A Million Lights Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 The Change Your Mind songstress only has 1 Grammy (Toxic). Do you think she deserved another one? imo: TTWE should have won in the same category Toxic did 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lana Banana Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cloudy Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Of course not. 22 8 6 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sailor Moon Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Everytime sounds like a Grammy winner song 12 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_int Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crf13 Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devin Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 she shouldve won BNA and something for Oops. 5 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildsidenormani Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 it's hard to believe godney only has 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erreur2 La Nature Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 I have never cared about this award show and Britney either but objectively yes. Her and many other artists have curiously been snubbed by this specific ceremony. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatyPrismSpirit Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 she was snubbed for Baby One More Time Best Female Pop Vocal Performance 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeferino Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
popmusicisdead Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 if the Grammys was what it is now, she would've swept 2000. but i guess the Grammys just don't like her. they never did. that one for Toxic was like a handout 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATRL Moderator supaspaz Posted March 23 ATRL Moderator Share Posted March 23 She had the disadvantage of coming out during the “Grannys” era. The Recording Academy was practically allergic to rewarding relevant music and/or young artists. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEX Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Her chances were definitely hurt by the presence of the word "vocal" in pop categories. The grammys should have never used that word to differentiate from the classical categories. Many pop artists have been snubbed because of it 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abrahamjmr Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 5 minutes ago, popmusicisdead said: if the Grammys was what it is now, she would've swept 2000. but i guess the Grammys just don't like her. they never did. that one for Toxic was like a handout Production didn't like her performance in 99. That's why they've been snubbing her. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shyboi Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 grammys were and still **** 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
makeme Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Her 2000 and 2001 nominations for best female pop vocal should of been hers. And in present day grammy voting they would of been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankvert Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leyaris11 Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Best new artist rightfully goes to xtina (due to her voice) but baby one more time.... should have won record/song of the year or best pop song of the year. And Blackout should have one Best pop album of the year. Anyway, Granny doesn't like pop artist back in the day but everything has changed, they more easy and less harsh on popular female. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumbsparce Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 (edited) Absolutely. Overprotected, BOMT and Gimme More deserved sth in the pop categories and ITZ could snatch an album win. I don't know how they were received back then but if poptimism occured during Brit's prime she'd have at least a couple more Grammys. Edited March 23 by dumbsparce 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katamari Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 no tbh her loss in 2000 should have went to genie and her her 2001 lost should have went to madonna music not everyone needs to win a lot of grammys and her legacy and sales more than make up for it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jomarr Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Yes. She should have won pop vocal performance for Baby, Oops, and Overprotected and slipped something for Blackout but obviously they hate her. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superben Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Toxic deserves a ROTY. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
americanshameless Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 Get Naked sounds like a Grammy winner song 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinnerCity Posted March 23 Share Posted March 23 If winning GRAMMYs could change someone's career then perhaps yes but there are legends without many and commercial failures with many so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.5c069777b1ab1d704a32825806767213.png)
Recommended Posts