suddenly won all the VMAs.

Her First wins mind you :dies:

 

I get the biased Grammys, but the VMAs really shunned her for no reason :toofunny3:

 

 

 

ot: I remember when even Billboard came out with an article questioning why Britney wasn't nominated for a Grammy

lmao

  • Like 1
Posted

No, the music was weak and thankfully Poptimism wasn't a thing when she was relevant. The one she did get was for a song that was already made before she got her hands on it, which makes complete sense.

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted
12 minutes ago, James_Dean said:

Based off of some of the present day winners, absolutely! :suburban:

 

10 minutes ago, Rev8 said:

Definitely :dies:

 

 

she would've sweeped in her Prime

if they were giving the awards like they are doing now

:toofunny3:

 

Just look at the list of their best new artist recently, the reductive is real... :rip: Macklemore & Ryan Lewis, Meghan Trainor, Chance the rapper, Alessia Cara, Sam Smith, Megan Thee Stallion, Billie Eilish, Olivia Rodrigo, Samara Joy... 

 

They just handover the awards for whoever is popular these days. :pig:

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted
1 hour ago, supaspaz said:

She had the disadvantage of coming out during the "Grannys" era. The Recording Academy was practically allergic to rewarding relevant music and/or young artists.

:bibliahh:I have to laugh 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Don't you have to sing your own songs? Even the toxic win is fraudulent 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

she could have won Grammys for things off Circus easily, let alone talk about Blackout singles, Britney, Oops singles as well. 
 

whatevs, she doesn't give a f about them and neither should we :lakitu:

Posted

100%. Definitely should've won for Female Pop Performance for BOMT & OIDIA. I was surprised to see that the BOMT album itself didnt get a nod for Pop Album. Also should have deserved recognition for Blackout for sure.

Posted

Madonna doesn't have that many Grammys either. It was before they were giving them out like candy. 

  • ATRL Moderator
Posted
40 minutes ago, BionicWooHoo said:

:bibliahh:I have to laugh 

https://www.latimes.com/archives/blogs/pop-hiss/story/2011-11-30/critics-notebook-grammy-awards-your-grannys-awards
 

https://www.theoaklandpress.com/2005/02/13/reputation-as-the-grannies-doesnt-make-grammy-night-matter-any-less/amp/

 

https://www.fastcompany.com/2679825/how-the-grammys-went-from-granny-to-gaga

 

You can laugh all you want, but this is well-established.

 

Think about how your fave never got another general field nomination after winning Best New Artist.

  • Like 6
  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

In The Zone was an absolute no-brainer for Best Pop Vocal Album. Especially against some of the albums that have been awarded that title over the last few years. 

Posted

Britney the album

 

In the zone

 

Blackout

 

all them deserved grammys but britney doesnt need them or care about that flop ceremony

Posted
1 hour ago, supaspaz said:

What does me laughing at your delusion have to do with my fave? Why are you as a mod not following your own rules and going off topic? 
 

Furthermore, since you wanna bring up my fave, if the recording academy is ageist why does my fave have 4 pop vocal Grammys total when Britney has zero? Hmmm? It's not like you said the recording academy is ageist for just general field 

 

p.s. beautiful has a song of the year nom (yes I know it's a songwriter award)

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
3 hours ago, superben said:

Toxic deserves a ROTY.

Realistically this is the only other win.

 

Baby one more time is connected to teen pop so it wasn't going to win but Toxic should have been nominated and won ROTY for 2005.

Posted
2 hours ago, prézli said:

Well, when she came back with Womanizer, she suddenly won all the VMAs.

That was with Piece Of Me. She didn't even show up for her Womanizer win.

 

OT: she doesn't need the Grammys

Posted
2 hours ago, Rev8 said:

Her First wins mind you :dies:

 

I get the biased Grammys, but the VMAs really shunned her for no reason :toofunny3:

 

 

 

ot: I remember when even Billboard came out with an article questioning why Britney wasn't nominated for a Grammy

lmao

Yes VMAs is worse because even if they didn't want to award her for BOMT because they thought she wouldn't have longevity she deserved a win for Toxic, Oops, and Slave.

 

For the grammy's they were never going to award BOMT despite it deserving an award and more noms but could have nominated and awarded her for ROTY for Toxic.

 

Based on the competition, I couldn't see a case for her winning any other year.

Posted
4 hours ago, leyaris11 said:

 

 

Just look at the list of their best new artist recently, the reductive is real... :rip: Macklemore & Ryan Lewis, Meghan Trainor, Chance the rapper, Alessia Cara, Sam Smith, Megan Thee Stallion, Billie Eilish, Olivia Rodrigo, Samara Joy... 

 

They just handover the awards for whoever is popular these days. :pig:

 

 

 

UMM it's refreshing to see a Young Black Girl winning a Grammy for a Jazz. You can't dismiss actual talent lmao. All of the people on that list even Macklemore who didn't deserve to win is more talented than Britney. 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Britney definitely deserved to win more grammy awards. Britney singles were masterpieces in my opinion

  • Like 1
Posted

No. Maybe more Peoples Choice Awards back when she was successful?

  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

She was a label puppet so no. A win for Toxic sounds alright. 

  • Like 7
  • Thumbs Down 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.